First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
Post Reply Trump: 'Second Amendment people' could deal with Clinton
Posted 8/10/16
51373 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M
Offline
Posted 8/10/16
It seems like every time Hillary gets in trouble or her poll numbers go down (or both), Trump decides to rescue her by opening his big fat mouth. Works every time. He can't be doing this by coincidence. Unless he's really that retarded, which I doubt.
14767 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Online
Posted 8/10/16 , edited 8/10/16
In late breaking news, Trump supporters are still creepy lunatics:
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/man-scales-trump-tower-manhattan-suction-cups-article-1.2746270
(And no, I couldn't find a YouTube clip of Christopher Reeve saying "Elevator out of order?")

Okay, show of hands:
How many right now are imagining Burt Lancaster as Trump, saying "Shoot him down...Shoot to kill"?
7 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
56 / M
Offline
Posted 8/10/16
Close your eyes. Imagine the circus Trump would have made and the never ending congressional committees the republicans would have created if Hillary had made this comment.
82334 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
38 / M
Offline
Posted 8/11/16 , edited 8/11/16

EichiXIII wrote:



"After" is implied because he is saying if she gets to pick her judges, which only would occur after she gets presidency, there is nothing anyone, except gun rights advocates, can do.


Even if you are interpreting it as actions the second amendment people would take "after" she has appointed anti-gun judges, why would you jump to the conclusion of insinuating assassination? Assassination would be pointless "after" appointing the judges. If anything, I would interpret it as saying that they could revolt. Second amendment advocates have expressed the opinion before that one of the reasons for the second amendment is that the people could fight the government if it turned to tyranny. So, it fits better as a joke as well, though still a distasteful and humorless one.

Edit:
Actually, I've heard more than one person talk about how they would be concerned that there would be revolt if Trump got in. Frankly, I could see there being revolt if either got in. The country just seems so split and angry these days.
614 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 8/11/16

ishe5555 wrote:


EichiXIII wrote:



"After" is implied because he is saying if she gets to pick her judges, which only would occur after she gets presidency, there is nothing anyone, except gun rights advocates, can do.


Even if you are interpreting it as actions the second amendment people would take "after" she has appointed anti-gun judges, why would you jump to the conclusion of insinuating assassination? Assassination would be pointless "after" appointing the judges. If anything, I would interpret it as saying that they could revolt. Second amendment advocates have expressed the opinion before that one of the reasons for the second amendment is that the people could fight the government if it turned to tyranny. So, it fits better as a joke as well, though still a distasteful and humorless one.

Edit:
Actually, I've heard more than one person talk about how they would be concerned that there would be revolt if Trump got in. Frankly, I could see there being revolt if either got in. The country just seems so split and angry these days.


I don't believe I ever said assassination. That particular post of mine was simply saying that "after" was implied. My personal belief is that it doesn't matter how he meant it. The only thing that matters is whether a mentally unstable person might act on it.
17031 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
34 / F / In a van down by...
Offline
Posted 8/11/16

archersea9 wrote:

Well what do you expect? This is how they were with Mitt Romney back in the 2012 election too, difference was the Mitt didn't fight back. But, it doesn't matter as long as it hurts the party that they want to lose in the election. If any of the 16 other republican candidates were the nominee, the media still would act this way.


'Cept Mitt never threatened to kill 'Bama.


You know one of those redneck fucks will try to kill Clinton too....
16295 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Midland, Texas
Offline
Posted 8/11/16
There was one British fuckboi who tried to kill trump in Vegas during his campaign already. So, it's happened to him. Nothing of that sort has happened to Clinton. I also believe that there will more attempts on Trump's life if this race gets close, while there won't be any on Clinton. I mean it's already happened once before so it'll probably happen again. But that's why the secret service is there for both of the candidates. Trump has a bad habit of being an easy target since he pretty much wings it all the time too. He might be the one who gets assassinated rather the Clinton. Who knows?
eldos1 
81207 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
36
Offline
Posted 8/11/16
Clinton in 2008 about running vs. Obama interview..

HILLARY CLINTON: ….I don’t know….I don’t …I find it curious, because…it is unprecedented in history. I don’t understand it, you know between my opponent and his camp and some in the media there has been this…urgency to end this, and you know, I … historically that makes no sense, so I find it a bit of a mystery..

ARGUS LEADER: You don’t buy the unity argument?

HILLARY CLINTON: I don’t. (crosstalk)….because again I’ve been around long enough, uh,… my husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary, uhhh..somewhere in the middle of June..

ARGUS LEADER: …June…

HILLARY CLINTON: (crosstalk)…right?… We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June, in California, ah, I…I just don’t understand it. There’s lots of speculation about why it is, but ah…
17031 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
34 / F / In a van down by...
Offline
Posted 8/11/16

archersea9 wrote:

There was one British fuckboi who tried to kill trump in Vegas during his campaign already. So, it's happened to him. Nothing of that sort has happened to Clinton. I also believe that there will more attempts on Trump's life if this race gets close, while there won't be any on Clinton. I mean it's already happened once before so it'll probably happen again. But that's why the secret service is there for both of the candidates. Trump has a bad habit of being an easy target since he pretty much wings it all the time too. He might be the one who gets assassinated rather the Clinton. Who knows?


Trump would wing it like 'OBAMA/CROOKED HILLARY SET ME UP TO GET KILLED! BURN THEM!'


10831 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
13 / F / California
Offline
Posted 8/13/16
14767 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Online
Posted 8/13/16 , edited 8/13/16

VZ68 wrote:



I see that Trump is already adopting the strategy of blaming any losses in Pennsylvania as all the fault of that wall-crawling menace...
7244 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / Pensacola
Offline
Posted 8/13/16
the 2nd amendment is the only way to fix this country.
10185 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / F / The state of Wash...
Offline
Posted 8/13/16
Posted 8/13/16 , edited 8/13/16
Liberals are pussy thats the way I think of it.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.