First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
Post Reply World Domination
9551 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M
Offline
Posted 5/19/15

papagolfwhiskey wrote:


megahobbit wrote:


That libertarians Ideals are directly opposed to the idea of a dictatorship.


and?


Its not really a libertarian government if theres a dictator just like its not really a communist government if theres a king.
6151 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / 30.4894° N, 86.54...
Offline
Posted 5/19/15

KarenAraragi wrote:


AiYumega wrote:



I've said this before, but real humans with cat ears would be disturbing and they'd probably die from an infection from genetically adding body parts to them that shouldn't be there




I would't find real humans with cat ears disturbing a all. And the ear infection is a pointless argument. First that true for any body modification or any arm or leg transplant. Secondly there a way to get around that problem with zero chance of rejection. Stem cells Scientist have say if you can make a body part with the same person stem cells, there zero rejection. In fact they all ready made a bone transplant for a man who have a huge piece of skull missing. And that no the only success story. Your body can't reject himself.

Anyway you are such negative about this. For every problem there a solution.


I didn't know not having cat ears was considered a problem.
75434 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
49 / F / Center of the Uni...
Offline
Posted 5/19/15

megahobbit wrote:


papagolfwhiskey wrote:


megahobbit wrote:


That libertarians Ideals are directly opposed to the idea of a dictatorship.


and?


Its not really a libertarian government if theres a dictator just like its not really a communist government if theres a king.


Ooh that's good one. I'll install a Communist Kingdom then too. both as sole world authorities. maybe throw in a secular theocracy while I'm at it.

Posted 5/19/15 , edited 5/19/15

Firedestroyer wrote:

Well, I'd be in charge of entertaining our overlords at that point. If they get bored, the simulation shuts off, and we cease to exist! Is that not the obvious course of action?




I'm in love with this post.
9551 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M
Offline
Posted 5/19/15

papagolfwhiskey wrote:


megahobbit wrote:


papagolfwhiskey wrote:


megahobbit wrote:


That libertarians Ideals are directly opposed to the idea of a dictatorship.


and?


Its not really a libertarian government if theres a dictator just like its not really a communist government if theres a king.


Ooh that's good one. I'll install a Communist Kingdom then too. both as sole world authorities. maybe throw in a secular theocracy while I'm at it.



Your just fucking with me right?
Posted 5/19/15
10831 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
13 / F / California
Offline
Posted 5/19/15
I'd build the Alaska-Russia bridge and unleash hordes of Russian drivers on Canadians.

Then I'd make everyone drive on the 'MERICAN side of the road.



After that, I'd force all counties with gun control to have everybody armed all the time, and I'd ban HFCS.

And as my final act, I'd raise the speed limit to 150mph (200+kph) and remove all airbags from cars.

75434 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
49 / F / Center of the Uni...
Offline
Posted 5/19/15 , edited 5/19/15

megahobbit wrote:


Your just fucking with me right?


It appears I really suck at trying to be funny. I suppose I should be happy that you at least noticed the self contradiction.


Posted 5/19/15

megahobbit wrote:


KarenAraragi wrote:



Pipe dream ? Umm... Let be honest here. Humans are creatures of desires are we not ? Genetics engineering, money Catgirls, money. If there a market for it, it will be made. Also there nothing that says catgirls can't be robots with a self-aware IA.


Yeah buddy keep telling yourself that if we try to engineer catgirls its gonna work. You should set up a catgirl engineering institute.

That being said... and I cant believe im fucking arguing this.
Owning a robot with a self aware AI would still be wrong.


You know we all ready clone animals right ? Also are you not aware that we all ready have the technology to modify the human genome. For example scientist have giving rat and other animals albinism. And they clearly say they can add and remove any gene they want. The only reason has not been done to humans is because of the law. And that can easily change any moment.

That not going to stop people from doing it. Money.

