First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
Post Reply Donald Trump - "Grab Her By The Pussy" Triggers LGBT community
245 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / PlayStation VR
Offline
Posted 11/1/16
Most dudes I've known that talk like this, especially using past tense as if discussing conquests, tend to be douche nuggets. Beyond that, the issue is that this is a man running for President, not the dude you hang out with in gym. People are going to hold him to a higher standard and pretty much drag every skeleton from his closet.


AnimeAddictANN69 wrote:


runec wrote:

Oddly enough, you can be a straight male and not a complete pig.

Shocking, I know.


SHOCKING!!!

this can't be right.. all men are pigs..we all know that... i got statistics to prove it

here's one

5 out of 5 men are pigs/rapists/sexists etc..







Yeah, but do all five still recommend Trident gum?
5276 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 11/3/16
Bragging about sexual assault is not acceptable, from a presidental candidate.
2370 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / NY
Offline
Posted 11/3/16 , edited 11/3/16

Deyre wrote:

Thats sort of double standards. Ever been in a furry NSFW chat room. Yeah... it gets pretty messy


Why in the world do you use such a specifically niche example fewer people understand to make a point, when literally NSFW is by definition messy? lol
18690 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F
Offline
Posted 11/3/16

TRKitsune wrote:


Deyre wrote:

Thats sort of double standards. Ever been in a furry NSFW chat room. Yeah... it gets pretty messy


Why in the world do you use such a specifically niche example fewer people understand to make a point, when literally NSFW is by definition messy? lol


why in the world does he have to talk about furries all the time

is dere dere secretly a furry and doesn't want to admit it?
20621 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Alpha Qudrant Sec...
Offline
Posted 11/3/16
There two types of talk in that video, one was actual "locker room talk" and the other was rich privileged talk

"i tried to move on her and I was rejected" - that IS locker room talk
"I can grab women and that let me because I'm a star" that is assault talk and what athletes believe when they rape people "oh I'm da man she totally wanted it"
Posted 11/3/16

ninjitsuko wrote:

"I gotta use some tic tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful... (pause) I just start kissing them, it's like a magnet. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything, whatever you want. Grab them by the ...."

I don't think there's any misinterpretation here unless you're trolling. Basically, indicates that he starts kissing women randomly that he finds attractive and will grab them by the ... without consent. Pretty straight-forward logic, without any paraphrasing of what he's said in the clip.


Thanks for the SJW interpretation that we dint get from ANY of the mainstream media outlets or feminists.

Nobody has an appreciation for shit talking, I love how nobody has ever experienced someone else saying outlandish things and one upping those outlandish things, and everyone having a good laugh about it, because it was a joke after all. I mean cmon its not like Trump ever had any dealings with the entertainment business, RIGHT?

Talk about dog whistle...
Gets It.
24670 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / Raleigh, North Ca...
Online
Posted 11/3/16 , edited 11/3/16

RaisedInACult wrote:

Thanks for the SJW interpretation that we dint get from ANY of the mainstream media outlets or feminists.

Nobody has an appreciation for shit talking, I love how nobody has ever experienced someone else saying outlandish things and one upping those outlandish things, and everyone having a good laugh about it, because it was a joke after all. I mean cmon its not like Trump ever had any dealings with the entertainment business, RIGHT?

Talk about dog whistle...


First off, not a so-called "Social Justice Warrior" regardless of what you'd like to think.
Secondly, I've never really dealt with similar kinds of shit-talking like what's taken in the context of what was shown on the clip that was shown of Trump (stated in this particular video/article).

"Because it was a joke after all.. I mean. c'mon, it's not like Trump ever had any dealing with the entertainment business, RIGHT?

I would have taken it as a joke if it was taken from a known "hot mic". In this instance, Trump had no clue was being recorded and was being candid. Thanks for the interpretation from a seemingly Trump supporting individual who only classifies those who disagrees with his liberal/globalist opinion as a "SJW".

Posted 11/3/16
Did I actually call you a SJW?

Do they still teach reading comprehension in school these days?

And another logical fallacy of because it was candid that means you know precisely what his intent was and it wasnt a joke?



Critical thinking. Try it sometime.
17 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 11/3/16

I think most guys I know talk like that in private Guess we are all supposed to pretend we are shocked to learn that this is the case to score points with the I'm holier than thou crowd.


Hell, I know at least a dozen women who talk dirtier than that on a regular basis
Gets It.
24670 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / Raleigh, North Ca...
Online
Posted 11/3/16

RaisedInACult wrote:

Did I actually call you a SJW?

Do they still teach reading comprehension in school these days?

And another logical fallacy of because it was candid that means you know precisely what his intent was and it wasnt a joke?



Critical thinking. Try it sometime.


Indirectly, as you were attempting to assume that my own interpretation is inline with what you consider the "Social Justice Warrior interpretation". No offense was taken, just correcting you because it was my own interpretation of what was said - not so much what was reported on some pseudo-news network (because I avoid it like the plague).

Perhaps you should take another reading comprehension course to follow-up, I'm not that much younger than you (assuming that your profile age is correct, at least). As for the "logical fallacy", I was debunking your own snark about him having been in the "entertainment business". Which, in effect, would have been debunking your own self-proclaimed fallacy, no? I was simply stating that trying to correlate his statement as a "joke" because he's been in the entertainment business (your own tongue-in-cheek statement/reference).

