First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
Autocracy
299 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Samsara
Offline
Posted 2/13/08

HayatellAyasaki wrote:

^ It is naive to think the would wouldn't devolve without a proper order. If we should have taken the path of Anarchy, we don't certainly know what would it be. Your assumptions are merely that. On the other hand, we live in another time where society is a fundamental part of the entire planet -nation-wise.-

Imagine how much more those percentages would raise, if we lived in an Anarchy-based world. You think everything would work just fine? Probably? That 1% is just an estimate, people won't live happily without problems, because we are all humans, humans are greed. Anarchy wouldn't last more than a month.


The age old concept that civilizations cannot advance and would devolve without government is a myth.I do not assume anything,I state fact.

Perfect examples of Anarchy would be Spain during the the Spanish Civil War. The economy was run in a socialist manner.In the Anarchists communes they produced more than what was originally produced before the collectivization.The events and condition that Spain was in was best described by the famous writer George Orwell whom had come to Spain to support the movement, in his book Homage to Catalonia he describes:

I had dropped more or less by chance into the only community of any size in Western Europe where political consciousness and disbelief in capitalism were more normal than their opposites. Up here in Aragon one was among tens of thousands of people, mainly though not entirely of working-class origin, all living at the same level and mingling on terms of equality. In theory it was perfect equality, and even in practice it was not far from it. There is a sense in which it would be true to say that one was experiencing a foretaste of Socialism, by which I mean that the prevailing mental atmosphere was that of Socialism. Many of the normal motives of civilized life – snobbishness, money-grubbing, fear of the boss, etc. – had simply ceased to exist. The ordinary class-division of society had disappeared to an extent that is almost unthinkable in the money-tainted air of England; there was no one there except the peasants and ourselves, and no one owned anyone else as his master.

The other example would be Somalia.The country after the fall of the central government and before the ICU took over, was in complete chaos, but during that time living standards increased in absolute terms, relative to the government era, and relative to other African nations at that time.The World Bank conducted an economic survey and found that the distribution of wealth was more equal, and the extent of extreme poverty lesser than in governed West African nations.

Anarchy wouldn't last a more than a month huh?Well these two regions were in a state of Anarchy for years and it managed to improve the lives of the people living there.
9584 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / In Memphis, with...
Offline
Posted 2/13/08
^ Ah, but that would be the case if all nations were equal, which is totally mistaken. First, second, third-world nations. There is no point in comparing nations of different realities. It wouldn't last a month, no it wouldn't last a week. It looks like you are still misunderstand it, Anarchy will not work in modern times. It's in vain to give examples when we are living in a totally different time period.
619 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / F / Australia.
Offline
Posted 2/13/08
We don't need another dictator, the world already has enough
problems with anarchy and the taliban..
962 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
40 / M / dgs
Offline
Posted 2/13/08
a perfect society will be utopia instead of dictatorship or anarchy.

anarchy is always a state of unrest.

anarchy do lasts but the country will not progress economically, socially or technologically.

13326 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Terra
Offline
Posted 2/13/08

dkcy209 wrote:

a perfect society will be utopia instead of dictatorship or anarchy.

anarchy is always a state of unrest.

anarchy do lasts but the country will not progress economically, socially or technologically.



i would creat a utopia if i have the death note... :O... and nah... anarchy is good... tho i like dictatorship better
2142 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / America, Fuck Yeah.
Offline
Posted 2/13/08
things are good as they are now.

period.
1236 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Whispering Rock P...
Offline
Posted 2/13/08

Nayru wrote:

things are good as they are now.

period.


How can u say dat?!!11 What about the corrupchin and conspiracy!! ANARCHYRISEAGAINSTSERGTANKIAN RAGEAGAINSTTHEMACHINE FTW!!
2142 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / America, Fuck Yeah.
Offline
Posted 2/13/08
LOL

lol wut ur right.

I forgot how rise agaisnt and rage agaisnt the machine make money.

COMPLAINING into a microphone
1236 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Whispering Rock P...
Offline
Posted 2/13/08

Nayru wrote:

LOL

lol wut ur right.

I forgot how rise agaisnt and rage agaisnt the machine make money.

COMPLAINING into a microphone


They aren't complaiiiiiiiiiining!!!!!
They enlighten us with there KNOWLEDGE OF CONSPIRACY!!
2142 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / America, Fuck Yeah.
Offline
Posted 2/13/08
AAHHHHH

lol wut?
299 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Samsara
Offline
Posted 2/13/08

HayatellAyasaki wrote:

^ Ah, but that would be the case if all nations were equal, which is totally mistaken. First, second, third-world nations. There is no point in comparing nations of different realities. It wouldn't last a month, no it wouldn't last a week. It looks like you are still misunderstand it, Anarchy will not work in modern times. It's in vain to give examples when we are living in a totally different time period.


Stop making assumptions and start backing your word up with facts.So far you haven't proven me wrong on any of my points.

If you haven't noticed the rest of the world is not as materialistic or in pursuit of hedonistic pleasures as people who live in the US or nations whom the US have taken stewardship of such as S. Korea or Japan.
9584 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / In Memphis, with...
Offline
Posted 2/13/08
^ It's not about prove you wrong, or not. It's about reality. You want facts? You have facts: look at the first-world countries, do you think they grew up to be what they are because of Anarchy? Are you so obsessed with an impossible dream, that of course didn't have a 'beforehand plan.'

Tell me, how do you see Anarchy for the future, if Anarchy was indeed the way? Tell me how do you see it working. No, no. I am not asking whether it works, or not. I am asking how, if you were to decide, would you see Anarchy for a future?

Anarchy is so ambiguous once you place it in the image of every person. You think everybody would be wise, morally-right, smart, and competitive enough to make it work? Of course not, because we -no longer- live in a world where people can be unified. Face the facts, people don't get along. People -as I said before,- are greed.

I am not completely against Anarchy, read older posts of mine if you don't believe so, but I do realize the flaws of it. I know governments are this, and that. They don't work like they -in theory- should, but without them we would have chaos.

The fact that a certain percentage of people think positively, and differently -in a good way,- doesn't mean everybody will think the same way. There is a limit to be naive, even for those that think different.
2142 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / America, Fuck Yeah.
Offline
Posted 2/13/08
do you know why anarchy isnt the major prevailing government of any world power? because it DOESNT WORK LOL
1236 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Whispering Rock P...
Offline
Posted 2/13/08
I say three cheers for Communism and put robots in the government.
1902 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / F / most likely in bed.
Offline
Posted 2/13/08
Autocray is a bad idea in my opinion as it only works in favour of the ruler. If it's a good ruler who cares about the people and is fair, then what works in his favour might be good for the people but what if he is a bad one? What if he continuously makes bad decisions that causes his people to suffer?
Anarchy seems a good idea too but it seems fragile and would not last long in the real world.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.