First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
Post Reply FBI says Clinton should not face criminal charges
33369 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / Socal
Offline
Posted 11/6/16

AnimeAddictANN69 wrote:

CNN- Clinton News Network said so .. so it must be true

i thought of the it but didn't think there was someone else who will say it on live tv

Hopkins calls CNN the Clinton News Network, anchor loses it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRpTc_tKZhE


holy crap I just watched that, I love that woman, Hopkins. I love peeps that call out CNN on their fucking bullshit.
37377 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 11/6/16

sinoakayumi wrote:


DengekiFugu wrote:

Confidential State Department emails were found on a computer used by sex pervert Anthony Weiner who has no security clearance. How can that be okay? America is beginning to look a lot like the old Soviet Union.


How dare you insult the product of Capitalism! The U.S.S.R. arise from the purest Capitalist society, win in the Capitalist competition by the Capitalist rule, make effective use of limited resource to be competitive with resource-rich U.S., create order in times of chaos, and create a breeding ground for moderate Democratic Second-generation Communists! You should not criticize successful people to discourage empowerment!
And not to mention that the mainstream Republicans are criticizing the American political system when they should change themselves instead of the flawless system from the invisible hand!


I read that with a Russian accent. It was perfect!
37377 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 11/6/16

DengekiFugu wrote:

Confidential State Department emails were found on a computer used by sex pervert Anthony Weiner who has no security clearance. How can that be okay? America is beginning to look a lot like the old Soviet Union.


Exactly what I was thinking! The mere fact that confidential emails were on that/those devices should have meant something! Well, in this case, it would mean that Huma is guilty of mishandling emails. But if they won't charge Hillary, then why would they charge Huma?
runec 
28280 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 11/6/16

pandrasb wrote:
holy crap I just watched that, I love that woman, Hopkins. I love peeps that call out CNN on their fucking bullshit.


Hopkins is Ann Coulter with an accent. So, trolls of a feather I guess.
qwueri 
16462 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 29 days ago
So with nothing new found in Wiener's e-mails we're back to default Clinton e-mail outrage.
Posted 29 days ago

runec wrote:

It was only the DNC's emails that were hacked. There's no evidence of any successful hack against Clinton's. Withholding for leverage is also not Russia's MO. Their tactics are still pretty rooted in good ol' fashion Soviet era KGB shit. Just with more media at their disposal. Shape perception and disrupt reasonable discourse until everyone is just screaming at each other and people lose faith in the system.

It worked with Ukraine and its working again with the US. Its one part pushing specific positions ( while posing as Americans on Facebook, Twitter, forums, etc ) and one part just causing chaos ( troll farming ). One of the key ways they did it in Ukraine ( and now in the US ) is to actually provide too much information that is beyond the scope of what the average person will be able to reasonable dig into and understand. The accuracy of the information doesn't matter. Its the volume that's important.

The emails are the prime example. Its so much information that no one is going to realistically comb through all of them. They're going to rely on the summaries of other people ( recall all the fake facebook accounts, twitter accounts, forum posts, comments, etc ) and prefer the summaries that already fit their preconceived bias ( Which Facebook happily provides ). 99.9% of the people screaming about the Wikileaks emails have never read through them and if they tried a new batch would overwhelm them a week later anyway.

If you make the issue too complex or voluminous to easily understand it becomes quite a bit easier to push desired opinions on said issue. Or sow discord between differing sides by trolling the shit out of any discussion about the issue. In order to undermine faith in the system in general. As is *painfully* evident in this election cycle.

You could pick any other thread on this forum and watch it play out in real time. Statistically speaking there's likely at least one paid Russian troll here. -.-
You'll just believe ANYTHING that comes out of the clinton camp, wont you?

Information to access the clinton's servers was provided - that's why there was no "hack'....can you say hey someone broke in my front door, when you left the fkn door OPEN?

Same with DNC - no hack....unless you are conflating hack and leak in your head.

Still on about the Russian thing, huh....yeah, dont forget to examine Nuland's relationship to the Clintons and then put that in context with the illegal coup of the Ukranian government by US backed forces in early 2014.

They killed offices of government people. I remember seeing the pictures of the dead pregnant woman bent over the desk in that office. But of course, what news outlets were interested in letting people see the atrocities that the neo nazi mercenaries committed? And of course the news did not put up the video clips of american forces there either, whether they were blackwater contractors or whatever, I dont know, but they were there peppered amongst the coup.

Yeah, I know you were insinuating I am somehow a paid russian troll. But like most other information, it has to fit through your MSM curation filter in order to be accepted.

I'm just a dude that's pissed about what has been done in the name of me and my country. I'm just a dude that pays attention to a lot more than what the USA mainstream corporate owned press has to say.

There's zero evidence of russian hacking, but that doenst mean the russians did not access her servers and download information.


MopZ wrote:

The emails turned out to be duplicates of what they already had, and they FBI is finding that both sides have politicians that used private email servers and are now being investigated because of it. But, as long as it is "Clinton" plus anything: it's an immediate scandal.

GTG, back to the land of "how do you turn on the DVD player" and "I'll never update the anti-virus software, because it'll get a virus"...

Yeah, 30,000....and then 650,000 are found, oh, they're just all duplicates...

*facepalm*
1546 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 29 days ago

pandrasb wrote:


AnimeAddictANN69 wrote:

CNN- Clinton News Network said so .. so it must be true

i thought of the it but didn't think there was someone else who will say it on live tv

Hopkins calls CNN the Clinton News Network, anchor loses it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRpTc_tKZhE


holy crap I just watched that, I love that woman, Hopkins. I love peeps that call out CNN on their fucking bullshit.



she reminded me of Milo the type that will say it like it is


whoever took office next year

i see some changes all thanks to this presidential election


1- more and more people don't trust these mainstream media or social network sites

2- people are seeing how corrupt the government is in this country..there's is such a thing as above the law ..


if the political mob boss is in the white house..

prepare for the clash of cultures and beliefs
14763 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 29 days ago

RaisedInACult wrote:
You'll just believe ANYTHING that comes out of the clinton camp, wont you?


(Does anyone else find that slightly ironic given the username, never mind the content?)
First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.