First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next  Last
Post Reply Don't hate women for being women
2988 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / Fort Worth, Texas
Offline
Posted 12/2/15 , edited 12/5/15
Alright, so probably the most interesting red pill topic in awhile.

Here we go!


r/theredpill


TL;DR- Don't hate women for what they are, for what they've done against you nor over what they have the propensity to do to you. Blame the society that allow them to behave in such a way both freely and without consequence.

_______________________

"Don't Hate Women For Being Women"
_______________________


To those of you still suffering through the anger phase and to those who still elicit some hostility or resentment towards women in your lives, I implore you, hear me out.

Don't hate women for what they are, for what they've done against you nor over what they have the propensity to do to you.

Women are women; all women are like that, they've have always been like that and they'll always be like that. Such Is Their Nature.

Your angry not because of what women are or have done or can do or could do but because you've only just found out.

You may feel cheated, feel lied to, feel scorned by every women you've ever come in contact with and feel distrust towards any woman you may encounter.

But they haven't lied. You just didn't know the truth until now.

And how could you have learned? There is no purely objective discussion on the Nature of Women beyond here. You're standing in the last bastion of man enlightenment.

But now you know. The Nature of women is spelled out for you across a few webpages and computer pixels. It's like reading the definition of a word you'd never known. Once you have it, that's it.

Same goes for the Nature of women. There's only the one definition, once you've got it you're set and, should you forget, the dictionary's always here.

You may believe they've kept the truth from you in spite of you.

While they may have kept the truth, they've done so in some frame or fashion because they acting within what they thought was mutual benefit, you as a loyal beta and her as your item of worship.

In short, a beta makes a better beta when they are ignorant or in opposition to Alphas. To her, you made a good beta, so the truth stayed hidden. "For your own good", she might say.

Like how a leader might hide the truth from his followers to avoid mass panic. An ignorant follower is easier to lead.

What's more, most of these tactics are operand subconscious, drilled into their very biological make-up.

They act upon their self-perservatory instincts. They manipulate through emotion and sexuality to get what they want. Due to the lack of the male's physicality to reach their own ends, it's in their nature to do so covertly.

So then tell me: If you found out today that mosquitoes were the cause of those itchy red bumps you'd sometimes get, do you get angry at every mosquito you've ever encountered or everyone you will from then on?

Of course not.

Mosquitoes have been biting long before you and will continue long after. You can't hate a mosquito for doing what mosquitoes do.

So, with all of that being said, consider a Wolf hunting a Rabbit.

Say the Wolf hunts, chases, outruns and bites the Rabbit.

It would be foolhardy for the rabbit to hold grudge against the Wolf.
___________________________________
A wolf is a wolf. Wolves hunt. Wolves eat rabbits. Such is Their Nature.

Truth is, the Rabbit was slow or didn't comprehend the Nature of the Wolf.

It would also be foolhardy of the Rabbit to hold grudge once he learned of the Wolf or feel resentment over how much time he'd wasted not preparing for the inevitable chase.

The Wolf has always been there, whether the rabbit had realized it or not. An angry Rabbit is still a slow Rabbit.

Anger does not make him faster nor does it change the Nature of the Wolf.

The epiphany of the Wolf should bring relief to the rabbit, not anger. Should he gone without knowing, he'd surely have been eaten eventually.

And the Wolf will not wait for the rabbit to get faster. "Fair" is not a factor in Nature. A faster rabbit makes for a harder meal. The Wolf enjoys hunting slower rabbits. It makes for an abundant supply of food.

But, should the Wolf come upon the Rabbit again, whose now knows of the Wolf and trained for the chase, even though the wolf may struggle and eventually lose the rabbit, both will benefit from the chase itself.

Both have become faster, the Rabbit for escaping even faster wolves and the Wolf for catching faster rabbits. A benefit of oppositions.

The Wolf learns and adapts, chasing fast rabbits for exercise and eating slow rabbits for nourishment.

[Or, outside the analogy, betas -the slower- for validation and Alphas -the faster- for sex, respectively]

And the Rabbit learns, adapts and becomes so fast that the Wolf and all other wolves become an afterthought. He lives a long, happy life with no fears or restraints.
____________________________________
So don't hate women for being women.

They've always been that way. Such Is Their Nature. So with that said, learn their Nature, adapt to it and women will become but an afterthought.

Only then can you live a happy, fulfilling life.

Until next time.


This is a common topic amongst red pills/MGTOW, is to not hate them for their nature, as anything else. If you stayed engaged enough to read the whole thing, you should ask yourself.

Do you hate mice for stealing cheese?

Do you hate bears for eating out the garbage?

Do you hate sharks for attacking people?

These are all examples that you would normally see MGTOW like TFM or Sandman say, to not be a misogynist for such an idiotic reason. This is the first pro woman topic we've seen on the red pill for awhile now, and this really sets the mood for anyone who wants to call a red pill/MGTOW a misogynist. As they explain they are not.