Owning a robot with a self aware AI would still be wrong


Do you really have reason why is not going to happen? Because I am yet to hear your reason why is not possible ? The only reason why is not happen yet is because the law prohibits humans genome modification. The other day scientist were talking about changing the law and making arguments about it. And when the law changes what is allow and is not. Companies are gonna go for any kind of modification that can make them money.
9551 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M
Offline
Posted 5/19/15

KarenAraragi wrote:


megahobbit wrote:


KarenAraragi wrote:



Pipe dream ? Umm... Let be honest here. Humans are creatures of desires are we not ? Genetics engineering, money Catgirls, money. If there a market for it, it will be made. Also there nothing that says catgirls can't be robots with a self-aware IA.


Yeah buddy keep telling yourself that if we try to engineer catgirls its gonna work. You should set up a catgirl engineering institute.

That being said... and I cant believe im fucking arguing this.
Owning a robot with a self aware AI would still be wrong.


You know we all ready clone animals right ? Also are you not aware that we all ready have the technology to modify the human genome. For example scientist have giving rat and other animals albinism. And they clearly say they can add and remove any gene they want. The only reason has not been done to humans is because of the law. And that can easily change any moment.

That not going to stop people from doing it. Money.

Owning a robot with a self aware AI would still be wrong


Do you really have reason why is not going to happen? Because I am yet to hear your reason why is not possible ? The only reason why is not happen yet is because the law prohibits humans genome modification. The other day scientist were talking about changing the law and making arguments about it. And when the law changes what is allow and is not. Companies are gonna go for any kind of modification that can make them money.


1. There is a huge difference between making animals albino and fucking messing with the genome to to specifically grow cat ears. Like thousands of miles. Secondly your literally proposing we go all designer babies and give give babies cat ears whether they want to or not.

2. Your literally fucking talking about genetically engineering catgirls so you can fuck them. The moment someone tries to defend this as ethical I will vomit.

3. You do realize the Money needed to mess with the genomes is literlly in the billions of dollars. Governments are the only people who can pay for this research. Sure big institutes can help out but thats entirely second to governments. Whether you like it or not you dont have enough Money to genetically engineer catgirls.
20695 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
38 / M / Kansas
Offline
Posted 5/19/15
I'm going to Disneyland!
2524 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M / Out of sight (But...
Offline
Posted 5/19/15

KarenAraragi wrote:


megahobbit wrote:


KarenAraragi wrote:



Pipe dream ? Umm... Let be honest here. Humans are creatures of desires are we not ? Genetics engineering, money Catgirls, money. If there a market for it, it will be made. Also there nothing that says catgirls can't be robots with a self-aware IA.


Yeah buddy keep telling yourself that if we try to engineer catgirls its gonna work. You should set up a catgirl engineering institute.

That being said... and I cant believe im fucking arguing this.
Owning a robot with a self aware AI would still be wrong.


You know we all ready clone animals right ? Also are you not aware that we all ready have the technology to modify the human genome. For example scientist have giving rat and other animals albinism. And they clearly say they can add and remove any gene they want. The only reason has not been done to humans is because of the law. And that can easily change any moment.

That not going to stop people from doing it. Money.

Owning a robot with a self aware AI would still be wrong


Do you really have reason why is not going to happen? Because I am yet to hear your reason why is not possible ? The only reason why is not happen yet is because the law prohibits humans genome modification. The other day scientist were talking about changing the law and making arguments about it. And when the law changes what is allow and is not. Companies are gonna go for any kind of modification that can make them money.


... How are catgirls going to make companies money?
Posted 5/19/15

megahobbit wrote:


KarenAraragi wrote:


megahobbit wrote:


KarenAraragi wrote:



Pipe dream ? Umm... Let be honest here. Humans are creatures of desires are we not ? Genetics engineering, money Catgirls, money. If there a market for it, it will be made. Also there nothing that says catgirls can't be robots with a self-aware IA.


Yeah buddy keep telling yourself that if we try to engineer catgirls its gonna work. You should set up a catgirl engineering institute.

That being said... and I cant believe im fucking arguing this.
Owning a robot with a self aware AI would still be wrong.


You know we all ready clone animals right ? Also are you not aware that we all ready have the technology to modify the human genome. For example scientist have giving rat and other animals albinism. And they clearly say they can add and remove any gene they want. The only reason has not been done to humans is because of the law. And that can easily change any moment.

That not going to stop people from doing it. Money.

