First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
Post Reply Should people who create sexual fan art of underage anime characters be punished?
29504 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Bundaberg, Queens...
Online
Posted 12/28/16
No it's a cartoon there is no problem it hurts no one.

Most people that are into Lolicon hentai aren't even pedophiles as some may suggest
31101 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / United States
Offline
Posted 12/28/16

Ryulightorb wrote:

No it's a cartoon there is no problem it hurts no one.

Most people that are into Lolicon hentai aren't even pedophiles as some may suggest






Sorry, but nowhere does it mention that they have to be real people. The intention is still there, the prepubescent nature is loud and clear. They're pedophiles, whether you want to accept that fact or not.
14247 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 12/28/16
lol no

it is normal for people to be maximally interested in 16~18+ year olds and still have interest (albeit gradually lessening along with the age) in those that are younger, with the cut-off being 7 at bare minimum. these regular people will choose older women in practice as a result though fantasy is different

real pedos are the other way around. they like the really young ones most and can't hold an interest in older people


there's a metric ton of loli art out there so you can't tell me theres a dangerous pedo behind each one.
14247 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 12/28/16

Lemontitties wrote:


Ryulightorb wrote:

No it's a cartoon there is no problem it hurts no one.

Most people that are into Lolicon hentai aren't even pedophiles as some may suggest






Sorry, but nowhere does it mention that they have to be real people. The intention is still there, the prepubescent nature is loud and clear. They're pedophiles, whether you want to accept that fact or not.


https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/27/Appeal_to_Definition

i sure don't think they have considered fictional characters like lolis when they wrote that. not to mention how lacking of detail that definition is, meaning that the interpretations can be vast
31101 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / United States
Offline
Posted 12/28/16

RedExodus wrote:

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/27/Appeal_to_Definition

i sure don't think they have considered fictional characters like lolis when they wrote that. not to mention how lacking of detail that definition is, meaning that the interpretations can be vast


They're sexually attracted to children. End of discussion, there's no other way to interpret it.
14247 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 12/28/16

Lemontitties wrote:


RedExodus wrote:

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/27/Appeal_to_Definition

i sure don't think they have considered fictional characters like lolis when they wrote that. not to mention how lacking of detail that definition is, meaning that the interpretations can be vast


They're sexually attracted to children. End of discussion, there's no other way to interpret it.


"it is normal for people to be maximally interested in 16~18+ year olds and still have interest (albeit gradually lessening along with the age) in those that are younger, with the cut-off being 7 at bare minimum. these regular people will choose older women in practice as a result though fantasy is different"


following your definition, you are walking among people who are pedophiles

u need a sense of scale
29504 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Bundaberg, Queens...
Online
Posted 12/28/16

Lemontitties wrote:


Ryulightorb wrote:

No it's a cartoon there is no problem it hurts no one.

Most people that are into Lolicon hentai aren't even pedophiles as some may suggest






Sorry, but nowhere does it mention that they have to be real people. The intention is still there, the prepubescent nature is loud and clear. They're pedophiles, whether you want to accept that fact or not.




A pedophile is someone who is attracted to real people.
You can have your opinion on the definition since its vauge but those people have no sexual interest in real children
I like Loli hentai so I guess in your belief I'm a pedophile? Disgusting the whole premise of being attracted
To a child is abhorrent and filthy.

There is nothing wrong with that form of hentai plus if you want to put people on a watch list for drawing porn put pokemon hentai drawers on a watch list for beastiality and lets not get into niches like under 6 hentai some people creepily draw and read.

I have no problem with any of them as they are drawings and most of those people don't have real sexual interests of the real life counterpart
Posted 12/28/16 , edited 12/28/16

djgamer2012 wrote:

If they are over 18 yes, I mean when I was in school, girls and even I would draw sexual pictures of anime characters I liked, they were around the same age as the anime characters so there should be nothing wrong with it. Granted it wasn't full on Hentai. I know there are some out there, but I see no problem if their around that age group.


Hahaha no. Also your example show how much a double standard you have.

No is fiction and it hurt none one. Fuck off with your unnecessary bullshit laws.
This is just has stupid has people who made that law about anal sex or lewd behavior.
31101 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / United States
Offline
Posted 12/28/16 , edited 12/28/16

Ryulightorb wrote:

A pedophile is someone who is attracted to real people.
You can have your opinion on the definition since its vauge but those people have no sexual interest in real children
I like Loli hentai so I guess in your belief I'm a pedophile? Disgusting the whole premise of being attracted
To a child is abhorrent and filthy.


