First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
Post Reply to be single is now labeled as a disability
18690 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F
Offline
Posted 10/24/16 , edited 10/24/16
10602 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 10/24/16
It does not seem like I am going to get a check for this. If they are not sending me money, why should I care? It isn'the like WHO has any credibility.
27257 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
39 / Inside your compu...
Offline
Posted 10/24/16
That is just stupid.
245 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / PlayStation VR
Offline
Posted 10/24/16
Alright, c'mon. It may have been a while for me, but the WHO didn't have to step in.
3254 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / F / Everywhere
Offline
Posted 10/24/16
But can I get money for it
37339 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Online
Posted 10/24/16 , edited 10/25/16
An outside world organization, is going to try to shove this idea down our throats. And of course, Obama and other liberals will let it happen. Sure, United Nations, tell America how to run it's country. Obama has done more to surrender more of our national independence than anyone before him, and Hillary is really gonna push hard for it.
11702 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M
Offline
Posted 10/24/16
3137 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / In a Yaoi Fanfic
Online
Posted 10/24/16
People really shouldn't go around changing definitions without a consensus from the world first.

I mean let's just change the definition of harassment to include people disagreeing with you, I'm sure the world wouldn't mind.
13 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F
Offline
Posted 10/24/16
That's really stupid
Posted 10/24/16
Silly humans
35090 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
37 / F / Seireitei, Soul S...
Online
Posted 10/25/16
I get the reason why they're doing it, to make IVF procedures more equally available to everyone who might want to have the procedure done, but I'm not sure if I agree with the way they're going about doing it. Being single isn't a disability. I'm sure they could have found another definition or something for it to make it more equal.
22126 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / F
Offline
Posted 10/25/16 , edited 10/25/16

I get the reason why they're doing it, to make IVF procedures more equally available to everyone who might want to have the procedure done, but I'm not sure if I agree with the way they're going about doing it. Being single isn't a disability. I'm sure they could have found another definition or something for it to make it more equal.


Agreed, WHO tends to worry more about the way their definitions function to make treatments more accessible rather than worry about the average reader's reaction to it. They can be really great for a lot of different things, but I worry of them losing too much credibility in peoples' eyes for stuff like this. This is the biggest stretch I've ever seen them pull by far.
2792 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 10/25/16 , edited 10/25/16
If this is to "have the right to have a family", does this mean I also have the right to a husband/wife? Can I get one assigned to me? Not that I want one.

Maybe if they're rich and give me all their money though.
Vahvi 
3035 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / Ever Changing
Online
Posted 10/25/16 , edited 10/25/16
*boop boop boop*

Yeah, hey boss. Doc says i'm sick; says i'm gonna have to take tomorrow off.
Tay01 
27230 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 10/25/16 , edited 10/25/16
The title of the article is a tad misleading, it is basically saying that not being in a relationship prevents you from producing progeny in the same way that infertility does, and thus to enforce equality people who physically can't produce progeny should extend their rights to people who can't do to social reasons. What the article suggests doing is classifying people who are socially unable along side people who physically under the same disability category . Honestly it just seems simpler to just give equal priority, rather than change classifications.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.