Ultimately, neither of us are reading one another clearly because of our own bias. You're biased against anyone that speaks out against you and I'm having a hard time taking most of your comments seriously because they lack anything but snark (rather than attempting to educate anyone on your beliefs or views, you simply become dismissive of those who challenge you). But I'm willing to admit that there's a "reading comprehension" complication here, but it's not due to lack of skill - just lack of desire (on both of our parts).
Posted 11/3/16
Or, you can be honest and admit you inferred that. *shrug*

Your second paragraph is a writing atrocity, your grade school teacher should come visit you with the yardstick for it.

I'm really only dismissive of the hil bots that simply refuse to believe she's a criminal despite 40 years and mountains of evidence
Sogno- 
45682 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 11/3/16 , edited 11/3/16
what doesn't "trigger" those people honestly lolol
Gets It.
24670 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / Raleigh, North Ca...
Online
Posted 11/3/16

RaisedInACult wrote:

Or, you can be honest and admit you inferred that. *shrug*

Your second paragraph is a writing atrocity, your grade school teacher should come visit you with the yardstick for it.

I'm really only dismissive of the hil bots that simply refuse to believe she's a criminal despite 40 years and mountains of evidence


Actually, my second paragraph was proper, both in punctuation and grammar. Just because there was parenthesis around a follow-up thought to the sentence doesn't make it a run-on, nor would it make it incorrect. Though, it's a forum - you're allowed some grammatic errors from time to time (let us not even discuss some of your sentence structure; as it's really a moot point when you're online in this day and age).

Yes, I inferred that you had made a comment that was tongue-in-cheek and called you out on it with a similarly snarky comment. You and I both keep bouncing back and forth, but we're essentially "agreeing to disagree" on certain things.

Regarding "Hilbots", I'm not for Clinton. However, I'm just more against Trump, due to disagreeing with him on several key social issues and his economic plan that doesn't make much sense, on a mathematical level. I agree that Clinton has her fair share of scandals (both confirmed and theorized) that would make her unfit to be in the position of "Commander-in-Chief/President". At the same time, I don't think either Trump nor Clinton have enough merit to be in that position for multiple reasons.

While I agree with you on certain things, I would have to disagree that Trump has any more merit to stand on when compared to Clinton. They've both committed crimes, both have lied, and both just mud-sling (direct and indirect) insults at one another. It's more of a circus than a presidential election.

As for those who are the "globalist theorists" (like yourself, from my perception), many of those whom I've spoken to with similar mentalities as your own have claimed that Trump is simply a plant to ensure that Clinton wins the election (and that the e-mails are to discredit the process and cause chaos in America to distract us from the "greater plan" for the globalist society that's governing our world behind the shades). Of course, these are the same types that link INFOWARS, Information Liberation, and Propaganda Matrix articles when proving their theory/line of thought. Any thoughts about that? Or are you merely at the tip of that particular spectrum of critical thinking in regard to this election?
97968 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
68 / M / Columbia, MO
Offline
Posted 11/3/16
Back in the early '70's I was a driver-mover-packer trainee stationed for a few weeks in Indianapolis, IN learning the HHG (household goods hauling) trade. During this period of time the school allowed an hour at midday for a lunch break. Since we were for-hire contractors this meant meeting the lunch wagon and paying for the items out of our own pocket. No big deal....what's unusual about that?

One of the old hands in the trade picked up a 17-year old girl somewhere in North Carolina and kept her onboard his rig as a house frau. Apparently the 35 year gap in ages didn't seem to offend either him or her. She got to see the country, he got some tail. I guess it was a wonderful relationship for a few months until suddenly, this old boy's wife wanted to accompany him on some of these mover trips and she did not know about his "adopted" girl friend old enough to be a daughter. Long story short: "Queenie" was left at the Indianapolis terminal to fend for herself, ply her trade, meet new johns since "Daddy" had other familial obligations on board.

Her favorite technique was to come up behind 1 of the new drivers during 1 of these mobile lunch wagon breaks when these guys were chatting amongst themselves holding their portable lunches, stand very close, ease out a friendly Southern-drawl greeting like "How's it hangin'?" in unison with using 1 of her arms to reach down between his legs and grab him by the nuts. Eight times out of 10 the "victim" usually dropped his hot styrofoam cup of coffee; quite laughable, actually.

The suits at the terminal threw her out account illegal prostitution. Although Queenie was short a brick or two intellectually she made friends easily with some of the gal pals down the street so all went well for the time needed before "Daddy" would return sans wife for the wintertime runs solo. In reality he never got to haul her around on his rig again. She quickly learned she could make more money doing tricks up the street so she stayed put.

After awhile all the drivers knew her so she wasn't nearly as successful as months' past using the long arm technique to greet new prospects during lunch. However, the lack of couth didn't stop her from starting conversation with some of the driver's wives. Usually it went like this: "How much are you charging?"

Those were the days........

1828 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Australia
Offline
Posted 11/3/16

Sogno- wrote:

what doesn't "trigger" those people honestly lolol


First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.