First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next  Last
Have you read The Satanic Bible?
15742 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M
Offline
Posted 12/11/15 , edited 12/12/15

GrandMasterTime wrote:

Wiki is generally fine, I've cross checked information dozens of times between other sites, books and wiki. They are generally consistent more times than not. You can always check the sources below if you're that worried. It's just something schools have drummed into us.


In college we are taught that wiki is not a credible source due to the fact anyone can edit it. Not one professor Iv seen ever accepted wiki as a source. Only things like .edu and ect.
13618 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / Australia
Offline
Posted 12/11/15 , edited 12/12/15

KarenAraragi wrote:

I mean the book.


Get someone to summarize the content of the book which is basically the "book". Then I can become critical and mean, so many ways around it. Okay time to stop being dumb (Myself) and answer the question, No I haven't read the book nor do I want to as it does not interest me at all.
2553 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M / California
Offline
Posted 12/11/15
Smoke meth, hail Satan
Posted 12/11/15 , edited 12/12/15

descloud wrote:

No I think I am. Satan's goal has to do with the suffering of innocents,. Why in the world you support this is beyond me.


Don't make me bring your own bible. Do I need to remind you, that your own god ask one his believer to kill his own son. Don't be a Hippocratic with me. Also when did I ever say I believe any of it? The only thing you are criticizing is your own version of Satan.
13618 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / Australia
Offline
Posted 12/11/15 , edited 12/12/15

descloud wrote:

In college we are taught that wiki is not a credible source due to the fact anyone can edit it. Not one professor Iv seen ever accepted wiki as a source. Only things like .edu and ect.


Yep I'm just saying that you can't outright deny something linked from Wikipedia merely because it came from there. Just check the sources from where the information is being expressed from and check there; not hard.
7509 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Ponce, P.R.
Offline
Posted 12/11/15
“When a Satanist commits a wrong, he realizes that is it natural to make a mistake―and if he is truly sorry about what he has done, he will learn from it and take care not to do the same thing again. If he is not honestly sorry about what he has done, and knows he will do the same thing over and over, he has no business confessing and asking forgiveness in the first place.
― Anton Szandor LaVey, The Satanic Bible

Haven't read it, but i like this part.
Posted 12/11/15 , edited 12/12/15

descloud wrote:

In college we are taught that wiki is not a credible source due to the fact anyone can edit it. Not one professor Iv seen ever accepted wiki as a source. Only things like .edu and ect.

That's why you check the sources the wiki lists instead of outright citing wiki. Wiki is a good basis of where to start your research. You can't just outright deny a source like wiki because of a few wrongs. It's not like it's Conservapedia or Metapedia of Whale.To. It's generally accurate. I find wiki to be extremely reliable and useful. I would never cite it; that would just be laziness on my part.
15742 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M
Offline
Posted 12/11/15 , edited 12/12/15

KarenAraragi wrote:

Don't make me bring your own bible. Do I need to remind you, that your own god ask one his believer to kill his own son. Don't be a Hippocratic with me.


That's your first mistake. Assuming I follow a god or gods.
Posted 12/11/15 , edited 12/12/15

descloud wrote:

That's your first mistake. Assuming I follow a god or gods.


Then you are being ignorant then. The devil you speak of, is no the same devil here.
10831 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
13 / F / California
Offline
Posted 12/11/15

GrandMasterTime wrote:
Yep I'm just saying that you can't outright deny something linked from Wikipedia merely because it came from there. Just check the sources from where the information is being expressed from and check there; not hard.


Unless you get some dillhole mod/admin that keeps changing shit around.
Posted 12/11/15

stars201 wrote:

I just read the title... And I'm going to answer the title.

No I didn't read it.

Edit: when i replied to this post, there was only 4 replies...i leave for a few minutes, 37 replies :o


People were reading.
Posted 12/11/15 , edited 12/11/15

VZ68 wrote:


GrandMasterTime wrote:
Yep I'm just saying that you can't outright deny something linked from Wikipedia merely because it came from there. Just check the sources from where the information is being expressed from and check there; not hard.


Unless you get some dillhole mod/admin that keeps changing shit around.


They do have it. Don't you remember the whole fiasco where somebody from congress try to change shit around but mods or somebody was like nope.
13618 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / Australia
Offline
Posted 12/11/15
Did I just read someone try to use the "sacrifice" of Isaiah as an example of real human sacrifice in the bible? Hats of to them for not reading the part where it was stopped by the same person who initiated it.
10831 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
13 / F / California
Offline
Posted 12/11/15

KarenAraragi wrote:


VZ68 wrote:


GrandMasterTime wrote:
Yep I'm just saying that you can't outright deny something linked from Wikipedia merely because it came from there. Just check the sources from where the information is being expressed from and check there; not hard.


Unless you get some dillhole mod/admin that keeps changing shit around.


They do have it. Don't you remember the whole fiasco where somebody from congress try to change shit around but mods or somebody was like nope.


Yes, but when the mod is the problem, that's the problem.
15742 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M
Offline
Posted 12/11/15 , edited 12/12/15

KarenAraragi wrote:

Then you are being ignorant then. The devil you speak of, is no the same devil here.


That's ironic. You just attacked the Christian bible because you assumed I followed it's beliefs yet you call me ignorant. But it's whatever you choose to believe.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.