First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
Post Reply Julian Asange has his internet cut by "state party"
Posted 10/19/16 , edited 10/19/16
point proven? that you basically have no idea about physics or what physically impossible actually entails? LOL yup, you nailgunned your foot right to the floor on that one, pal!
46651 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 10/19/16
Yeeeeeeah. There really is no point in talking to you, you are completely off the rails. You can have this round friend.
Posted 10/19/16
LOL....its ok, I can sympathize with the worldview that you wont let go of, it just means so much more of a dangerous world to believe in reality. I'd have destroyed you a hundred different ways on technical grounds anyway, so I guess you saved yourself from being made even more of a fool of. mocking someone for questioning the official story on 911, indeed! LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL *mops brow* what a hoot.
1044 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 10/19/16
Mah dude, i was rooting for you until you started talking about the 911 conspiracy, the other guy brought it up to see if you were gonna go on a rant about it but then u actually did. In a debate you gotta let sleeping illuminati lay.
1044 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 10/19/16
Let dank memes be your guide
qwueri 
16470 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 10/19/16


Trying to curry a nod from a popular president, courting a big donor, and trying to game poll dates? Sounds like typical politician stuff, granted the last one is always unsavory. That the only one to work was maybe the big donor sounds like a system that isn't somehow under Hillary's thumb.


RaisedInACult wrote:

qwueri go look at some of the un-hacked polls and get back to us after you see them going 79% or better for trump. its a relief seeing that the general populace isnt that freakin stupid after all


Snap-shoting an unscientific poll that can be flooded by online communities or even just a few scripts, is obviously gamed by somebody in support of Trump and claiming it's Hillary's supporters doing the hacking. Thanks for the laugh.
Posted 10/19/16

qwueri wrote:

Snap-shoting an unscientific poll that can be flooded by online communities or even just a few scripts, is obviously gamed by somebody in support of Trump and claiming it's Hillary's supporters doing the hacking. Thanks for the laugh.


"curated"
qwueri 
16470 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 10/19/16 , edited 10/19/16

RaisedInACult wrote:


qwueri wrote:

Snap-shoting an unscientific poll that can be flooded by online communities or even just a few scripts, is obviously gamed by somebody in support of Trump and claiming it's Hillary's supporters doing the hacking. Thanks for the laugh.


"curated"


*By all means, disregard scientific polling while latching onto online opinion polls until they disagree with you. Meanwhile, I'll keep rolling my eyes at actual polls for not meaning anything either.

Posted 10/19/16

bigred109 wrote:

Mah dude, i was rooting for you until you started talking about the 911 conspiracy, the other guy brought it up to see if you were gonna go on a rant about it but then u actually did. In a debate you gotta let sleeping illuminati lay.


*shrugs* I love how people talk about obvious things but then something so blatantly obvious and then backed up by thousands of engineers, architects, and pilots that dont have their jobs, livelihood, or actual lives on the line if they dont maintain the lie.

The patriot act was whipped right out of their back pockets within days of it happening - such a bad happening was the only was such unconstitutional garbage was going to pass.

To have it be so in your face that they've somehow convinced millions of people to believe a nonphysical event, is just absolutely amazing, it just makes me incredulous.

Gold heist, insurance fraud, coverup of Enron & Worldcomm investigations, beginning of the war on terror and placing the USA into police state mode, reinstated the opium crop in afghanistan and prevented a pipeline going to china from Iran - its like jeez, do people even see all these outcomes and put 2+2 together?

Nope, cuz jet fuel cant melt dank memes? *facepalm* I dun get it. It was a big fucking deal, to quote crazy ol uncle joe.
Posted 10/19/16 , edited 10/19/16

qwueri wrote:


RaisedInACult wrote:


qwueri wrote:

Snap-shoting an unscientific poll that can be flooded by online communities or even just a few scripts, is obviously gamed by somebody in support of Trump and claiming it's Hillary's supporters doing the hacking. Thanks for the laugh.


