First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
Post Reply Hillary Clinton over charging for donations
20811 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Bundaberg, Queens...
Online
Posted 9/15/16

Xxanthar wrote:


Ryulightorb wrote:


Xxanthar wrote:

They deserve it for giving a crook money.


Better then the alternative


You are not even American. Go vote for a kangaroo.


Still impacts me buddy so I can have an opinion.

though I guess if trump gets elected the Aud will rise as the usd drops
16757 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Hoosierville
Offline
Posted 9/15/16 , edited 9/15/16

sinoakayumi wrote:

Is this more scapegoating attempts? First, the Republican use a fake Hillary Clinton account on some social media like Twitter to sponsor wars and immigration under Hillary name while blocking the impostor account and posts from Hillary's accounts. Then, the Republican impersonate Democrat to further enforce the scapegoating. I won't be surprise if this one of the many conspiracies by some collective hivemind to desperately attack Hillary Clinton especially when some ambiguous terms like 'Hillary', 'Clinton', and 'Clintons' are used in an article...


Nah wells fargo is having a huge problem with fraud charges against the clinton campaign.

Desperately attack... HAHAHAHA! She has a level 5 hurricane of secrets and corruption hitting her right now. Hell her health problems are probably caused because she is stressed about what all could be revealed.


Ryulightorb wrote:


Xxanthar wrote:


Ryulightorb wrote:


Xxanthar wrote:

They deserve it for giving a crook money.


Better then the alternative


You are not even American. Go vote for a kangaroo.


Still impacts me buddy so I can have an opinion.

though I guess if trump gets elected the Aud will rise as the usd drops


Actually Trump will be great for businesses. Investment communities are buying/selling based on who is going to win and Trump is the riser.
20811 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Bundaberg, Queens...
Online
Posted 9/15/16

Xxanthar wrote:


Ryulightorb wrote:


Xxanthar wrote:


Ryulightorb wrote:


Xxanthar wrote:

They deserve it for giving a crook money.


Better then the alternative


You are not even American. Go vote for a kangaroo.


Still impacts me buddy so I can have an opinion.

though I guess if trump gets elected the Aud will rise as the usd drops


Yes, you're an economist now. Forget the president, get a kangaroo to post for you.


His ideas are flawed and you are sounding like an idiot
4706 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Online
Posted 9/15/16

Emtro wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:
...
I cannot for the life of me tell whether or not you're speaking ironically.


Well, I'm not sure you call it ironic. Rather, it was some sarcasm as you probably will not see more articles about this from other sources and you definitely will not see this in the mainstream media because of the fact the evil order she belongs too has the power to do those sorts of things.


Results for my search for "Clinton overcharging for donations" led me to over a dozen pages of stories on the subject so I think it is clear that that first part was bullshit.

And I'm not sure what you would consider mainstream media, seeing as I don't live in america and all, but the observer, forbes and the new york post have all reported on it, so I would say the mainstream media is already speaking out about it.
10613 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Rabbit Horse
Offline
Posted 9/15/16
Hillary for Prison 2016. can't say i'm surprised about the news.
edit: wait, they also stole during Bill's presidency? throw them both to jail.
13131 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M
Offline
Posted 9/15/16 , edited 9/15/16

Xxanthar wrote:

Do you not understand that trump is not trying to stop LEGAL immigration?


To be fair, Trump is also trying to reform legal immigration. According to his own website, he pretty much wants to prevent immigration until the issues with unemployment within the country are solved. Now, without speaking about whether or not that idea would work, I think it is difficult to deny that Trump does plan to at least limit legal immigration. Further, he believes that the process of immigration should be extremely difficult and costly so again, he isn't exactly warm on legal immigration either.

"Immigration moderation. Before any new green cards are issued to foreign workers abroad, there will be a pause where employers will have to hire from the domestic pool of unemployed immigrant and native workers. "

" But legal immigrants do not and should not enter easily. It’s a long, costly, draining, and often frustrating experience-by design."

