First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  Last
Was 9/11 an inside job?
21466 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M
Online
Posted 8/2/15
Ridiculous
Posted 8/2/15

severticas wrote:

Didn't much fancy a bit of barbecue afterwards, did you?


Can't say I did
Ejanss 
16821 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 8/2/15 , edited 8/2/15
Also, you have to get to the basic question of "Why the World Trade Center, that up until then nobody had really thought was cool or iconic since the old 70's King Kong movie?--TWICE, counting that failed 90's garage bombing? Gee, how about the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, while you're at it?? "

Conspiracy Theorist: "Welllll, maybe, they were planning to real-estate rehab it anyway, and Bush didn't want to do permanent damage to the Statue of Liberty, or anything like that, so he had to pick something relatively unimportant that the quote, 'terrorists' would go after!"

- BZZT!! - WRONG.

There is a genuine 100% sand-in-the-shorts towel-headed Al Qaeda reason why they went after the WTC--twice--and it's so loopy and so far up the terrorists' objectified fantasy world about the Western countries, it could ONLY have come from politically-addled college students on a bit too much hashish.


That one's way too hard for Bush's little brain to have thought up. He'd have gone for corny cliche'd photo opportunities, and blown up a Navy aircraft carrier.
65923 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / NY
Offline
Posted 8/2/15
I know people who lost family members in this attack. OP is one sick puppy.
4315 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Arizona
Offline
Posted 8/2/15

sonic720 wrote:

I know people who lost family members in this attack. OP is one sick puppy.


How so friend?
20695 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
39 / M / Kansas
Offline
Posted 8/2/15
Guess it depends on what "inside job" means.
Did George Bush do it? No, of course not.
But the 9/11 commission was an utter failure.
I remember at least one of the original members left because "the investigation had been compromised".
Then, the official commission report said, basically, Saudi Arabi 100% innocent, blame Osama, invade Iraq.
Even tho the hijackers came from Saudi Arabia. And Osama wasn't in Iraq.

So whatever, a lot of suspicious stuff. But it's all in the past. The bigger concerns at the moment are 9/13 (according to a great deal of the Christian community) and 9/23 (according to the conspiracy theorists in general)
2046 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / D☻n'† AsK......
Offline
Posted 8/2/15
they need a fking reason to uhmm.. ...

but anyways.. yea
6120 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Texas
Offline
Posted 8/2/15
as time has gone on, i still think America had something to do with it. it was done much too perfect for it not to be that way. without all the dumb conspiracy videos you can still make a case America did it to themselves
4315 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Arizona
Offline
Posted 8/2/15
I'm glad too see some share the same opinion as I. At first I wasnt serious a bout the thread, but now seeing that people can be respectful and have well constructed opinions I feel I should take a more serious approach.
While I do not believe it was some NWO plan or anything to that extreme, I do think that there were too many coincidences and too many questionable occurrences for it to be as simple as the 9/11 commission led on. The fact that no investigaion into the funds that were ordered to be wired by the commander of the Pakistani ISI is just one example of ridiculously questionable actions taken following 9/11.
4315 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Arizona
Offline
Posted 8/2/15

Ejanss wrote:

Also, you have to get to the basic question of "Why the World Trade Center, that up until then nobody had really thought was cool or iconic since the old 70's King Kong movie?--TWICE, counting that failed 90's garage bombing? Gee, how about the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, while you're at it?? "

Conspiracy Theorist: "Welllll, maybe, they were planning to real-estate rehab it anyway, and Bush didn't want to do permanent damage to the Statue of Liberty, or anything like that, so he had to pick something relatively unimportant that the quote, 'terrorists' would go after!"

- BZZT!! - WRONG.

There is a genuine 100% sand-in-the-shorts towel-headed Al Qaeda reason why they went after the WTC--twice--and it's so loopy and so far up the terrorists' objectified fantasy world about the Western countries, it could ONLY have come from politically-addled college students on a bit too much hashish.


That one's way too hard for Bush's little brain to have thought up. He'd have gone for corny cliche'd photo opportunities, and blown up a Navy aircraft carrier.


You just explained why it would have been the perfect target as a false flag attack.
15084 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M
Offline
Posted 8/2/15
Usually on matters such as this, I tend to abide by Occam's Razor. The simplest answer is often the correct answer. Their are far too many complications and moving parts in these conspiracy theories for it to be considered anywhere near the simplest answer.

On this particular matter, I certainly think that the Bush administration used the event to further their cause, however the suggestion that the attack was carried out by the will of the United States government and all the spin offs of that theory (the towers were actually blown up, the planes were empty etc) just seems ridiculous. Even the idea that the government was able to cover something as huge as this up just doesn't mesh with what we have seen multiple times from the US government and with the knowledge of their shaky ground with keeping secrets, the idea that they would orchestrate such a plot would be so tremendously high risk that it would not be worth the gain.
Ejanss 
16821 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 8/2/15 , edited 8/2/15

sundin13 wrote:
On this particular matter, I certainly think that the Bush administration used the event to further their cause, however the suggestion that the attack was carried out by the will of the United States government and all the spin offs of that theory (the towers were actually blown up, the planes were empty etc) just seems ridiculous. Even the idea that the government was able to cover something as huge as this up just doesn't mesh with what we have seen multiple times from the US government and with the knowledge of their shaky ground with keeping secrets, the idea that they would orchestrate such a plot would be so tremendously high risk that it would not be worth the gain.


Again, it's the same problem as the JFK conspiracy:
We just CAN'T BELIEVE we left ourselves open enough for a bunch of minimum-wage loonies who knew how to exploit a few missing security guards at a warehouse or airport, so it had to have been so complex a plot as to elude our genius!
Sort of if you left your wallet on the subway, and were so embarrassed by it, you came home and told the story of how it was stolen from you after a deadly battle with twelve ninjas...

And again, the Bush administration was Republican; they watch a lot of television and they're not exactly creative.
At that point in time, the 90's garage bombing was still coin of the realm for NYC domestic terrorist attack news footage--If they wanted to organize a "terror stunt" to justify the invasion, they'd have just copied the 90's garage bombing again, just so they could keep the building up but show all the SWAT teams in action, and make it just exactly like that cool Denzel Washington movie! And make the terrorists cooler, with more decadent-American insults, like the ones in Die Hard!
Blowing up the whole building??--Eww, that's too Oklahoma City, people would just be too disturbed; that's for the crazy redneck militias, not the cool international terrorists that Chuck Norris goes after!
12206 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
49 / M / New England, USA
Offline
Posted 8/2/15 , edited 8/2/15
Do I think our government could ever do something like this? Read up on the denials of Agent Orange usage during Vietnam on our own troops if you think politicians wouldn't sacrifice U.S. Citizens for their own gains. Do I think 9/11 was a conspiracy? No. I have to agree fully with Sundin13 on this for exactly the same reasons he pointed out. The Government had all the facts of what actually happened before it happened (according to cbsnews among other sources) but unfortunately had many other possible scenarios to look at as well. It was a case of too many possibilities with too little manpower to cover.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-bush-knew-before-sept-11/

I think the weirdest part of this for me was the X-Files connection.

https://www.corbettreport.com/articles/20080225_gunmen_911.htm
13020 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 8/2/15
one day the secret society of lizard people will reveal themselves and only then we will know the truth... but by that point our fates will be sealed...








KUSH DID 911
11291 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
13 / F / California
Offline
Posted 8/2/15


Gettin' a bit silly in here.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.