Post Reply militia group prepares for trouble as election draws near
18688 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F
Online
Posted 11/2/16 , edited 11/2/16
37315 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 11/2/16 , edited 11/2/16
The militias exist. I wonder the number of militias will go up from 279 to several thousand if Clinton wins?

A lot of people are angry at a government that is draining America's potential, and waisting it on quagmire wars, that do nothing but get us deeper and deeper in debt, and weaken us, militarily, economically, and every other *ly that there is... Some of that anger is expressing as militias....
One Punch Mod
85853 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Boston-ish
Offline
Posted 11/3/16


I think I've mentioned this before, but I'm going to mention it again. Please do more to get discussion started than just posting a link to a news article. Sometimes others' reactions do get things going anyway, but you shouldn't rely on that. Please at least let us know why you chose to share a link. What did you find especially interesting? What are your thoughts about that particular piece of news or opinions expressed in it?
18688 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F
Online
Posted 11/3/16

lorreen wrote:



I think I've mentioned this before, but I'm going to mention it again. Please do more to get discussion started than just posting a link to a news article. Sometimes others' reactions do get things going anyway, but you shouldn't rely on that. Please at least let us know why you chose to share a link. What did you find especially interesting? What are your thoughts about that particular piece of news or opinions expressed in it?


I have stopped doing that due to being attacked in the past by different users, causing an argument. so I leave my opinion out
15259 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / UK
Offline
Posted 11/3/16

redokami wrote:


lorreen wrote:



I think I've mentioned this before, but I'm going to mention it again. Please do more to get discussion started than just posting a link to a news article. Sometimes others' reactions do get things going anyway, but you shouldn't rely on that. Please at least let us know why you chose to share a link. What did you find especially interesting? What are your thoughts about that particular piece of news or opinions expressed in it?


I have stopped doing that due to being attacked in the past by different users, causing an argument. so I leave my opinion out


I think the phrases you're looking for are "disagreed with" and "expressed their viewpoints".


Onto topic:

Nothing but hot air and overzealous rhetoric from a bunch of morons, who seem to have an deranged view of reality. Apart from complaining on social media, and engaging in some chest beating, they won't actually do anything.
Posted 11/3/16
got trouble taking MSM globalist mouthpiece news articles seriously
Gets It.
24670 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / Raleigh, North Ca...
Online
Posted 11/3/16

RaisedInACult wrote:

got trouble taking MSM globalist mouthpiece news articles seriously


How about from the horse's mouth? http://www.iiisecurityforce.com/home.html
Or the crowdsourced Wikipedia? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_Percenters

I got trouble taking people seriously when all they contribute is that "xyz is a globalist conspiracy corporation with zero merit" when there's at least some truth in the article, even if it's just a pinch of salt.

Posted 11/3/16 , edited 11/3/16
yah, just go ahead and infer whatever you wish onto what my words were. did I doubt the existence of militia concern? no. did I point out the biased presentation from globalist mouthpieces that are proven to be just that, follow the money as always, yup


it helps too if you dont try putting words in my mouth, unless there's some sort of sarcasm attached.
Gets It.
24670 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / Raleigh, North Ca...
Online
Posted 11/3/16

RaisedInACult wrote:
it helps too if you dont try putting words in my mouth, unless there's some sort of sarcasm attached.


There was quite a bit of snark and sarcasm in my response. It's mostly that there wasn't much content other than "I have trouble with taking the article seriously." It was my own problem in having an expectation of actual conversation on such "serious" topics like these. (note the quotations and italics)
41284 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 11/3/16

Voc666IV wrote:


redokami wrote:


lorreen wrote:



I think I've mentioned this before, but I'm going to mention it again. Please do more to get discussion started than just posting a link to a news article. Sometimes others' reactions do get things going anyway, but you shouldn't rely on that. Please at least let us know why you chose to share a link. What did you find especially interesting? What are your thoughts about that particular piece of news or opinions expressed in it?


I have stopped doing that due to being attacked in the past by different users, causing an argument. so I leave my opinion out


I think the phrases you're looking for are "disagreed with" and "expressed their viewpoints".


Onto topic:

Nothing but hot air and overzealous rhetoric from a bunch of morons, who seem to have an deranged view of reality. Apart from complaining on social media, and engaging in some chest beating, they won't actually do anything.


lol'd
952 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 11/3/16
If they aren't going to fire the first shot, what are they gunna do? Protest that leads to nowhere?
18688 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F
Online
Posted 11/3/16 , edited 11/3/16

Voc666IV wrote:


redokami wrote:


lorreen wrote:



I think I've mentioned this before, but I'm going to mention it again. Please do more to get discussion started than just posting a link to a news article. Sometimes others' reactions do get things going anyway, but you shouldn't rely on that. Please at least let us know why you chose to share a link. What did you find especially interesting? What are your thoughts about that particular piece of news or opinions expressed in it?


I have stopped doing that due to being attacked in the past by different users, causing an argument. so I leave my opinion out


I think the phrases you're looking for are "disagreed with" and "expressed their viewpoints".


Onto topic:

Nothing but hot air and overzealous rhetoric from a bunch of morons, who seem to have an deranged view of reality. Apart from complaining on social media, and engaging in some chest beating, they won't actually do anything.


if being called a racist over saying blood is gross and other crap is "expressing a viewpoint" then sure ok
35884 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / Georgia, USA
Offline
Posted 11/3/16 , edited 11/3/16

Militia groups in the US are probably made up of like 90% FBI/ATF agents
Just wish they'd do that with mosques


Dear_1nsanity wrote:

If they aren't going to fire the first shot, what are they gunna do? Protest that leads to nowhere?



Peaceful armed protests get more done than being a violent looter.
Posted 11/3/16

Amyas_Leigh wrote:


Militia groups in the US are probably made up of like 90% FBI/ATF agents
Just wish they'd do that with mosques


Dear_1nsanity wrote:

If they aren't going to fire the first shot, what are they gunna do? Protest that leads to nowhere?



Peaceful armed protests get more done than being a violent looter.


doesnt fit the narrative

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0hD7IffTJs
15259 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / UK
Offline
Posted 11/4/16 , edited 11/4/16

redokami wrote:


Voc666IV wrote:


redokami wrote:


lorreen wrote:



I think I've mentioned this before, but I'm going to mention it again. Please do more to get discussion started than just posting a link to a news article. Sometimes others' reactions do get things going anyway, but you shouldn't rely on that. Please at least let us know why you chose to share a link. What did you find especially interesting? What are your thoughts about that particular piece of news or opinions expressed in it?


I have stopped doing that due to being attacked in the past by different users, causing an argument. so I leave my opinion out


I think the phrases you're looking for are "disagreed with" and "expressed their viewpoints".


Onto topic:

Nothing but hot air and overzealous rhetoric from a bunch of morons, who seem to have an deranged view of reality. Apart from complaining on social media, and engaging in some chest beating, they won't actually do anything.


if being called a racist over saying blood is gross and other crap is "expressing a viewpoint" then sure ok



Well, technically, they are "expressing a viewpoint", never commented on the quality of the point. If their point is baseless you have little reason to worry; simply say that their point is groundless and move on. This is after all, an internet forum.

Or to put it a more dramatic manner:

"A lion doesn't concern itself with the opinion of sheep"


You must be logged in to post.