EDIT: Oh, and here is an article talking about how Trump has proposed "the most significant restriction on legal immigration since Congress slashed it after World War I": http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/trumps-proposal-for-legal-immigration/499061/
Banned
6934 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
In a basket of de...
Offline
Posted 9/15/16

sundin13 wrote:


Xxanthar wrote:

Do you not understand that trump is not trying to stop LEGAL immigration?


To be fair, Trump is also trying to reform legal immigration. According to his own website, he pretty much wants to prevent immigration until the issues with unemployment within the country are solved. Now, without speaking about whether or not that idea would work, I think it is difficult to deny that Trump does plan to at least limit legal immigration. Further, he believes that the process of immigration should be extremely difficult and costly so again, he isn't exactly warm on legal immigration either.

"Immigration moderation. Before any new green cards are issued to foreign workers abroad, there will be a pause where employers will have to hire from the domestic pool of unemployed immigrant and native workers. "

" But legal immigrants do not and should not enter easily. It’s a long, costly, draining, and often frustrating experience-by design."


This is how immigration would work if our existing laws were followed. Want changes in immigration, let them change our existing laws. You can't just pick and choose what laws that you want to enforce. That's not law and order. Doing nothing is sure not going to fix the problem.
Banned
6934 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
In a basket of de...
Offline
Posted 9/15/16 , edited 9/15/16

Ryulightorb wrote:


Funny how I don't see Australia letting anyone in who wants to live there. Australia has some of the most strict immigration policies in the world. If your friends are as bright as you, please persuade them to stay there.



Well you obviously don't know Australia well we are very open and welcoming to immigrants who come legally.

speaking about bright when you can't look in the mirror and see that you aren't as smart as you think you are.
Please don't insult my Inteligence whilst you act like an idiot yourself it makes you look bad.


I had a friend from Switzerland who got a year long visa to Australia.
When your Visa is up in Australia, you go home, or they come and get you and send you back unlike America. Our problem with immigrants are the millions that are here ILLEGALLY.

If you look back at the trail of quotes you will see that it was YOU who started throwing around the word idiot. And you have the nerve to report my post?
13131 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M
Offline
Posted 9/15/16

Xxanthar wrote:


sundin13 wrote:


Xxanthar wrote:

Do you not understand that trump is not trying to stop LEGAL immigration?


To be fair, Trump is also trying to reform legal immigration. According to his own website, he pretty much wants to prevent immigration until the issues with unemployment within the country are solved. Now, without speaking about whether or not that idea would work, I think it is difficult to deny that Trump does plan to at least limit legal immigration. Further, he believes that the process of immigration should be extremely difficult and costly so again, he isn't exactly warm on legal immigration either.

"Immigration moderation. Before any new green cards are issued to foreign workers abroad, there will be a pause where employers will have to hire from the domestic pool of unemployed immigrant and native workers. "

" But legal immigrants do not and should not enter easily. It’s a long, costly, draining, and often frustrating experience-by design."


This is how immigration would work if our existing laws were followed. Want changes in immigration, let them change our existing laws. You can't just pick and choose what laws that you want to enforce. That's not law and order. Doing nothing is sure not going to fix the problem.


What laws are being broken to allow people to legally enter the country?

And again, I am not talking about the efficacy of these programs. I am simply pointing out that they exist, since you incorrectly asserted that Trump was not fighting against Legal Immigration.

PS: Not sure if you saw my edit, but here is an article on the subject which says that Trump's policy would be " the most significant restriction on legal immigration since Congress slashed it after World War I": http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/trumps-proposal-for-legal-immigration/499061/
Emtro 
1559 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 9/15/16

octorockandroll wrote:


Emtro wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:
...
I cannot for the life of me tell whether or not you're speaking ironically.


Well, I'm not sure you call it ironic. Rather, it was some sarcasm as you probably will not see more articles about this from other sources and you definitely will not see this in the mainstream media because of the fact the evil order she belongs too has the power to do those sorts of things.


