First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
Post Reply Yey. No time to build a bomb shelter.
10813 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
47 / M / Auburn, Washington
Offline
Posted 10/21/16

AnimeAddictANN69 wrote:

your links are not hyperlinks.. use the chain icon (next to image icon) when you are posting links

it's probably why..


I don't watch blind links. If you don't tell me what's on the other side and why I want to watch it, I automatically assume it's either a bullshit affiliate link where you get paid when people click it, or some really fucked up porn. Either way, I don't care and I don't want to watch it, and if you have something better you should probably say something.
5926 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / montana
Offline
Posted 10/21/16
anyone who thinks they are gonna ride it out in a bomb shelter is only fooling themselves. unless planning to stay in one for about 300,000 years. the plutonium fires from the worlds collection of stockpiles wont allow it.
10263 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 10/21/16

trollbutter wrote:

anyone who thinks they are gonna ride it out in a bomb shelter is only fooling themselves. unless planning to stay in one for about 300,000 years. the plutonium fires from the worlds collection of stockpiles wont allow it.


False, you only need to ride out until you die of other causes. :D

By that time, you'll wish you'd sat in a lawn-chair getting high and watching the fireworks until you were turned to ash.
10263 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 10/21/16

cdarklock wrote:
I don't watch blind links. If you don't tell me what's on the other side and why I want to watch it, I automatically assume it's either a bullshit affiliate link where you get paid when people click it, or some really fucked up porn. Either way, I don't care and I don't want to watch it, and if you have something better you should probably say something.


Depending on what neighborhood of the vast internet you are visiting, this can be really solid advice.

I generally will click anything HERE.

But, if one of my buddies on discord posts a like and it doesn't automatically show you what you are clicking, you should probably avoid clicking it.

That being said, even the stuff that does pop up is terrible at times. I've seen way too many dick pics for a straight man.
1150 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
16 / M
Offline
Posted 10/21/16
37319 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 10/21/16
I can't fucking believe this..... Putin actually begged the media to report how desparate Russia is, and that WW3 is upon us, and MSNBC, CBS, ABC, etc, etc, etc. didn't even make a blip from it?

No... I take it back. I've been saying all along that the Republican Party and the Democratic Party have been working hand in hand to steadily degrade our individual freedoms, while strengthening the government's hold on the U.S.A.

Here is proof of it, right there. I'm gonna say this. I'm confident that the U.S. and NATO can kick Russia's ass, from here to there, and back again, but the issue is why?

If our common enemy is ISIS, why aren't we working better with Russia to destroy ISIS?

Also, I can see how Russia and China can ally to oppose NATO. This is going to be a real mess. Clinton really wants to crush Russia. Why?

I'm a former U.S. Marine. I'm so anti Russia it isn't even funny. However, I've never seen things from their point of view until now. Russia sees itself as vulnerable! The U.S. together with NATO, and the former Warsaw Pack countries who are now members of NATO, are ALL arrayed against Russia.

This is why Russia has been becoming more and more belligerent and more and more militaristic. The mainstream media in the U.S. makes Russia to be super strong, and the U.S. to be vulnerable. However, I've never seen Putin beg the media to report the news!

What in hell is going on?

Domestically, I've always believed that the Republican Party and the Democratic Party worked hand in hand to control the direction the United States took. A direction that lead to a Police State. But what if that was not the road they were on? What if the road they were on was World Domination? Then wouldn't that mean that they don't care about the United States at all? Would it mean that what they are after is World Domination? A one world government, ruled by the Republican and Democratic elite in the U.S., and other world leaders from around the globe?

Now that I think about it, Russia doesn't really have global military reach. Only the United States has this ability.... If you think of it that way, then who is the real threat? If you think of it that way, wouldn't it explains Putin's plea to Western Media to report on Russia's fear?

In the U.S. mainstream media is owned by only a very few entities. So, it is easy to control the flow of news. If the very few owners of the mainstream media are indeed controlling the news reported in the U.S., wouldn't that mean that what we are being told is being controlled? Wouldn't that mean that how we respond is being controlled?
10263 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 10/21/16

DeadlyOats wrote:
In the U.S. mainstream media is owned by only a very few entities. So, it is easy to control the flow of news. If the very few owners of the mainstream media are indeed controlling the news reported in the U.S., wouldn't that mean that what we are being told is being controlled? Wouldn't that mean that how we respond is being controlled?


I have no issue with Russia. I mean, Russia is not the USSR. In fact, if I wasn't so damned American (also served in the Corps, Semper Fi. 1833 AAVs, Courthouse Bay, Camp Lejeune), I'd move to Russia. If I just had to pick another country, that's probably where I'd go.

But, the issue here is that Putin is like, "Hey, hey, look, your government is starting some shit that's going to cause a big war, and they aren't even telling you about it." Even if the US wins, we're still looking at a very dangerous war.

So, theories about why the US would want to make this happen? My thought is that the US can't really bully everyone in the world, we can't usher in a one world government, until it fully destroys any opposition to that. But, we can't just go pick fights with everyone, either, so we have to paint the picture that the US is acting in response to Russian aggression.

But, you know, that's just my opinion, man.
10594 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Online
Posted 10/21/16
We wouldn't have this problem if we simply build everything to withstand a direct bunker breaker strike.
37319 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 10/21/16

HolyDrumstick wrote:


DeadlyOats wrote:
In the U.S. mainstream media is owned by only a very few entities. So, it is easy to control the flow of news. If the very few owners of the mainstream media are indeed controlling the news reported in the U.S., wouldn't that mean that what we are being told is being controlled? Wouldn't that mean that how we respond is being controlled?


