First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
Post Reply I don't believe what I just heard on MSNBC
VeggyZ 
2624 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M / North Dakota
Offline
Posted 11/4/16 , edited 11/4/16
Get this - and I quote...

"Hillary Clinton and Obama have been found to be the most trustworthy and transparent politicians ever" - she said this in response to a question about - you guessed it, Hillary's private stance vs. her public stance. It's a question about her admitted lying to the public, and that's their response???

...yeah, if the only thing you're ever exposed to is MSNBC (and you don't pay much attention to anything) maybe that would be believable. I seriously cannot believe their teleprompter told them to say THAT, of all things. Even if you somehow ignore all of the evidence against them and how they've overstepped their bounds and negated the constitution, Hillary said herself that she has a story she tells to the public, and a story she tells to her private interests. That's what SHE said. That is by definition the opposite of "transparency"

I really am in disbelief, it's absolutely absurd that all of our country's news networks are lying to this extent - I feel really bad for people who don't have any alternative news sources because they're being treated like bigger morons than ever, I guess they must know people aren't paying attention to what they say anymore because this is the DUMBEST thing I've ever heard on the news. Ever.

It's okay though, if their internet censorship bullshit passes, we'll be none the wiser because we won't be able to see what the rest of the world says. This is honestly TERRIFYING.
24265 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M
Offline
Posted 11/4/16
MSNBC has always been unabashedly liberal-leaning though. What are they gonna do, trash her? They want her to win. So they'll speak in hyperbole and tell the occasional boldface lie.
VeggyZ 
2624 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M / North Dakota
Offline
Posted 11/4/16
Yeah, it's too bad the other networks are the exact same way.

It's just that, sometimes a lie is so obvious that it helps the other side... this is one of those.
410 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / Finland
Offline
Posted 11/4/16
Obama sure but I don't belive that hillary is trustworthy at all.
runec 
28280 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 11/4/16
Well, I mean its partially right. She is the most transparent politician in US history. It just wasn't exactly by choice is all.
22653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 11/4/16

runec wrote:

Well, I mean its partially right. She is the most transparent politician in US history. It just wasn't exactly by choice is all.




Certainly one way to put it.

Posted 11/4/16

MysticGon wrote:

MSNBC has always been unabashedly liberal-leaning though. What are they gonna do, trash her? They want her to win. So they'll speak in hyperbole and tell the occasional boldface lie.


Follow the money and ownership













http://www.freepress.net/ownership/chart



Any of the above entities can be considered "compromised"
69 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 11/4/16
Compromised by what?
Posted 11/4/16
A common and relatively small group of owners that have an agenda.

Or do you think that its a good idea to have the news talking up how good it is to accept a flood of a million refugees into your country, and how its your duty to do this....or helping whitewash the crimes of the oligarchy by openly saying exactly the opposite of what the truth is...
69 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 11/4/16 , edited 11/4/16
>A common and relatively small group of owners that have an agenda.

This is pretty vague. So much mystery that I am now intrigued.

>Or do you think that its a good idea to have the news talking up how good it is to accept a flood of a million refugees into your country, and how its your duty to do this....or helping whitewash the crimes of the oligarchy by openly saying exactly the opposite of what the truth is...

No... yes.. maybe!?!?

You forgot to put crunchyroll/elation on that infograph.

Elation is backed by at&t, and the chernin group. The Chernin Group has money, and they use their money by feeding democrats at dinner parties.

At dinner parties! They probably sacrificed a cherducken to appease Obama-lord!

I watch crucnyhroll, and my anime dollars help fund this. Am I conspiracy? Are we conspiracy NOW?
3253 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / In a Yaoi Fanfic
Online
Posted 11/4/16
I don't believe anything on the news related to politics, ever.
13139 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M
Offline
Posted 11/4/16
Who is "she"?
Posted 11/4/16

Instant_Ramen_ wrote:

>A common and relatively small group of owners that have an agenda.

This is pretty vague. So much mystery that I am now intrigued.

>Or do you think that its a good idea to have the news talking up how good it is to accept a flood of a million refugees into your country, and how its your duty to do this....or helping whitewash the crimes of the oligarchy by openly saying exactly the opposite of what the truth is...

No... yes.. maybe!?!?

You forgot to put crunchyroll/elation on that infograph.

Elation is backed by at&t, and the chernin group. The Chernin Group has money, and they use their money by feeding democrats at dinner parties.

At dinner parties! They probably sacrificed a cherducken to appease Obama-lord!

I watch crucnyhroll, and my anime dollars help fund this. Am I conspiracy? Are we conspiracy NOW?


Entertaining usage of logical fallacies

Like I said, follow the money. If you only rely on my words and just that as the totality of information on this, sorry I cant be all that for you. You dont appear to understand how a large corporation works.
69 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 11/4/16
>Like I said, follow the money. If you only rely on my words and just that as the totality of information on this, sorry I cant be all that for you.

Follow the money to what? You didn't really explain what we're looking for here.

>You dont appear to understand how a large corporation works.

Get a load of this guy. Can you take a moment of your time to explain to me the mysteries of large corporation? Maybe some of us would like to be large corporations on this blessed day.


The burden of proof (anus prolapsey) was on you... Is there a reason why you're attempting to shift the burden on to me?

69 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 11/4/16

sundin13 wrote:

Who is "she"?


Hilary Clinton. I believe that she might be running for "Chief of Security" on Starfleet's Deep Space 9, or something.

First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.