"curated"


*By all means, disregard scientific polling while latching onto online opinion polls until they disagree with you. Meanwhile, I'll keep rolling my eyes at actual polls for not meaning anything either.



So you're telling me that you are making the assumption that these polls cannot be manipulated? Gotcha. I just wish people would apply the same standards of logic across the board. Clintons and DNC proved to be hacking all over the place, Hillary's website even said on it welcome to the only nationally televised 18 month hackathon, and you're saying "sorry, those are scientific and I see no reason to believe they have not been manipulated?"



Are you sure you dont want to just return to the whole grab her by the p*ssy thing? Its a little easier and it keeps one from having to actually look at crimes.

Now of course Drudge is going to skew DT....but that? LOL....
24271 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M
Offline
Posted 10/19/16

qwueri wrote:



Trying to curry a nod from a popular president, courting a big donor, and trying to game poll dates? Sounds like typical politician stuff, granted the last one is always unsavory. That the only one to work was maybe the big donor sounds like a system that isn't somehow under Hillary's thumb.


RaisedInACult wrote:

qwueri go look at some of the un-hacked polls and get back to us after you see them going 79% or better for trump. its a relief seeing that the general populace isnt that freakin stupid after all


Snap-shoting an unscientific poll that can be flooded by online communities or even just a few scripts, is obviously gamed by somebody in support of Trump and claiming it's Hillary's supporters doing the hacking. Thanks for the laugh.


It doesn't sound like you support this behavior but it does sound like you are apathetic of the whole thing. Not much different Trump supporters ignoring the abuse allegations.

Win or lose the only message this will send the DNC is they just need to try harder to hide they nastiness. Trump took that option away from Republicans.
runec 
28294 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 10/19/16
Putting aside the absurdity of thinking there's a large scale conspiracy going on that's easily accessible to anyone that has a web browser: The fark would even be the end game of "hacking" ( lawl ) online polls? They're virtually meaningless aside from lulz.
qwueri 
16470 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 10/19/16

RaisedInACult wrote:

So you're telling me that you are making the assumption that these polls cannot be manipulated? Gotcha. I just wish people would apply the same standards of logic across the board. Clintons and DNC proved to be hacking all over the place, Hillary's website even said on it welcome to the only nationally televised 18 month hackathon, and you're saying "sorry, those are scientific and I see no reason to believe they have not been manipulated?"



Are you sure you dont want to just return to the whole grab her by the p*ssy thing? Its a little easier and it keeps one from having to actually look at crimes.

Now of course Drudge is going to skew DT....but that? LOL....


A scientific poll being manipulated is strictly at the level of the pollster. An online opinion poll is open to be manipulated by anyone participating. Even an opinion poll could potentially be manipulated by the site polling it. Your faith in pollsters is hilariously selective.

Both are open to participant bias, with opinion polls relying on users of a particular site and scientific polls on participants willing to give the pollster the time of day. Even if somehow accurate, at best they're a thermometer of public opinion at the time of polling. In terms of predicting election outcomes, they should have be taken overly serious.

Double points for working in another conspiracy theory though. Clearly the Clinton needs to hire IT to hack Drudge Report polls instead of protecting her staff's e-mails.


MysticGon wrote:

It doesn't sound like you support this behavior but it does sound like you are apathetic of the whole thing. Not much different Trump supporters ignoring the abuse allegations.

Win or lose the only message this will send the DNC is they just need to try harder to hide they nastiness. Trump took that option away from Republicans.


Hey now, if Clinton did anything substantive I'd be right there with you. What she's done is typical politician stuff. Politician stuff that needs continued public scrutiny, but so far nothing all that eyebrow raising. When a genuine video of her saying she'd 'grab him by the d**k' I'll start researching sane third party options.
Posted 10/19/16
legitimacy and perception must be maintained. I've seen evidence of things having been hacked and inconsistencies abound. you're basing what you believe on......belief? or, cnn, or something?

another appeal to incredulity, you really love that one dont you
runec 
28294 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 10/19/16
What legitimacy does an online poll have exactly? ;p
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.