First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
Post Reply Clinton Campaign staffers caught planning to incite violence at Trump rallies
Posted 10/18/16
You seem to forget that the USA was put forth as a republic, not a democracy. But keep watching the news, it'll tell you so many great things, like all the evils of hitler I mean donald trump. And please vote for nice ol granny hillary, that doesnt have a mean bone in her body. thx cnn!
2016 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / Your Body
Offline
Posted 10/18/16
37353 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 10/18/16

PhantomGundam wrote:

Just when I think this election can't get anymore depressing, October happens... We have one major party candidate who got caught secretly bragging about sexual assault. Now we have the other major party candidate caught secretly inciting violence at her opponent's rallies.

"BUT WE NEED TO VOTE FOR ONE TO STOP THE OTHER!!!!!!!!!!" - American logic. I have never been more ashamed to be an American before this election.

The only thing more sickening is seeing millions of voters making excuses for their incredibly flawed candidates. This goes for both sides. When the DNC and Hillary's campaign are revealed to have been inciting Trump's supporters to be violent, they're completely despicable, but somehow that excuses every bad thing Trump has done? It doesn't work like that! Trump himself has publicly told his supporters to act violently multiple times at his own rallies, but his supporters just say "he didn't mean it like that! Stop twisting his words you cuck!" It doesn't matter who is inciting violence. Anyone who does that is doing something wrong. As far as I'm concerned, both Trump and Hillary should be on jail for a large number of illegal actions including inciting violence. The day we elect one of these criminals is the day the greatest democracy on earth is officially dead.


Yeah.... Unfortunately, I think we're kind of stuck with those two choices. If there wasn't any dirty dealing on Hillary's part, the race would have been between Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. In a race between those two, Sanders would be miles ahead of Trump. Instead, Hillary cheated Sanders with her dirty back room deals with the DNC, so now we're stuck with Utterly Corrupt Law Breaking Police State Hillary, and Can't Open His Mouth Without Sticking His Foot In It Donald. This is why the race is so close.
Posted 10/18/16
lol....this race is so close because they even hack polls like drudge, who showed 87%-13% an hour after 2nd debate, and was close to within 8 points by morning.

this race aint close at all, voter and electoral fraud is the only thing that's going to give it the appearance of being close.
1596 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / US
Offline
Posted 10/18/16
Still not voting for Trump..
13131 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M
Offline
Posted 10/18/16 , edited 10/18/16

RaisedInACult wrote:

lol....this race is so close because they even hack polls like drudge, who showed 87%-13% an hour after 2nd debate, and was close to within 8 points by morning.

this race aint close at all, voter and electoral fraud is the only thing that's going to give it the appearance of being close.


Mfw people don't know the difference between scientific and unscientific polls




RaisedInACult wrote:

You seem to forget that the USA was put forth as a republic, not a democracy. But keep watching the news, it'll tell you so many great things, like all the evils of hitler I mean donald trump. And please vote for nice ol granny hillary, that doesnt have a mean bone in her body. thx cnn!


USA is a democratic republic...? Watchu on about?
22126 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / F
Offline
Posted 10/18/16


You are actually excusing this?! Folks talk about how dangerous and dirty Trump is, but this is downright despicable! It is atrocious! I never even imagined that ANYONE did this sort of thing!! I'm seeing this behavior for the first time - EVER!!! What do you mean, "we all know all know this is going on?!" This is the first time something like this has ever been exposed!!!

I've seen tax cheats. I've seen liars. I've seen bribery. However, I've never seen people paid to incite riots at political functions ever before! The one's I've seen are acts committed by the politician him/herself, but acts committed by unknown paid agents to incite riots? That's on a whole other level! That is something I've never seen done before!!

And YOU are excusing it!!!!

Instead of excusing this behavior, you should be up in arms, condemning this behavior!! Even more than ever, I am more opposed to Hillary, because she's Hillary Clinton, and she approves of this behavior!!!


LOL OH MY GOD This just in: just like attacks in anime, your arguments get stronger the more words you capitalize and yell.

First of all, you say this is the first time seeing something like this? You're joking, right? Trump literally invites his supporters to beat the shit out of protestors and tells them he'll pay for it. Tell me, are you excusing that? What is are these people doing? They're being paid to be protestors, and paint targets on their back in hopes that one of these violent creeps will bite. Nothing they are doing here is illegal. Is it a little underhanded? Yes a little, but illegal? No. They aren't being paid to assault anyone, it's Trump's supporters that are doing that. Again, they are perfectly allowed to do this. You could do it yourself at a Clinton event too! Free of charge! You'll be delighted to get sneers and glares around you, but assaulted? I don't think so.

But of course, it doesn't matter if the angry orange cheeto over and over again applauds, incentivizes, and goads his supporters to literally attack protestors. Because Clinton or her affiliates paying people to go into an event to get Trump supporters to prove the point that Trump supporters are angry lunatics with no self control is truly vile.

"What do you mean, "we all know all know this is going on?!" This is the first time something like this has ever been exposed!!!" Uuuuuuh, because protestors getting paid to be protestors is called organized political activism and it's perfectly legal. There's nothing to 'expose'. It's political discourse. It's a democracy. Again, the only difference this time is that trump supporters are unique in their willingness to get violent towards protestors (bernie bros mirror, but not nearly to the same scope), so the opponent is, understandably, capitalizing on that as much as they can.
Banned
6934 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
In a basket of de...
Offline
Posted 10/18/16
Liberals have no choice but to deceive voters. Who would get elected if they said, "I want to tax you for every dollar that you have and give it to the millions of Illegal invaders that we let flood into the country so that they can illegally vote for us."
lawdog 
40433 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 10/18/16
And now we have video of them plotting voter fraud!
Posted 10/18/16 , edited 10/18/16
we had videos of them committing voter fraud in 2012 with Obama, but nobody paid attention to them


granted, it didnt come along with such gems as

"We've been bussing in people to deal with you f'n assholes for 50 years and we're not going to stop now"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs



Its awesome how he tells it like it is, that our elections have been manipulated all along just like some of us have asserted
1807 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M
Offline
Posted 10/18/16 , edited 10/18/16

sundin13

Mfw people don't know the difference between scientific and unscientific polls



Regardless of which type of poll the media actually performs, none of their polls are trust worthy since they are all biased to a candidate (aka paid off).

Plus its hard to find independent polls since even google searches are initially biased toward who pays to be on top and then perpetuated by hits afterwards. How many times do you guys go to the 2nd, 3rd page or beyond when searching for something?
13131 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M
Offline
Posted 10/18/16 , edited 10/18/16

Solefyre wrote:


sundin13

Mfw people don't know the difference between scientific and unscientific polls



Regardless of which type of poll the media actually performs, none of their polls are trust worthy since they are all biased to a candidate (aka paid off).

Plus its hard to find independent polls since even google searches are initially biased toward who pays to be on top and then perpetuated by hits afterwards. How many times do you guys go to the 2nd, 3rd page or beyond when searching for something?


I use fivethirtyeight, which compiles all available scientific polls (to my knowledge) and balances them based on how accurate or slanted they have been in the past and uses that to project the current popular vote share as well as the odds of either candidate winning using three different models (Polls plus (which includes factors outside of polling like the economy and historical trends), Polls only (which only uses the polls) and Now-cast (Who would win if election was today)). Also, many of the polls are by Universities and other non-media organizations.

Non-scientific polls are a novelty. Scientific polls are an indication.
1807 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M
Offline
Posted 10/18/16
Sundin13 thanks, I'll check them out.
First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.