Owning a robot with a self aware AI would still be wrong


Do you really have reason why is not going to happen? Because I am yet to hear your reason why is not possible ? The only reason why is not happen yet is because the law prohibits humans genome modification. The other day scientist were talking about changing the law and making arguments about it. And when the law changes what is allow and is not. Companies are gonna go for any kind of modification that can make them money.


1. There is a huge difference between making animals albino and fucking messing with the genome to to specifically grow cat ears. Like thousands of miles. Secondly your literally proposing we go all designer babies and give give babies cat ears whether they want to or not.

2. Your literally fucking talking about genetically engineering catgirls so you can fuck them. The moment someone tries to defend this as ethical I will vomit.

3. You do realize the Money needed to mess with the genomes is literlly in the billions of dollars. Governments are the only people who can pay for this research. Sure big institutes can help out but thats entirely second to governments. Whether you like it or not you dont have enough Money to genetically engineer catgirls.


To answer first question. I more or less aware of what designer babies are but I could't care less about that topic. I meant fully grown humans BAKA. Just because you are adult does't mean your gene can't be modify.

Second question. BAKA. I think I never say it have to be sexual or any thing going in that direction. I just want catgirls, noting more or less. sights... Why do people assume always the worst.

3 question. You are more or less right here. But regardless of the group once there money there, it will get funds. All they need is incentive to give funds.
Posted 5/19/15

Firedestroyer wrote:


KarenAraragi wrote:


megahobbit wrote:


KarenAraragi wrote:



Pipe dream ? Umm... Let be honest here. Humans are creatures of desires are we not ? Genetics engineering, money Catgirls, money. If there a market for it, it will be made. Also there nothing that says catgirls can't be robots with a self-aware IA.


Yeah buddy keep telling yourself that if we try to engineer catgirls its gonna work. You should set up a catgirl engineering institute.

That being said... and I cant believe im fucking arguing this.
Owning a robot with a self aware AI would still be wrong.


You know we all ready clone animals right ? Also are you not aware that we all ready have the technology to modify the human genome. For example scientist have giving rat and other animals albinism. And they clearly say they can add and remove any gene they want. The only reason has not been done to humans is because of the law. And that can easily change any moment.

That not going to stop people from doing it. Money.

Owning a robot with a self aware AI would still be wrong


Do you really have reason why is not going to happen? Because I am yet to hear your reason why is not possible ? The only reason why is not happen yet is because the law prohibits humans genome modification. The other day scientist were talking about changing the law and making arguments about it. And when the law changes what is allow and is not. Companies are gonna go for any kind of modification that can make them money.


... How are catgirls going to make companies money?


Well people like owning unique thing.
35064 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F
Offline
Posted 5/19/15 , edited 5/19/15

papagolfwhiskey wrote:

Install a libertarian dictatorship as the world government.



megahobbit wrote:

Isnt that an oxymoron. Im pretty sure most libertarians I know would not take to kindly to a dictatorship.


This is where things get really, really weird: yes. A libertarian dictatorship is possible. You see, there are those who argue that the institution of self-ownership, in order to be truly realised, necessitates that it be possible to transfer one's self-ownership to another. These people will argue that the non-aggression principle demands only that such a transfer of self-ownership be voluntary, and that it does not forbid transferring one's self-ownership to another outright. This is the rationale applied by such people to justify slavery in a libertarian society so long as it is "voluntary", and it doesn't take much of a stretch of either the argument or one's imagination to apply such reasoning to societies and populations.

Imagine a society in which someone offers low-cost rental agreements, employment contracts, and insurance plans which have a rather long period between renewals and a clause which states that you're the property of your employer, landlord, and insurer (who are, by coincidence, either all the same person or a small group of people in collusion with one another) until the time is up. Oh, and you can't leave without permission, and there's no exit clause for the contract. You're stuck if you sign. That's kosher to such libertarians, and would have the essential political character of a dictatorship since the local hegemony would be built around a single person or a very small oligarchy which can exercise its will with no practically detectable mechanism for political opposition. Other libertarians would cry that self-ownership cannot be transferred, and that the sort I've described are just slavers trying to wrap their sickening deeds in pretty language about freedom.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.