First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
Post Reply Sexbots
2988 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / Fort Worth, Texas
Offline
Posted 11/16/15
Sexbots, there has been moral and ethical discussions around them since they went mainstream after their VR reveal. It looks pretty great.

Sexbots objectively have no downsides. Single males would benefit from their existence, it would finally be possible to marry, sex and reproduce with any waifu of their choice.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/16/sexbots-why-women-should-panic/

You can't really search "Sexbots" without getting a bunch of misandrists articles and "talks" about ethical issues and morality -- which don't factor in here at all in my opinion.

Basically, the advancements in technology have brought about the artificial womb.... Which is still fortunately(or unfortunately depending on who you ask) still a long ways away. But what could be so unethical about a android that is capable of sex and bearing children? The point of technology is to overcome nature and biology. You could say women and men already exists so there's no need for the androids. But we must take into account men and women don't get along for the most part in this day and age. And there's plenty of men who already "checked out" of society, they largely still might want sex and kids as well, and this advancement in technology would allow him to get both sex and children without having to get a woman do either of those things.

The first real Sexbots won't have artificial wombs of course, but they will eventually.

If you read my other topic, you'd know that female hypergamy is a thing and it's more rampant than it's ever has been. So androids do have a very sizable market they could hit.

Even when all these benefits to people, there are still people suggesting that Sexbots with or without artificial wombs are cancerous for society and that it will lead to a grim dystopia. This makes no sense, but here are their arguments... Wanna guess which gender has a bigger problem with Sexbots? Take a guess.

Argument 1.

Dr. Richardson says...

"We think that the creation of such robots will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women," she said.


First off, homosexual men, heterosexual women, and homosexual women are generally not interested in Sexbots. Second, there are no children sexbots(yet) so that's stupid. And she brought up the "terrors" of traditional gender roles.

You know, those roles that had men and women live happier lives?

It's easy to write off Richardson as a nutjob, and she is. She's a "robot ethicist"

Lol

Yeah, nice try with that misandry. Better luck next time?

Argument 2.

Here, we have more "ethical" issues from Jincey Lumpkin. Now, to put her into perspective, she's a misandrist feminist from the extreme left talking about a male sextoy. Brace yourselves for the mental gymnastics.

She is implying rape can happen to robot.

Yes, she's implying that since robots cannot give consent, you are a rapist. No joke. That's how dumb this bitch is. It's a TEDx talk. Not a TED talk. Don't believe me?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nxVBjfHzdI4

She does ask a thought provoking question she doesn't answer. At what point does advanced A.I become... Human? Here's my answer. Never you Feminazi.

Every time male sexuality is a focal point of anything, you can expect feminists/women demonize it and make sure everyone sees it as wrong. Why are robots for cooking pancakes or assembly or blow dryers, etc. why aren't those considered slavery? Is your phone a slave? How about your PC? Seriously? Are vibrators slaves as well?

Jincey Lumpkin -- like every other gynocentric minded being should exclude herself from talking about or making a fuss about an issue that has nothing to do with her. If men would rather have androids over real women, who's fault is that really? Besides, alongside artificial wombs and female Sexbots. There's artificial sperm and male Sexbots as well. So why are women in general viewing Sexbots and biological bypassing as "bad" or immoral?

Granted, female interest in artificial sperm and male Sexbots are far, far lower than male interest in these things. It's currently unknown if artificial sperm will work in a real woman but it really doesn't matter that much if it doesn't. Sperm donors exist.

Argument 3.

http://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/kathy-gyngell-sexodus-anger-needs-to-channelled-before-it-explodes/

I linked this in another topic, and she specifically mentions a "test-tube gender less baby world" as a bad thing. Which it is.

At one point, mainstream went full on mental asylum and tried to believe that men and women were equivalents and equals in everything and they're interchangeable and gender is a social construct, blah blah, etc.

Now that even some Feminist and SJWs are like. "Okay, genders are biological and not man made social constructs." Most people agree that's bad. But everything other than this one part should be disregarded. Kathy Gyncell is a conservative, she's right minded and she's specifically calling to right minded women and men. MGTOW, MRAs, PUAs and Red Pill Men are not right minded and they will not be responsive to anything a rightist has to say, especially not a right woman.

Hell, just being a woman in either of the groups I just mentioned has them do background checks on you and put you through tests you're guaranteed to fail before they even entertain you.

Well, that's the end of the topic main body.


Do you think there are problems to be had from Sexbots capable of companionship and reproducing? Is there any social, moral or ethical concerns?

My actual opinions on the matter aren't within the main body, I actually don't like Sexbots, I'm fine with their concept, but I dislike their representation of a symptom. So while I understand their usefulness and audience, I actually hope they don't become fully realized and I think they are cancerous, but for different reasons. I actually dislike anything that allows males to bypass female interaction in any way shape or form.

But what do you think?


