First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
Why do you think people today have become so sensitive?
33510 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / U.S.A.
Offline
Posted 5/9/16

animegirl2222 wrote:

the lot of kids are raised with spoons in their mouths and never told 'no', thus they grow up to become little brats who expect to be treated specially.

Some people just let the mobile phones do all the parenting.

















Doesn't work.
25139 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Beyond The Wall
Offline
Posted 5/9/16
42391 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / F / New Jersey, USA
Offline
Posted 5/9/16
Please let this coddling end. Humans are so weak.
411 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
15 / F / Idaho
Offline
Posted 5/9/16
This is a guess: b/c we've grown extremely self conscious
1408 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / The Cosmos
Offline
Posted 5/9/16
I think it's the air. You know, pollution and ish.






Plus if you had an issue with someone back in the day you'd just duel over it at high noon. Now all you can do is write them an angry letter and hope they reconsider their actions
9285 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Australia
Offline
Posted 5/9/16 , edited 5/9/16

D4nc3Style wrote:


MrAnimeSK wrote:

Seems to be how kids are being rasied now and it seems to be being drilled into us that we are all victims and that everything is offensive and that offending someone is the worst thing in the world even if what you're saying is true or the opinion that you are entitled to.
I blame the left wing do gooders, the SJW's, the femnazis, the political correctness, white guilt, females having a s say in politics (lol), etc
We are being taught that everything is offensive. Even being proud of who we are and our way of life (well, if you are white that is).
I blame the education system and the media. Victim mentality is at an all time high.



There's such a thing? lol


(sarcasm i assume?) my god their nubers are increasing seemingly daily.


underlock wrote:


MrAnimeSK wrote:

Seems to be how kids are being rasied now and it seems to be being drilled into us that we are all victims and that everything is offensive and that offending someone is the worst thing in the world even if what you're saying is true or the opinion that you are entitled to.
I blame the left wing do gooders, the SJW's, the femnazis, the political correctness, white guilt, females having a s say in politics (lol), etc
We are being taught that everything is offensive. Even being proud of who we are and our way of life (well, if you are white that is).
I blame the education system and the media. Victim mentality is at an all time high.



I lost you after rasied.

Real talk? (grammar nazi?)
500 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Port St. Lucie Fl...
Offline
Posted 5/9/16
liberal media such as facebook and tumblr are big factors. since they are so wildly popular the majority of people are getting biased info. fb is even blocking anything conservative or just anything they dont agree with. i think people need to get off social media more and experience things themselves
157 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / West Coast USA
Offline
Posted 5/10/16
I used to be. But now I'm a little more used to the way people actually are.
22653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 5/10/16
Has a lot to do with a lack of war, a combination economic prosperity + individualism, and of course Gynocentrism.

Posted 5/10/16

PrinceJudar wrote:

Has a lot to do with a lack of war, a combination economic prosperity + individualism, and of course Gynocentrism.



There is the war on terror still ongoing with ISIL, so its not really a lack of war. And I'm sure women aren't any more narcissistic than men are.

I think its the internet, people don't go out enough anymore or are social as much offline.
22653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 5/10/16

Yume_Mirai wrote:

There is the war on terror still ongoing with ISIL, so its not really a lack of war. And I'm sure women aren't any more narcissistic than men are.

I think its the internet, people don't go out enough anymore or are social as much offline.


Our society isn't in 'war-like' state as it was during WWII.

I didn't say anything about women being more narcissistic. I'm not sure where you read that in my comment.


Posted 5/10/16 , edited 5/10/16

PrinceJudar wrote:


Yume_Mirai wrote:

There is the war on terror still ongoing with ISIL, so its not really a lack of war. And I'm sure women aren't any more narcissistic than men are.

I think its the internet, people don't go out enough anymore or are social as much offline.


Our society isn't in 'war-like' state as it was during WWII.

I didn't say anything about women being more narcissistic. I'm not sure where you read that in my comment.