I have no issue with Russia. I mean, Russia is not the USSR. In fact, if I wasn't so damned American (also served in the Corps, Semper Fi. 1833 AAVs, Courthouse Bay, Camp Lejeune), I'd move to Russia. If I just had to pick another country, that's probably where I'd go.

But, the issue here is that Putin is like, "Hey, hey, look, your government is starting some shit that's going to cause a big war, and they aren't even telling you about it." Even if the US wins, we're still looking at a very dangerous war.

So, theories about why the US would want to make this happen? My thought is that the US can't really bully everyone in the world, we can't usher in a one world government, until it fully destroys any opposition to that. But, we can't just go pick fights with everyone, either, so we have to paint the picture that the US is acting in response to Russian aggression.

But, you know, that's just my opinion, man.


I'm not bagging on your opinion, man. I'm saying that our government, with the aid of mainstream media, is setting up the conditions to get us, the American people, ready to accept a war with Russia, while Russia is desperately trying to get us to negotiate a more peaceful settlement to the situation.

They have pride, too. You know? They don't want to look like a bunch of pussies. However, when you have all of the original NATO, combined with most of what used to be the Warsaw Pact, arrayed against you, you get really nervous, if you were Russia. You know?

And Russia still has Nukes. Hillary is talking war talk. Trump is talking peace talk. Trump may sound like a guy who keeps sticking his foot in his mouth, but he's talking peace, while Hillary, "who says what we want to hear, " is talking war.

War with Russia can only end in one way. Nuclear. Now I understand why Russia wanted us to set up "a joint command system to fight ISIS." They want us to work together. Not because they need us, but because they fear us. They want to show that they can work with us. However, our actions, are forcing them to take stronger and stronger actions. They want to show that they are not weak.

Russia is not weak, but they are grossly outnumbered. The U.S. and NATO has the advantage. How is it that I did not see this before?! I was thinking that Barak Obama was a weak president, leading us to a weak U.S. foreign policy that made Russia and China pick on us. Those two countries are facing the rest of the world! With the U.S. leading it!

Do you see it, now? Do you see what I'm saying?! Our government has been pushing them into a corner all of this time, with all of our allies, NATO and most of the Pacific Rim countries, all of this time!
10263 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 10/21/16


Yes. I think we should work with Russia against ISIS. And, I think you are right about it leading to nuclear war.

Gonna go ahead and disagree with the assessment that Russia would be completely, easily overwhelmed.

Considering that among our allies, we're almost the only ones with any significant military power, the fact that Russia and China could possibly unite, and the fact that we may lose allies, even if it doesn't look that way at first..... The war would be vastly more balanced than you think. In fact, if we tried to invade with troops rather than outright bomb, we might even lose.

On top of that, Russia has recently developed a system to disable our missile defense system, so we're not exactly safe from nuclear strikes if the choose to go that route. In addition, the system can leave other electronic systems completely disabled, meaning that the number of our ships means nothing, if they're stuck sitting in the water, unable to actually do anything. Look it up Khibiny.

So, if the war goes nuclear, we aren't exactly sitting pretty, ya know?

So, basically, yeah.... we'd probably win. No, it wouldn't be the butt-kicking you'd think it'd be.

We're talking about a World War, here. How smooth did the last two go?

4017 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Abyss
Offline
Posted 10/21/16

cdarklock wrote:


AnimeAddictANN69 wrote:

your links are not hyperlinks.. use the chain icon (next to image icon) when you are posting links

it's probably why..


I don't watch blind links. If you don't tell me what's on the other side and why I want to watch it, I automatically assume it's either a bullshit affiliate link where you get paid when people click it, or some really fucked up porn. Either way, I don't care and I don't want to watch it, and if you have something better you should probably say something.


Ight, I will tell you what is on this link I posted, just ignore the nsfw in the URL.

It is the pokemon Ditto dancing to the Konga!

https://matias.ma/nsfw/
37319 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 10/21/16

HolyDrumstick wrote:



Yes. I think we should work with Russia against ISIS. And, I think you are right about it leading to nuclear war.

Gonna go ahead and disagree with the assessment that Russia would be completely, easily overwhelmed.

Considering that among our allies, we're almost the only ones with any significant military power, the fact that Russia and China could possibly unite, and the fact that we may lose allies, even if it doesn't look that way at first..... The war would be vastly more balanced than you think. In fact, if we tried to invade with troops rather than outright bomb, we might even lose.

On top of that, Russia has recently developed a system to disable our missile defense system, so we're not exactly safe from nuclear strikes if the choose to go that route. In addition, the system can leave other electronic systems completely disabled, meaning that the number of our ships means nothing, if they're stuck sitting in the water, unable to actually do anything. Look it up Khibiny.

So, if the war goes nuclear, we aren't exactly sitting pretty, ya know?

So, basically, yeah.... we'd probably win. No, it wouldn't be the butt-kicking you'd think it'd be.

We're talking about a World War, here. How smooth did the last two go?



You misunderstood me. I did say we'd kick their ass, but I did not say we wouldn't pay for it. We would suffer mightily for our victory, and that would be just fine for those individuals who want it that way. With such chaos and disaster on our home fronts, these despots think they would be able to maintain power and they think they would be able to use the aftermath to further their control over us. That is their gamble. They want chaos. They want millions of us to die, all he better to control us.

The thing is that under such circumstances, history could easily go in another direction. Total anarchy. Total chaos. And despite a costly victory over Russia and China, other forces could arise that would rest control of the new world order from their grip and it could lead to a world similar to what is depicted in Fist of The North Star (minus the crazy marshal arts).
First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.