8022 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / florida
Offline
Posted 11/16/15
im calling it, this is too much...... i see this short lived. pushing the box too far....
2988 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / Fort Worth, Texas
Offline
Posted 11/16/15

lukedollo wrote:

im calling it, this is too much...... i see this short lived. pushing the box too far....


What are you referring too exactly?
Posted 11/16/15
People have some ethical issue with any little thing.
As long as it's not hurting anyone but yourself you should be allowed to do what you want.
17456 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
(´◔౪◔)✂❤
Offline
Posted 11/16/15
ಠ_ಠ
2988 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / Fort Worth, Texas
Offline
Posted 11/16/15
^

Well, these need a bit more of an explanation, I'd explain it like always, but I'd like to think what middle leftists think of Sexbots.

@LukeDollo, you're probably used to PC and Social Justice agenda filtering generalizations to make sure no one is offended except hetero white men or just hetero men. You'll have to avoid my posts and topics since explaining things in a way to take everyone's feelings into account would remove the purpose of talking at all or it would muddle the point in the first place or make it unclear if I treated everyone as a gray blob. For anyone else reading, be careful as you might get assassinated by your own emotions if you're not used to being scrutinized or objectively examined.
15959 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / Cold and High
Offline
Posted 11/16/15 , edited 11/16/15
SAW TEDx
I am out of here..
they also supported alot of BS through out the time, don't know what really "good" they have done..

else COME HERE MY LITTLE BOTS! *groupe hug*
SHIITT.....


but sexbots would be more of a personal problem, and I guess more depressive minds would start going and the feeling of no "soul" (either knowing that "person" is a bot and does this and that)
Yeah could see the dark corners expoliting these possiblites also awfull killer program/viruses (since so much is online)
717 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
49 / M / UK
Offline
Posted 11/16/15 , edited 11/16/15
Seriously, this shit can't happen too soon for me:

15959 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / Cold and High
Offline
Posted 11/16/15 , edited 11/16/15

BurningBlueEye wrote:


2988 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / Fort Worth, Texas
Offline
Posted 11/16/15

Freddy96NO wrote:

SAW TEDx
I am out of here..
they also supported alot of BS through out the time, don't know what really "good" they have done..

else COME HERE MY LITTLE BOTS! *groupe hug*
SHIITT.....


but sexbots would be more of a personal problem, and I guess more depressive minds would start going and the feeling of no "soul" (either knowing that "person" is a bot and does this and that)
Yeah could see the dark corners expoliting these possiblites also awfull killer program/viruses (since so much is online)


Sexbots, much like Windows, Mac OSX or any Game Console... Probably wouldn't be open source and wouldn't let you fiddle with code.

Sexbots(female model) are made with the intent to be a traditional woman in use so they wouldn't give them the strength to actually hurt someone anyway.
46429 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Sweden
Online
Posted 11/16/15
I can't say for anyone else, but I would NOT bang a bot... There are already "sexbots" and they are such a small business that most people don't even know about them...
2988 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / Fort Worth, Texas
Offline
Posted 11/16/15

TheOmegaForce70941 wrote:

I can't say for anyone else, but I would NOT bang a bot... There are already "sexbots" and they are such a small business that most people don't even know about them...


Automated fleshlights, vibrators and RealDolls are not "Sexbots"

Sexbots are characterized by their human form and A.I intelligence.
15959 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / Cold and High
Offline
Posted 11/16/15

Magical-Soul wrote:
Sexbots are characterized by their human form and A.I intelligence.
they allready tried small verisons of that.. in amercia.
but yes not as advanced as you think, well little money for such special parts (to look good) and the wires etc to work right.

it worked but was ugly and not that great I can try to find that video about the guy, think they called it the first sexbot?

17688 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / B.C, Canada
Offline
Posted 11/16/15
I hardly think there is any ethical question about these so called sexbots. If they or when they come to a fully realised existence they will be constructs meant to serve the will of their creators |(i.e us). I don't believe in the concept of granting rights and privileges to sentient A.I any more then to a non sentient machine like my bloody toaster. That being said I rather believe in the social and moral concerns this would bring up. As this robots/androids would give yet another gateway to bypass human interaction altogether.

And of course say what you will but the day you can make a machine this complex and capable of the fine motor control and logical processing the act of sex would be is the day the Military really gets some toys to play with. As any hardware platform and A.I program capable of that could very well be up gunned so to speak to serve as frontline combat units. And you know that old saying about animals tasting blood. Then there is the opinion of the A.I itself to think of, whose to say it won't go all Skynet on us?
2988 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / Fort Worth, Texas
Offline
Posted 11/16/15

Freddy96NO wrote:


Magical-Soul wrote:
Sexbots are characterized by their human form and A.I intelligence.
they allready tried small verisons of that.. in amercia.
but yes not as advanced as you think, well little money for such special parts (to look good) and the wires etc to work right.

it worked but was ugly and not that great I can try to find that video about the guy, think they called it the first sexbot?



The first plane didn't work very well either.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.