First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
Post Reply Woman who LAUGHED as she filmed sex assault jailed – for LONGER than attacker
11622 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
40 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 1/19/16 , edited 1/19/16
Least she got jail time. Seen a woman gang banged before and not of them went to jail for it. Though one of them did end up in the gutter at a later time.

Sentencing these days is so sporadic sometimes.
5019 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M
Offline
Posted 1/19/16 , edited 1/19/16

PeripheralVisionary wrote:

I'm just letting you know my feelings. :(


Your feelings? you're telling me I need to be blacklisted because you're being "triggered" and that I'm treating this forum as a blog, which I am not. I've read the rules of the forum, none of which say I can't post news articles.
Posted 1/19/16 , edited 1/19/16

D4nc3Style wrote:

Your feelings? you're telling me I need to be blacklisted because you're being "triggered" and that I'm treating this forum as a blog, which I am not. I've read the rules of the forum, none of which say I can't post news articles.

You're making it sound like I don't have the right to personally blacklist you, which is certainly not equivalent to a ban in my opinion. If I annoyed you, what position am I in to say "Hey, you can't blacklist me! I'm fucking PV!" But I feel this is exactly what you just said. I believe I reserve the right to blacklist people for any reason. Now can you call my reason stupid or ill justified? You sure can, and you can tell me I don't have the right to blacklist you, but that doesn't mean I don't have it anymore.

It's just how I feel. I'm not trying to get you in trouble. I'm clearly explaining my views and feelings to you and seeing if there's a change. That is all.
5019 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M
Offline
Posted 1/19/16 , edited 1/19/16

PeripheralVisionary wrote:


You're making it sound like I don't have the right to personally blacklist you, which is certainly not equivalent to a ban in my opinion. If I annoyed you, what position am I in to say "Hey, you can't blacklist me! I'm fucking PV!" But I feel this is exactly what you just said. I believe I reserve the right to blacklist people for any reason. Now can you call my reason stupid or ill justified? You sure can, and you can tell me I don't have the right to blacklist you, but that doesn't mean I don't have it anymore.

It's just how I feel. I'm not trying to get you in trouble. I'm clearly explaining my views and feelings to you and seeing if there's a change. That is all.


That was my bad, I thought you were gonna report me for something that isn't against the rules.
27155 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 1/19/16
police/judge clearly has more hate for heartless people than attackers
Posted 1/19/16

D4nc3Style wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Can we stop posting things that just gets us angry? Why not happy stuff OP?



SportingNightRaid wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Can we stop posting things that just gets us angry? Why not happy stuff OP?


I know right.
We need more good news and less bad news on these forums.


When I come across good news I'll post it.



I like your threads on news stories though
Good or Bad


Posted 1/19/16

ISeaDreamer wrote:

This just makes me never want to go out.


-She squints her eyes, as she nods- Agreed..!
15947 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / Cold and High
Offline
Posted 1/20/16 , edited 1/20/16

"It is shocking another woman would find such an incident amusing and take the time to record it on a mobile phone," Det Con White said.
Funny how they can't think of how some women are... and some of their fetishes, but sometimes it could be because of something bad before in the past ;(

Tinamarie101 wrote:
police/judge clearly has more hate for heartless people than attackers
Don't think thats the case at all.

Morbidhanson wrote:
I understand her behavior was pretty bad, but it's worse than the assault itself?
Based on what I can see here, that makes no sense. This is not punishment proportional to the crime. She either needs less time or the person carrying out the assault needs more time.

she encouraged Victor
The victim blacked out after taking mixing booze and powerful medication – which Newton was aware of.
for Newton, told how she was drunk and made a "gross misjudgement".
So I think both of them saw it as fine, while she most likely told him it would be fine if he did so and that she liked it (rather she watching it happend liked it)...
So cind of a "joke", "its good for you" and so on.
But yes we don't really have much more on what happend and if she MADE him do it then she is more guilty of knowing that he would do it as he did after what she made him do. (sorry think I confused some of the sentences here)...

dotsforlife wrote: Least she got jail time. Seen a woman gang banged before and not of them went to jail for it. Though one of them did end up in the gutter at a later time.
Seen.. why? and you mean there was a women like that there?


redokami wrote: the street behind my house a woman got raped ontop of a car by 3 men, people could hear her screaming
what did they just do that to a random person and how "far" did they go?
like to really extreme or more the bang type?

macht_gut wrote: As a woman reading this, I am happy the woman who recorded and encourage the assault was sentence longer. She also will be a register sex offender for ten years. Maybe the next female who thinks it is okay to witnesss,, encourage, and participate will think twice.
as in participate what you mean by that or did she actually go with her as well? (I guess if she was quite "stirred"/aroused XP then I guess she would do it)
First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.