They're saying not to blame women for responding to their biological predispositions, as it's the same as going for hot chicks as a man. Hypergamy to a woman is equal to sexual attraction for a man, so don't call "gold digger" for a perfectly healthy young girl going for a well off man or for provision and security as men go for the same thing when it comes to looks.

Maybe this topic will refresh some of your minds and make you rethink hating people(or just women) for their biological imperatives. I've never been one to call "gold digger" and I definitely won't now considering that it's perfectly normal for them to do that exact thing.

Hopefully this also clears up people conceptions that I just hate women somehow. Which I don't and this thread explains it perfectly: you wouldn't hate a homeless man for stealing your sandwich off your porch table. And you wouldn't hate a kitten for biting your fish and running away with it.

Alright! Read the story and hit the comments! This was a bitch to format.

Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3v1j7k/dont_hate_women_for_being_women/

22653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 12/2/15 , edited 12/5/15
You don't hate women. However, you do think women are inferior to men.

Hate has little to do with your problem.


7553 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Ark-La-Tex
Offline
Posted 12/2/15
You sure are a glutton for punishment.
14924 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / San Francisco
Offline
Posted 12/2/15 , edited 12/5/15
Um. No. One. Cares.

Seriously...this was the dumbest thing I've read in a while. You're basically comparing women and their desire to find a financially secure mate as being more than an animal's impulse to eat.

Here's the thing....a woman looking for a stable mate is no more disgusting than a financially stable man looking for a much younger and attractive woman to mate with. To an extent, it's a financial transaction between two consenting adults - the older, wealthier male wants regular sex, possible offspring and bragging rights with friends, while the woman is looking for financial security, both now and, with kids, for a minimum of 18 years.
Posted 12/2/15
I don't hate women, I hate biological drones.
11622 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
40 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 12/2/15 , edited 12/5/15
I hate everybody.
Posted 12/2/15 , edited 12/5/15
*sighs*
2988 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / Fort Worth, Texas
Offline
Posted 12/2/15

PrinceJudar wrote:

You don't hate women. However, you do think women are inferior to men.

Hate has little to do with your problem.




My personal "problem" or "problem" in general?
22653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 12/2/15 , edited 12/5/15

dotsforlife wrote:

I hate everybody.


I'll put a quarter in that can.


Posted 12/2/15 , edited 12/5/15

Akage-chan wrote:
You're basically comparing women and their desire to find a financially secure mate as being more than an animal's impulse to eat.

Here's the thing....a woman looking for a stable mate is no more disgusting than a financially stable man looking for a much younger and attractive woman to mate with. To an extent, it's a financial transaction between two consenting adults - the older, wealthier male wants regular sex, possible offspring and bragging rights with friends, while the woman is looking for financial security, both now and, with kids, for a minimum of 18 years.


She never said it was disgusting, just that it's biology lol. Literally says don't hate them for being "gold diggers" like you wouldn't hate a baby for shitting.
11622 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
40 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 12/2/15 , edited 12/5/15

PrinceJudar wrote:


dotsforlife wrote:

I hate everybody.


I'll put a quarter in that can.




It's all about giving this month.

So here's what I got you. Merry Christmas to you! Make sure you treasure this. Oooo shiny.

Posted 12/2/15 , edited 12/5/15
It's that time again.

*grabs popcorn*
42415 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / F / New Jersey, USA
Offline
Posted 12/2/15 , edited 12/5/15

dotsforlife wrote:

I hate everybody.


What did I do?
2988 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / Fort Worth, Texas
Offline
Posted 12/2/15

haikinka wrote:


Akage-chan wrote:
You're basically comparing women and their desire to find a financially secure mate as being more than an animal's impulse to eat.

Here's the thing....a woman looking for a stable mate is no more disgusting than a financially stable man looking for a much younger and attractive woman to mate with. To an extent, it's a financial transaction between two consenting adults - the older, wealthier male wants regular sex, possible offspring and bragging rights with friends, while the woman is looking for financial security, both now and, with kids, for a minimum of 18 years.


She never said it was disgusting, just that it's biology lol. Literally says don't hate them for being "gold diggers" like you wouldn't hate a baby for shitting.


You read the entire post! Yay!

I'm honestly not sure how people are reacting negatively to this red pill topic. It's actually pro woman and somehow they're still upset? Is discussing women objectively at all just seen as inherently misogynist?

That was rhetorical, of course it is!

But I thought even Crunchyroll would get this message clearly.
5035 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Abyss
Offline
Posted 12/2/15
"The funny thing is, in any other circumstance, you might have had a point there. Except my boss is a woman, I was a chick in the 40's, I hate everyone equally, and there's no one alive who could comprehend my sexual preference. So in other words, Miss van Winkle, ch-ch-ch-CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE."
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.