First  Prev  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next  Last
Is homicide wrong?
360 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 2/12/08 , edited 4/21/08
that's funny... The bible itself is filled with war and violence.
1537 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / 34.307608 ... -11...
Offline
Posted 2/12/08 , edited 4/21/08
well it helps to make people to stop masturbating


19324 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
70 / M / Motor City
Offline
Posted 2/12/08 , edited 4/21/08
Homocide lmao... uh no one has the right to take another persons life...

Well except if its for revenge. People may argue against it... but i dont...
47421 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / F / Australia.
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08
well we eat to stay alive, it's called a food chain but to kill someone else is another story....
177 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / Somewhere on Earth
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08
I think the world is governed by the fact that we can't kill anyone/anything on the same level of the food chain. Killing a lower one is permissible under circumstances.
1771 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / Malaysia
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08
Animal eat in order to survive while human survive in order to eat... hahas xD
So about homicide, i think it had nothing to do with eating to continue survive. If it's right or legal to kill somebody else, means we are living in a world which is killing or massacre happen anywhere anytime. We could have been killed because of a small matter isnt it ? Sounds like something bad to me coz i often involve myself in an arguement or a big fight among my friend... Hahas xD
4769 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
74 / M
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08
is doing god's work so wrong?
1329 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
95 / F
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08
Homocide is a grey area ethically, and a black one legally.

In a legal sense, homocide is wrong. There's not really two ways about it.

Ethically, it's very grey indeed. You need to take so many factors into consideration. Did the killer know the killed? Was the killed some kind of predator? Was the killed planning on some ethically immoral act? Does the killer have some underlying mental issues?

It's much like the Hitler scenario my first year prof told us all.

A doctor, knowing full well what Hitler is doing, and is going to continue to do, is standing next to him, and is the only one capable of saving his life. What's the right course of action?

In the end, it all depends on your perspectives and reasoning ability. If you can reason well with yourself, you can find a good reason to do pretty much anything and have it justified.
452 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / United Kingdom
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08
Of course it's wrong. You're taking away that person's future, the people he knows' friend and your own freedom. Noone has the right to kill, and noone deserves to be killed. Though I'd still kill them over the alternative of lifelong prison sentence.
3229 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08
Is homicide wrong?? How stupid
13326 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / Terra
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08

jmsberg wrote:


o0James0o wrote:

to make myself clear here, im askin y is it that human r a lot less edible...(by chance u eat 1 b4?)

and whats wrong with 14?... u cant blame me for askin questions that even u cant answer..~


That is your post yes? [sarcasm]first of all, excellent use of logic there, it doesn't sound like a desperate immature attempt at a comeback at all [/sarcasm]

I only half remember this post because it didn't answer any retorts that I offered. It just re-asks the questions that I completely and utterly answered.

"y (sic) is it that human (sic) r (sic) a lot less edible.. (by chance [sic] u[sic] eat 1 [sic] b4 [sic]?) is what you are asking again. "sic" indicates a typo btw (sic)

In my original post I said (quoting word for word) "animals typically are not cannibalistic. The taste of one's own species is not appealing to any one creature." If humans are no better than animals than humans should at least behave like an animal. This is called logic, a concept you fail a using.

As for not being a able to answer your question. My post answering your question was 13 lines long. More than enough to dis-prove whatever the hell it is you were asking.

Furthermore, I think the problem is that you are having too much trouble comprehending my posts.

Also a thing to consider: I am smart and you are dumb. Whether or not the fact that you are 14 is the issue is debatable.


i dont get a thing u just said....

if u like to correct other's grammar so much, please go be a teacher

where did u found out that the taste of one's species if not appealing to them?... (by chance u able to communicate with animals?)

You are not smart.... just because your older than me doesnt make u smarter than me... geniuses think different from normal people.
1419 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / A series of tubes
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08

o0James0o wrote:


jmsberg wrote:


o0James0o wrote:

to make myself clear here, im askin y is it that human r a lot less edible...(by chance u eat 1 b4?)

and whats wrong with 14?... u cant blame me for askin questions that even u cant answer..~


That is your post yes? [sarcasm]first of all, excellent use of logic there, it doesn't sound like a desperate immature attempt at a comeback at all [/sarcasm]

I only half remember this post because it didn't answer any retorts that I offered. It just re-asks the questions that I completely and utterly answered.

"y (sic) is it that human (sic) r (sic) a lot less edible.. (by chance [sic] u[sic] eat 1 [sic] b4 [sic]?) is what you are asking again. "sic" indicates a typo btw (sic)

In my original post I said (quoting word for word) "animals typically are not cannibalistic. The taste of one's own species is not appealing to any one creature." If humans are no better than animals than humans should at least behave like an animal. This is called logic, a concept you fail a using.

As for not being a able to answer your question. My post answering your question was 13 lines long. More than enough to dis-prove whatever the hell it is you were asking.

Furthermore, I think the problem is that you are having too much trouble comprehending my posts.

Also a thing to consider: I am smart and you are dumb. Whether or not the fact that you are 14 is the issue is debatable.


i dont get a thing u just said.... (exactly)

if u (sic) like to correct other's grammar so much, please go be a teacher

where did u (sic) found out that the taste of one's species if not appealing to them?... (by chance u (sic) able to communicate with animals?)

You are not smart.... just because your older than me doesnt (sic) make u smarter than me... geniuses think different from normal people. (< genius lol :lol:)


[/sucesstroll]
13326 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / Terra
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08

jmsberg wrote:


xxgivingupxx wrote:what are ya supposed to eat if you dont kill plants or animals?

o0James0o wrote:
i would rather not eat life... and btw... i drink water.... when i get hungry.... it gets you full


Holy fucking shit! I just realized this whole thread has been one big troll! Surviving solely on water is in-fucking-possible! That's just for starters. His mom would clearly force him to eat solid food on a regular basis, so it is impossible for him to have that kind of diet.

He's lying! I've had my suspicions at first, but this is a epic fucking troll! Its do unbelievable to be anything else.
If it looks like a troll, acts like a troll, and smells like a troll, well... you know.


A famous phrase from Marie Antoinette "Let Them Eat Cake!~"
i suppose cake(the cake from the phrase if u know what the cake means) will get people full(especially people like yourself)
1419 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / A series of tubes
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08

o0James0o wrote:

A famous phrase from Marie Antoinette "Let Them Eat Cake!~"
i suppose cake(the cake from the phrase if u know what the cake means) will get people full(especially people like yourself)


lol wut
4216 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / F / Brooklyn, NY
Offline
Posted 2/13/08 , edited 4/21/08
Depends on the person and the reason. Because you want something they have? No. Because they offended you or did something (generally unharmful) bad towards you? No. For no real reason at all?... yah- no.

But you threaten me or my family or inflict harm on me or my family in a bodily way.. Then I will ripe your brains out through your ass. So, no, in a general sense, I don't think killing your own is acceptable. But I think there are circumstances where killing another person is acceptable...


First  Prev  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.