That is your made up definition, not the official one. There is nothing vague about being sexually attracted to children. Yes, you are. Now I'm a little concerned to be quite frank w/ you. You are sexually attracted to the prepubescent nature, how do you think that is normal?


There is nothing wrong with that form of hentai plus if you want to put people on a watch list for drawing porn put pokemon hentai drawers on a watch list for beastiality and lets not get into niches like under 6 hentai some people creepily draw and read.


I don't think people who drawn porn in general should be put on watch. We're clearly talking about kid porn. They should be put on watch. What's wrong w/ that? This is their way of getting off w/o getting caught. A fantasy can only hold someone's attention for so long before they get tired of it and want to experience the real thing. Some handle it better than others, and vice versa.


I have no problem with any of them as they are drawings and most of those people don't have real sexual interests of the real life counterpart


And who are most of those people? Where are these facts you're bringing up? I think it's common sense to think that if someone is sexually attracted to the prepubescent nature of children, fictional or not, there's something wrong upstairs.
29504 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Bundaberg, Queens...
Online
Posted 12/28/16 , edited 12/28/16

Lemontitties wrote:


Ryulightorb wrote:

A pedophile is someone who is attracted to real people.
You can have your opinion on the definition since its vauge but those people have no sexual interest in real children
I like Loli hentai so I guess in your belief I'm a pedophile? Disgusting the whole premise of being attracted
To a child is abhorrent and filthy.


That is your made up definition, not the official one. Yes, you are. Now I'm a little concerned to be quite frank w/ you. You are sexually attracted to the prepubescent nature, how do you think that is normal?


There is nothing wrong with that form of hentai plus if you want to put people on a watch list for drawing porn put pokemon hentai drawers on a watch list for beastiality and lets not get into niches like under 6 hentai some people creepily draw and read.


I don't think people who drawn porn in general should be put on watch. We're clearly talking about kid porn. They should be put on watch. What's wrong w/ that? This is their way of getting off w/o getting caught. A fantasy can only hold someone's attention for so long before they get tired of it and want to experience the real thing. Some handle it better than others, and vice versa.


I have no problem with any of them as they are drawings and most of those people don't have real sexual interests of the real life counterpart


And who are most of those people? Where are these facts you're bringing up? I think it's common sense to think that if someone is sexually attracted to the prepubescent nature of children, fictional or not, there's something wrong upstairs.


1. no you are being nitpicky the official definition is vauge but meant to mean real people
I'm attracted to the taboo side and i'm attracted to short and petite girls in general which mixes with lolicon easily.
I have seen multiple psychologists in my lifetime and they knew about my porn habits and saw it as fine and none of them said i was a pedophile actually they explicitely stated that i'm not.


2. Nobody should be put on a watch for something innocent that doesn't hurt anyone that's fucked up beyond belief and why i use a vpn because some scumbag out there wants to put people on watch lists for their porn habits.

3. Most of my friends look at this kind of stuff and none of them are attracted to actual prebuescent children we have talked about that kind of shit before about how many people misunderstand because they are close minded.
There is nothing wrong with them and they are fully functional people who deserve just as much respect as you do and should be allowed their privacy

Posted 12/28/16
By that logic people should be put in jail for Sadomasochism.
Especially sadist.
13093 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
☆Land of sweets☆
Offline
Posted 12/28/16
reminder that UN, which vehemently criticized Japan for allowing doujin work involving underage fictional characters had quite a few of their employees investigated for being involved in real life sexual harassment with non-fictional children (some of them had that stuff in their computers). makes you wonder about UN's high moral ground against Japan and doujin.
53387 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 12/28/16
No. It's a freaking drawing!!

Sure. It's creepy but that doesn't mean it'll happen in real life! I used to draw gore/violent anime stuff (like a head detached from body and blood everywhere) when I'm bored but that doesn't mean I'd do it in real life wtf and this is coming from someone who has a fear of blood.

In my opinion, it's just similar to loli. People who draw those doesn't mean they have actual sexual interest on kids!
3108 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M / Brooklyn, NY
Offline
Posted 12/28/16
ask people if they should punish people who make child porn.
29504 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Bundaberg, Queens...
Online
Posted 12/28/16

luffyisify wrote:

ask people if they should punish people who make child porn.


big difference between underage art/lolicon hentai and child porn.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.