First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
Post Reply There's No Such Thing as a Straight Woman
27147 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 3/18/16
okay then o.o
Posted 3/19/16
27257 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
39 / Inside your compu...
Offline
Posted 3/19/16 , edited 3/19/16
17179 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
(´◔౪◔)✂❤
Offline
Posted 3/19/16
Well there have been straight women that have slept with other women....same for guys
28192 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 3/19/16

Daisuki-Suki wrote:

http://www.pride.com/outrageous/2015/11/05/study-says-theres-no-such-thing-straight-woman

Explain. I have never considered that I was bisexual or a lesbian at all. I always thought I was straight? But science says I'm lesbian. What do I with my life now? (I'm a proud Christian)

Leviticus 18:22, "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."


Researcher sounds like a dipshit.

And if you're actually going to live your life according to Leviticus you have a hell of a lot more problems to deal with then questioning your sexuality. Like where to find a steady supply of animal sacrifices and the sudden knowledge that your nieces and nephews are considered viable marriage candidates.
5974 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M / Terra Australis (...
Offline
Posted 3/19/16
The page's title is click bait and also wrong, because the report mentioned actually states that 82% of the women in the study were aroused by both men and women, according to the page itself.

Now the first problem. Is sample size. The number....345 women. Fucking hell.

This is an absurd number of people to use for this study. How the actual fuck does anyone accept this for judging the sexuality of ONE HALF OF THE ENTIRE FUCKAN HUMAN SPECIES. No. This is idiotic. Look, I understand these surveys are limited, but this would never be acceptable as a representative sample of female sexuality.

"measured the arousal of women using eye tracking devices and direct measures of physiological sexual response."

From what is also said by others who apparently sight this report, eye tracking devices are also used. I am VERY SKEPTIKALLLLL!!!!! About that. People tend to have different reactions to sexual responses in general, and eye movement would change depending on such. I doubt this is really a reliable method of testing attraction.



Oh, I just realised something very very bad.

See, the links on the page..

DON'T LEAD TO A FUCKING REPORT. And on that Page, I looked around, and there was also NO LINK TO THE FUCKING REPORT WHEN I CHECKED THIS FUCKING PAGE.

Great, now I have to go and find it. Except, there are 3-8 different papers that could be the one, and I have to download ALL of these fucking things.

KIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLL MMMMMMMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEE NNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWW PPPPPPPPPVVVVVVVV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Oh guess what, I have to PAY TO GAIN ACCESS TO HIS FINDINGS. Fuckan hellllllllllllllllllll

Okay.....I can't access them people. I am sorry.

But, given the sample size already, I doubt the credibility immensely.
48409 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / AZ
Offline
Posted 3/19/16

Rujikin wrote:

Most of them are straight very few are hunchbacks.


181 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
15 / M / United Kingdom
Offline
Posted 3/19/16

TheUltimateTeaGod wrote:

Live your life, the way you want to!


Basically the best way you can live really!

Why do you think I still use this sight?
17179 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
(´◔౪◔)✂❤
Offline
Posted 3/19/16

HuastecoOtaku wrote:


Rujikin wrote:

Most of them are straight very few are hunchbacks.


five bucks the poster is a hunchback himself with a hairy asshole.
33345 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / Socal
Offline
Posted 3/19/16
lol you're gonna let a simple biased article dictate your sexual orientation?

anyway too biased imo
19493 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F / United States, DE
Offline
Posted 3/19/16
Lmao what kind of science is that.

I mean I'm bi, but still.
14733 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 3/19/16 , edited 3/19/16

runec wrote:And if you're actually going to live your life according to Leviticus you have a hell of a lot more problems to deal with then questioning your sexuality. Like where to find a steady supply of animal sacrifices and the sudden knowledge that your nieces and nephews are considered viable marriage candidates.


But what will I do if someone steals my oxen?


pandrasb wrote:

lol you're gonna let a simple biased article dictate your sexual orientation?

anyway too biased imo


Gay commentaries on society are like the old saying about "The drunk always wants everyone else in the room to have a drink." (Ie., so he won't sit in the corner being the only one with a problem.)

They're never the only ones, it's always the rest of society and secret historical figures and celebrities who were covering up!
17320 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / F / Croatia
Offline
Posted 3/19/16 , edited 3/19/16

E_Sweezy wrote:

those scientists are sinners who watch too much porn to know the definition of a proper and pure relationship in the eyes of God.


Exactly. And masturbation is a sin because you're killing potential offspring!
121 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M
Offline
Posted 3/19/16
Sexuality isn't easy. Chances are pretty good most of us, regardless of what we think, experience wants and desires on a subconscious level that we're not even aware of but could possibly show up in a brain scan? *shrug*
Humms 
10529 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / CAN, ON
Offline
Posted 3/19/16
Yeah, that's probably true. Most just prefer the D over the V.

Just like how women can go from a man to a woman instantly, because they feel comfortable with any gender in terms of a relationship. I see it all the time. Women are funny sometimes but a hell of a show.

It's not so much what turns them on, it's basically how they get turned on. Women are complicated that way. Men are simple. So the idea of no straight women is actually quite possible.
First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.