First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next  Last
If women are equal to men then why have women not overthrown men?
8502 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Imoutoland!
Offline
Posted 5/2/16
I thought PrinceJudar already had command over the entire human race.
Posted 5/2/16 , edited 5/2/16
27257 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
39 / Inside your compu...
Offline
Posted 5/2/16
In the grand scheme of things, things are how they are not because people actively designed it that way but it happens to turn out that way.
Posted 5/2/16 , edited 5/2/16
Because women are not like men. The end.
Posted 5/2/16
Men have always rule the world. I don't think that will change anytime soon.
11505 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/2/16

stars201 wrote:

Men have always rule the world. I don't think that will change anytime soon.


I think aliens rule the world ^_^

<insert alien meme>
10057 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Maryland
Online
Posted 5/2/16 , edited 5/11/16
I mean, just to take a crack at this topic, I'd say that in a logical sense, equality isn't possible. I mean, it'd be an example of a form as set forth by Plato, something that is conceptually feasible but practically impossible to attain.

It's a bit like mathematics. For instance, if you have a 1, and you have a 2, your combined total is three, right? So, if the one "overthrows" the two, then you're stuck with 2 and 1, respectively, which still equal 3. Equality is theoretically great, but not possible. Even things we assume to be true, such as 2=2, aren't really accurate. It's just that we round them both to two, even though one is in some way, however small, superior to the other.

As for the actual subject matter, and applying that principle, I'd say the primary reason it hasn't happened is because society is in such a position now that it ("it" being a violent uprising) wouldn't be acceptable to either side of the issue. In that regard, you could argue that activism is a way of societal overthrowing, however effective it may be. So, long story short, I'd say times have changed such that even in less developed nations, humans have generally moved past physical violence as a way to move forward their agendas. There's a reason that those groups that haven't put down their weapons and barbarous tactics are being hunted by global task-forces; they're an existential exile, and they threaten order as it stands.

All-in-all, there are as many reasons that an overthrow hasn't happened as there are women who feel oppressed. I don't necessarily believe it correlates to inferiority in any way, shape, or form, though!
Posted 5/2/16

stars201 wrote:

Men have always rule the world. I don't think that will change anytime soon.


Women don't want to rule it. That's a man's fantasy. Plus the fact that women already rule their husbands and are mothers to their children, its a silly question. Without women all the men would kill themselves due to lack of sex, or they would die out eventually anyway since no one would be born. lol
11622 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
40 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 5/2/16

Yume_Mirai wrote:
Without women all the men would kill themselves due to lack of sex, or they would die out eventually anyway since no one would be born. lol


Sounds ideal to me.
7413 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
48 / M / New England, USA
Offline
Posted 5/2/16

WeeabooWarrior wrote:

This is the question I have today. There is no right or wrong answer, so I only ask my readers to seek the truth.

Men have oppressed men since the dawn of time. From the Slave Rebellion in Rome to the American Revolution, to the Chinese Civil War. Men have always overthrown the men that oppressed them. My question to you is this then.

If women are equal to men in every respect, which we are told, why is it then, that no majority female nations have overthrown the men who had or were in control of those nations?

( Remember, women being oppressed can't be an answer, that would conflict with the idea that men would be superior as men have overthrown men.)

What is it about women, throughout the centuries based on gender that made them non violent in trying to overthrow male dominance?



Well, the very definition of equality is "all things being equal" so "overthrowing" wouldn't be a factor. As for why females aren't usually as aggressive as males there's a simple answer to that..."testosterone". Very few women have the testosterone supply a man has (naturally, not chemically through steroids).

3515 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Indiana
Offline
Posted 5/2/16
They're too busy on pinterest
628 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Sacramento, CA
Offline
Posted 5/2/16
Why would they have to"overthrow" anybody? It's not like men rule the world in some dystopian future where women are relegated to slavery or some crap. Women and men are inherently unequal (biologically and physiologically, we're very different), but that doesn't necessarily mean one is inherently better than the other. You need both sexes to continue propagating the human race. Acting like one gender is superior to the other is stupid. At the end of the day, we're all humans.
17181 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
(´◔౪◔)✂❤
Offline
Posted 5/2/16
According to some people, they have already taken over.
22653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 5/2/16

PeripheralVisionary wrote:

I thought PrinceJudar already had command over the entire human race.


Sometimes you have to let them think they have power.

3088 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 5/2/16
Well, men have tried since the dawn of time (shh...we have to make women think they are superior :D)
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.