"gynocentrism" or "androcentrism" if it even exists would be your claim of feminine narcissism. there's plenty of it from both genders, and I don't mean feminism, which I don't approve of and is a lost cause imo. whenever I hear of gynocentrism I think of mgtow and antifeminists, which is more of the same hate as feminism has. Fuck the labels, just don't be a sexist bitch or asshole.


No not since vietnam actually, and I recognize islamist fundamentalists as a viable threat nonetheless. unless you wish for us to have to wear a burka to the supermarket.

WWII was an epic war, and lets hope we don't have another one of that magnitude. But there has been plenty of wars since then. bad enough not to dismiss.
22653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 5/10/16 , edited 5/10/16

Yume_Mirai wrote:

"gynocentrism" or "androcentrism") if it even exists would be your claim of feminine narcissism. there's plenty of it from both genders, and I don't mean feminism, which I don't approve of and is a lost cause imo. whenever I hear of gynocentrism I think of mgtow and antifeminists, which is more of the same hate as feminism has.


No not since vietnam, and I recognize islamist fundamentalists as a viable threat nonetheless. unless you wish for us to have to weak a burka to the supermarket.


That's...not what Gynocentrism means at all.

Gynocentrism is an evolutionary explanation involving human mating strategies, particularly the dominance of female preference. Women have more costs involved in reproduction and so it had been pressured on women more than men to select a suitable mate. Making a mistake in selection would cost a female a lot more than would a male. Women are less likely to settle than men. Gynocentrism encompasses the concept of dominant female preference and the tendency to cater to it. None of this is by proximate means or on a conscious level. It is simply a likely explanation as to why empathy is favored as it is today--as it is preferred by females.

I'm not saying they're not a threat, it just isn't the same state.





Posted 5/10/16 , edited 5/10/16

PrinceJudar wrote:


Yume_Mirai wrote:

"gynocentrism" or "androcentrism") if it even exists would be your claim of feminine narcissism. there's plenty of it from both genders, and I don't mean feminism, which I don't approve of and is a lost cause imo. whenever I hear of gynocentrism I think of mgtow and antifeminists, which is more of the same hate as feminism has.


No not since vietnam, and I recognize islamist fundamentalists as a viable threat nonetheless. unless you wish for us to have to weak a burka to the supermarket.


That's...not what Gynocentrism means at all.

Gynocentrism is an evolutionary explanation involving human mating strategies, particularly the dominance of female preference. Women have more costs involved in reproduction and so it had been pressured on women more than men to select a suitable mate. Making a mistake in selection would cost a female a lot more than would a male. Women are less likely to settle than men. Gynocentrism encompasses the concept of dominant female preference. None of this is by proximate means or on a conscious level. It is simply a likely explanation as to why empathy is favored as it is today--as it is preferred by females.

I'm not saying they're not a threat, it just isn't the same state.







Yeah well but that's just animal nature, not just in humans. Males are the suitors, and compete/fight for the female. Denying thIs is like swimming against the tide, of genetics, and nature's design, or instinct. Although I don't see how it applies to homosexual lifestyles.

Having said this, human beings aren't solely driven by instinct due to their greater intellect, so its understandable that ppl are becoming aware of imbalances of power between the sexes.
22653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 5/10/16 , edited 5/10/16

Yume_Mirai wrote:

Yeah well but that's just animal nature, not just in humans. Males are the suitors, and compete/fight for the female. Denying thIs is like swimming against the tide, of genetics, and nature's design, or instinct. Although I don't see how it applies to homosexual lifestyles.

Having said this, human beings aren't solely drivin by instinct due to their greater intellect, so its understandable that ppl are becoming aware of imbalances of power between the sexes.


Nurture can be more permanent than nature. Never said humans are driven by instinct alone as I am no Behaviorist. However, evolutionary history is indisputably influential. Humans are not immune to the influence of biology and nature because of intellect. One cannot separate intelligence from evolution, how could it be? Nature provides guidelines to visible proximate mechanisms in place today. It is not a rule. Homosexuality cannot be said to be unnatural anymore than it can be said to invalidate the observable trend.


First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.