First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next  Last
Post Reply The Wall (Yes, it's a woman topic)
3326 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Germany
Offline
Posted 11/25/15

Allie_cat418 wrote:

I swear everything that the OP creates in the forums is wrong and more than mildly offensive.


True dat.
Banned
21034 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Bundaberg, Queens...
Online
Posted 11/25/15

haikinka wrote:


Ryulightorb wrote:

my smv isn't low i just don't care for sex appeal or attractiveness.

It's nice to have sure but it's not important in any way or form.


I have dated alot of women who look amazing and stunning these women were actually complimented and hit on because of there looks so there "SMV" as there putting it as was high.

I'm ok with settling with anyone whether there the most drop dead gorgeous woman in the world or the ugliest.
Looks are a secondary matter when it comes to love and dating.

I'm not going to just be friends with someone just because they are ugly that would be rather stupid.

Then again most men need to have sexual attraction and find there partner attractive to date them so ......i probably shouldn't be so surprised the majority of people are quite well to put it simply dumb and i pity them.

It must suck to only like someone you find attractive it's so irrational.


I mean, giving you the benefit of the doubt that you're not just lying, it would be safer to say you're the exception rather than the rule. If you yourself have a high smv, why would you go for someone with low smv. You could just get someone that is hot and smart S: IT's like buying a shitty tiny house because it has "personality" even though you could afford to live inside the Louvre.
So as a person that has dated many attractive people, how many ugly ones have you hm?


i have dated a few ugly ones about two or three?

I have to say the ones that were "ugly" were alot better people then the ones who were "Hot"

Why bother dating someone who is hot if there personality isn't any good.

I'm not going to go for someone hot and smart when i'm inlove with someone already that would be irrational.

i have fallen for people before without knowing how they even look there is honestly no reason to go for someone with a high "SMV" anymore then someone with a low "SMV"
7597 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Ark-La-Tex
Offline
Posted 11/25/15
Is anyone else disappointed this thread is about some gender war conspiracy nonsense and not the Pink Floyd album?
2496 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Baton Rouge, Loui...
Offline
Posted 11/25/15 , edited 11/25/15

geauxtigers1989 wrote:

Is anyone else disappointed this thread is about some gender war conspiracy nonsense and not the Pink Floyd album?


I thought I was the only one but in her defense, she did have it in parentheses that it was gonna be about something else.

That and it not being in the music category was a bit of a dead giveaway.

but I figure this is a good time to try to catch Haikinka so I'm staying in.
Posted 11/25/15

Ryulightorb wrote:

i have dated a few ugly ones about two or three?

I have to say the ones that were "ugly" were alot better people then the ones who were "Hot"

I'm not going to go for someone hot and smart when i'm inlove with someone already that would be irrational.

i have fallen for people before without knowing how they even look there is honestly no reason to go for someone with a high "SMV" anymore then someone with a low "SMV"


Still feel like you're talking ideologies rather than reality, but if you truly believe that then I have nothing more to say.
145767 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / F / Overlord's Castle
Offline
Posted 11/25/15 , edited 11/25/15
The wall does not exist. I am 25 and look hotter and get hit on more than I ever did when I was in my teens. (Although everyone always thinks I am only 15........) Regardless, my point is that it depends on the person when they "bloom" so you can't really set an age for it.
Banned
21034 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Bundaberg, Queens...
Online
Posted 11/25/15

haikinka wrote:


Ryulightorb wrote:

i have dated a few ugly ones about two or three?

I have to say the ones that were "ugly" were alot better people then the ones who were "Hot"

I'm not going to go for someone hot and smart when i'm inlove with someone already that would be irrational.

i have fallen for people before without knowing how they even look there is honestly no reason to go for someone with a high "SMV" anymore then someone with a low "SMV"


Still feel like you're talking ideologies rather than reality, but if you truly believe that then I have nothing more to say.



Reality is "SMV" is not important for anything other then lust and sex.

SMV is not a defining factor in a relationship.
Posted 11/25/15 , edited 11/25/15

Ryulightorb wrote:

SMV is not the only defining factor in a relationship.


I'll happily agree with you there.
2496 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Baton Rouge, Loui...
Offline
Posted 11/25/15 , edited 11/25/15
As an ugly man, I'd like to point out that the dating scene is practically ruled by women since they get more attractive each time and they can determine a relationship with a simple "yay" or "nay".

If anyone has hit "the wall", it's men that are deemed unattractive.

Personal experience.
Posted 11/25/15
what about like cougars many men are attracted to older women .
8701 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / Definitely not EU
Offline
Posted 11/25/15

Kid2daKrazx wrote:

As an ugly man...

If anyone has hit "the wall", it's men that are deemed unattractive.

Personal experience.


Uhhh nooo... don't project yourself over the rest of us other guys.
2496 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Baton Rouge, Loui...
Offline
Posted 11/25/15

DanteVSTheWorld wrote:


Kid2daKrazx wrote:

As an ugly man...

If anyone has hit "the wall", it's men that are deemed unattractive.

Personal experience.


Uhhh nooo... don't project yourself over the rest of us other guys.


are you saying that I called you unattractive because that wasn't the intent. I'm just saying that if a girl finds a guy unattractive (in any way), they won't give them the time of day.
11891 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Finland
Offline
Posted 11/25/15 , edited 11/25/15
You don't need the "red pill" to realize that generally men tend to prefer younger more attractive woman. Not sure if I believe the 15-19 peak though, seems to be many years higher for some people.

Based on my own observations, "the wall" doesn't exist. I know some people who have met in their 30s sometimes with a younger man and even people who had children in their 40s, not that you should leave it that late.
Attractiveness goes down sure but there's no particular golden years or an exact wall where you're no longer attractive.

EDIT: well, I'm not sure what this is even about anymore <.<
747 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M
Offline
Posted 11/25/15
Age and looks don't always go hand in hand. I've seen a significant amount of women in their 30's that look far more attractive than some girls in their 20's. No doubt looks are as important as one's personality, but it shouldn't be a deal breaker unless you find that person unattractive.
11622 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
40 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 11/25/15

Kira0309 wrote:

The wall does not exist. I am 25 and look hotter and get hit on more than I ever did when I was in my teens. (Although everyone always thinks I am only 15........) Regardless, my point is that it depends on the person when they "bloom" so you can't really set an age for it.


Whether it exists or not wouldn't make a difference anyways. People will view things differently and place different values on everything. You make a good point about when a person blooms. A lot of people mature in various ways later than others, as well as earlier. Then there's always people who simply look far and away nothing like their given age (myself being a prime example).

All in all this wall bs sounds like just that. BS. Still funny to read through though at least.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.