First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next  Last
Post Reply The Wall (Yes, it's a woman topic)
Posted 11/25/15

Ryulightorb wrote:

Not Naive know from experience.

At least looks are the last thing that matter when you love someone i can tell you that from experience.


"Oh ok, you know from experience, I must be totally in the wrong then."
Either the person you love was already somewhat attractive, or your "smv" was low so you settled for someone else with similar "smv". Am I using that thing right? If they were ugly, you wouldn't be dating/fucking, you'd "just be friends". I could tell you all this stuff without really knowing red pill things. S:

But maybe I'm overly cynical who knows eh.
2496 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Baton Rouge, Loui...
Offline
Posted 11/25/15

PrinceJudar wrote:


Kid2daKrazx wrote:

can someone explain to me what this "red pill" thing is?

Is that yet another new category for sex stuff?


See the other topic on websites you're ashamed of visiting.


I just did and I got more random terminology like "chocolate misogyny" and all this other jargon.

I'm just gonna assume that it means "people who can get laid" which y'know...doesn't need it's own term.
Posted 11/25/15

Kid2daKrazx wrote:

I just did and I got more random terminology like "chocolate misogyny" and all this other jargon.

I'm just gonna assume that it means "people who can get laid" which y'know...doesn't need it's own term.


From what I know they call it sexual strategy.
It's called "red pill" as a reference to waking up to reality from the lies that gynocentrist society brought you up with. Yeah lol.
3259 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / Fenix, AZ
Offline
Posted 11/25/15
As I've aged I've started to like older women more, not necessarily older than I am but more towards a little younger than I am. So 21-23 are the most attractive to me. And if I'm not mistaken that's a pretty normal thing to be attracted to people who are in your age group, whether you're 17 or 71

The reason these people think that 15-19 is "the wall" is because they're stuck in high school.
22653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 11/25/15 , edited 11/25/15

haikinka wrote:

From what I know they call it sexual strategy.
It's called "red pill" as a reference to waking up to reality from the lies that gynocentrist society brought you up with. Yeah lol.


Basically

2496 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Baton Rouge, Loui...
Offline
Posted 11/25/15

haikinka wrote:


Kid2daKrazx wrote:

I just did and I got more random terminology like "chocolate misogyny" and all this other jargon.

I'm just gonna assume that it means "people who can get laid" which y'know...doesn't need it's own term.


From what I know they call it sexual strategy.
It's called "red pill" as a reference to waking up to reality from the lies that gynocentrist society brought you up with. Yeah lol.


thanks jake-a-chu

-throws pokeball-

gonna get you this time
20843 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Bundaberg, Queens...
Offline
Posted 11/25/15 , edited 11/25/15

haikinka wrote:


Ryulightorb wrote:

Not Naive know from experience.

At least looks are the last thing that matter when you love someone i can tell you that from experience.


"Oh ok, you know from experience, I must be totally in the wrong then."
Either the person you love was already somewhat attractive, or your "smv" was low so you settled for someone else with similar "smv". Am I using that thing right? If they were ugly, you wouldn't be dating/fucking, you'd "just be friends". I could tell you all this stuff without really knowing red pill things. S:

But maybe I'm overly cynical who knows eh.



my smv isn't low i just don't care for sex appeal or attractiveness.

It's nice to have sure but it's not important in any way or form.


I have dated alot of women who look amazing and stunning these women were actually complimented and hit on because of there looks so there "SMV" as there putting it as was high.

I'm ok with settling with anyone whether there the most drop dead gorgeous woman in the world or the ugliest.
Looks are a secondary matter when it comes to love and dating.

I'm not going to just be friends with someone just because they are ugly that would be rather stupid.

Then again most men need to have sexual attraction and find there partner attractive to date them so ......i probably shouldn't be so surprised the majority of people are quite well to put it...irrational.

It must suck to only like someone you find attractive it's so irrational.

the important things for a relationship are love , personality and intellect.

Looks are optional.

Atleast for me i pity those who don't find looks optional.

Not saying my experience is the same for all but i was merely pointing out that was the logic the post her was using "my experience is x so the truth must be x"
Posted 11/25/15

PrinceJudar wrote:

Basically



Woman have been puppeteering society from the shadows all along!!!
22653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 11/25/15 , edited 11/25/15

haikinka wrote:

"Oh ok, you know from experience, I must be totally in the wrong then."
Either the person you love was already somewhat attractive, or your "smv" was low so you settled for someone else with similar "smv". Am I using that thing right? If they were ugly, you wouldn't be dating/fucking, you'd "just be friends". I could tell you all this stuff without really knowing red pill things. S:

But maybe I'm overly cynical who knows eh.


Fell in love with someone and didn't even know what he looked like at the time of. There's a point some people just don't get a shit anymore.




haikinka wrote:

Woman have been puppeteering society from the shadows all along!!!


You didn't know!?!? We're also shapeshifters! Don't you dare call the Winchesters!

Posted 11/25/15

Ryulightorb wrote:

my smv isn't low i just don't care for sex appeal or attractiveness.

It's nice to have sure but it's not important in any way or form.


I have dated alot of women who look amazing and stunning these women were actually complimented and hit on because of there looks so there "SMV" as there putting it as was high.

I'm ok with settling with anyone whether there the most drop dead gorgeous woman in the world or the ugliest.
Looks are a secondary matter when it comes to love and dating.

I'm not going to just be friends with someone just because they are ugly that would be rather stupid.

Then again most men need to have sexual attraction and find there partner attractive to date them so ......i probably shouldn't be so surprised the majority of people are quite well to put it simply dumb and i pity them.

It must suck to only like someone you find attractive it's so irrational.


I mean, giving you the benefit of the doubt that you're not just lying, it would be safer to say you're the exception rather than the rule. If you yourself have a high smv, why would you go for someone with low smv. You could just get someone that is hot and smart S: IT's like buying a shitty tiny house because it has "personality" even though you could afford to live inside the Louvre.
So as a person that has dated many attractive people, how many ugly ones have you hm?
2096 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
16 / F
Offline
Posted 11/25/15
I swear everything that the OP creates in the forums is wrong and more than mildly offensive.
Posted 11/25/15 , edited 11/25/15

PrinceJudar wrote:

Fell in love with someone and didn't even know what he looked like at the time of. There's a point some people just don't get a shit anymore.



Hey I've been in the same situation so it's not like I'm clueless. But I also don't have many opportunities since I'm an ugly social recluse. I don't think that I would have chosen an internet relationship over a real one had I had options, as harsh as that may sound.

In the end though I'm just talking about maybe's. Maybe I would have chosen someone I don't know the look of anyway. If's and butts.
22653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 11/25/15

haikinka wrote:

Hey I've been in the same situation so it's not like I'm clueless. But I also don't have many opportunities since I'm an ugly social recluse. I don't think that I would have chosen an internet relationship over a real one had I had options, as harsh as that may sound.

In the end though I'm just talking about maybe's. Maybe I would have chosen someone I don't know the look of anyway. If's and butts.


You might still, yah never know. I had option to do so.

Touche.


First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.