First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next  Last
I don't mean to offend....
Posted 5/31/16

HolyDrumstick wrote:


MysticGon wrote:

My butt isn't hurt enough... Soon people will be calling themselves human-American out of respect for their animal counterparts.


Funny.....and sadly probably true.

I feel like if we keep heading in this direction.... someone's going to get in trouble for bestiality because they sleep with someone who identifies as an animal.

We'll eventually live in a world where you can't convict sociopaths, because that's discrimination. Pedophiles looking at naked children will be okay....because I mean, how exactly does that hurt the children?

And so on.


Posted 6/1/16

This guy...
runec 
29494 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Online
Posted 6/1/16 , edited 6/1/16

couvier wrote:
this. = v=
and did he really call LGBT a mental disorder!? o-o


You should hop over to the transgender bathroom thread. Its no fun if you just start at the bottom of the rabbit hole. ;p
17711 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / B.C, Canada
Offline
Posted 6/1/16
Fuck I am of the philosophy if bullets can't solve the problem it isn't worth fussing over. Furthermore I am of the opinion Paedophilia, terrorism, and other dangerous things can be solved by bullets, as can tyranny.
11386 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Imoutoland!
Online
Posted 6/1/16 , edited 6/1/16
Why I don't agree with your opinion, I think you're right that civility is needed, but as long as you can reason why you think someone is, say, a bigot, a dick, or most other types of insults, I think that's a rational discussion to an extent.


My opinion on this thread? I find it ironic at how offended "anti sjws" get when they have their opinions challenged on the internet.
13872 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / Australia
Offline
Posted 6/1/16 , edited 6/1/16

runec wrote:

Protip: You don't refer to LGBT as "lifestyle". -.-


(っ◔◡◔)っ Relax mate, lifestyle doesn't imply choice.
17711 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / B.C, Canada
Offline
Posted 6/1/16

PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Why I don't agree with your opinion, I think you're right that civility is needed, but as long as you can reason why you think someone is, say, a bigot, a dick, or most other types of insults, I think that's a rational discussion to an extent.


My opinion on this thread? I find it ironic at how offended "anti sjws" get when they have their opinions challenged on the internet.


You can never draw that hard line in the sand can you mate. I hope to god you never gain command over a military unit.
11386 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Imoutoland!
Online
Posted 6/1/16

Ranwolf wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Why I don't agree with your opinion, I think you're right that civility is needed, but as long as you can reason why you think someone is, say, a bigot, a dick, or most other types of insults, I think that's a rational discussion to an extent.


My opinion on this thread? I find it ironic at how offended "anti sjws" get when they have their opinions challenged on the internet.


You can never draw that hard line in the sand can you mate. I hope to god you never gain command over a military unit.


What do you mean?
30446 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
It doesn't matter.
Offline
Posted 6/1/16 , edited 6/1/16
OP's logic: The offence is as irrelevant because the audience is alive.
17711 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / B.C, Canada
Offline
Posted 6/1/16

PeripheralVisionary wrote:


Ranwolf wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Why I don't agree with your opinion, I think you're right that civility is needed, but as long as you can reason why you think someone is, say, a bigot, a dick, or most other types of insults, I think that's a rational discussion to an extent.


My opinion on this thread? I find it ironic at how offended "anti sjws" get when they have their opinions challenged on the internet.


You can never draw that hard line in the sand can you mate. I hope to god you never gain command over a military unit.


What do you mean?


I mean you always choose the middle of the road option, that you seek to offend as small a number of people as possible. I say your back bone is lacking and you are unworthy of anything since you seek not to offend. Those who will not fight for a cause are unworthy of anything.
30446 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
It doesn't matter.
Offline
Posted 6/1/16

Ranwolf wrote:

I mean you always choose the middle of the road option, that you seek to offend as small a number of people as possible. I say your back bone is lacking and you are unworthy of anything since you seek not to offend. Those who will not fight for a cause are unworthy of anything.


Does boot camp involve being kicked in the head? Because that's how you sound today.
11386 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Imoutoland!
Online
Posted 6/1/16 , edited 6/1/16

Ranwolf wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:


Ranwolf wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Why I don't agree with your opinion, I think you're right that civility is needed, but as long as you can reason why you think someone is, say, a bigot, a dick, or most other types of insults, I think that's a rational discussion to an extent.


My opinion on this thread? I find it ironic at how offended "anti sjws" get when they have their opinions challenged on the internet.


You can never draw that hard line in the sand can you mate. I hope to god you never gain command over a military unit.


What do you mean?


I mean you always choose the middle of the road option, that you seek to offend as small a number of people as possible. I say your back bone is lacking and you are unworthy of anything since you seek not to offend. Those who will not fight for a cause are unworthy of anything.


They told me to cut back on calling people bigots, even when I reasoned WHY I think they're bigots, especially concerning my interactions with Holy in a thread awhile back. I thought I'd take PrinceJudar's soft, moderate approach. I was always a hardliner, but I realize that it may not be the best way to have a "rational" discussion, especially with those one considers irrational and treats them as such.



Sir_jamesalot wrote:


Ranwolf wrote:

I mean you always choose the middle of the road option, that you seek to offend as small a number of people as possible. I say your back bone is lacking and you are unworthy of anything since you seek not to offend. Those who will not fight for a cause are unworthy of anything.


Does boot camp involve being kicked in the head? Because that's how you sound today.


Jesus Christ, did you really have to go there? I know it is Ranwolf, but you can't....I can't....we can't....
17711 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / B.C, Canada
Offline
Posted 6/1/16 , edited 6/1/16

PeripheralVisionary wrote:



They told me to cut back on calling people bigots, even when I reasoned WHY I think they're bigots, especially concerning my interactions with Holy in a thread awhile back. I thought I'd take PrinceJudar's soft, moderate approach. I was always a hardliner, but I realize that it may not be the best way to have a "rational" discussion, especially with those one considers irrational and treats them as such.






PrinceJudar is many things but I hardly consider her as soft as you've become lately PV. Those unwilling to defend their viewpoints with life experiences should remain silent. After all PV what do you truly know? Your life is lived in relative comfort, you've never been forced to face the realities of life.
30446 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
It doesn't matter.
Offline
Posted 6/1/16

PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Jesus Christ, did you really have to go there? I know it is Ranwolf, but you can't....I can't....we can't....


No, I didn't ave to go there. I didn't have to make baseless assumptions and insults in place of substantial arguments.
2656 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / F / England
Offline
Posted 6/1/16

runec wrote:


couvier wrote:
this. = v=
and did he really call LGBT a mental disorder!? o-o


You should hop over to the transgender bathroom thread. Its no fun if you just start at the bottom of the rabbit hole. ;p


It's a must read. Have tissues ready


HolyDrumstick wrote:

But, if I do, check your pulse. If your heart is still beating, you'll live.


Seriously, though. I feel like people are too quick to get offended simply because someone doesn't agree with their lifestyle.


Late to the party, but just because somebody disagrees with your opinion, does not mean you've offended them.
I don't know how my lifestyle has any bearing on whether or not I take offence either.
Lets say for a second that I had taken offence to any number of the comments about the trans community made in the other post. How does that give you any information about my 'lifestyle' in the first place, let alone enough to agree/disagree.

Lots of assumptions being made I think.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.