Results for my search for "Clinton overcharging for donations" led me to over a dozen pages of stories on the subject so I think it is clear that that first part was bullshit.

And I'm not sure what you would consider mainstream media, seeing as I don't live in america and all, but the observer, forbes and the new york post have all reported on it, so I would say the mainstream media is already speaking out about it.


LOL, two or twelve, they're in the same category. Now here's the irony. If you had googled "Mainstream Media" you would have the information to help you understand the difference.
Banned
6934 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
In a basket of de...
Offline
Posted 9/15/16
Sorry, I'm not quoting that mess.

here is what you said:

His ideas are flawed and you are sounding like an idiot :D

You were not referring to trump.

How can I make this clear to you...

Do you not understand that trump is not trying to stop LEGAL immigration?

We are not surrounded by water like you. We have borders and millions of people cross them ILLEGALLY.
We have hundreds of thousands who overstay their visa ILLEGALLY
This is what trump want's to stop. ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
4706 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Online
Posted 9/15/16

Emtro wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:


Emtro wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:
...
I cannot for the life of me tell whether or not you're speaking ironically.


Well, I'm not sure you call it ironic. Rather, it was some sarcasm as you probably will not see more articles about this from other sources and you definitely will not see this in the mainstream media because of the fact the evil order she belongs too has the power to do those sorts of things.


Results for my search for "Clinton overcharging for donations" led me to over a dozen pages of stories on the subject so I think it is clear that that first part was bullshit.

And I'm not sure what you would consider mainstream media, seeing as I don't live in america and all, but the observer, forbes and the new york post have all reported on it, so I would say the mainstream media is already speaking out about it.


LOL, two or twelve, they're in the same category. Now here's the irony. If you had googled "Mainstream Media" you would have the information to help you understand the difference.


It's not that I don't understand the difference its just that I don't know the outreach of media outlets from a country that I do not live in.

Why the hell do I always need to spell obvious things like that out to morons like you?
4706 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Online
Posted 9/15/16

Xxanthar wrote:

Sorry, I'm not quoting that mess.

here is what you said:

His ideas are flawed and you are sounding like an idiot :D

You were not referring to trump.

How can I make this clear to you...

Do you not understand that trump is not trying to stop LEGAL immigration?

We are not surrounded by water like you. We have borders and millions of people cross them ILLEGALLY.
We have hundreds of thousands who overstay their visa ILLEGALLY
This is what trump want's to stop. ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION


Didn't Trump want to stop all muslims from immigrating? Because that seems like someone trying to stop legal immigration to me. It also seems pretty fucking stupid.
13131 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M
Offline
Posted 9/15/16 , edited 9/15/16

It's not that I don't understand the difference its just that I don't know the outreach of media outlets from a country that I do not live in.

Why the hell do I always need to spell obvious things like that out to morons like you?


I think Forbes and New York Post would be considered "mainstream" by most people around these parts
16757 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Hoosierville
Offline
Posted 9/15/16

Emtro wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:


Emtro wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:
...
I cannot for the life of me tell whether or not you're speaking ironically.


Well, I'm not sure you call it ironic. Rather, it was some sarcasm as you probably will not see more articles about this from other sources and you definitely will not see this in the mainstream media because of the fact the evil order she belongs too has the power to do those sorts of things.


Results for my search for "Clinton overcharging for donations" led me to over a dozen pages of stories on the subject so I think it is clear that that first part was bullshit.

And I'm not sure what you would consider mainstream media, seeing as I don't live in america and all, but the observer, forbes and the new york post have all reported on it, so I would say the mainstream media is already speaking out about it.


LOL, two or twelve, they're in the same category. Now here's the irony. If you had googled "Mainstream Media" you would have the information to help you understand the difference.


Old news but still good news. http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/05/clinton-foundation-donors-include-dozens-of-media-organizations-individuals-207228

First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.