First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
All Inclusive semi-meta discussion thread in an attempt to have safer discussion of Nerdom
10262 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 17 days ago

octorockandroll wrote:


HolyDrumstick wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:
There is no rights issue happening here. All of you crying about "freedom of speech" are wrong, seeing as that freedom of speech means that the government cannot censor you speaking publicly. If you honestly believe that manners being enforced in a private setting are a violation of freedom of speech you need to go to a safe space yourself, seeing as they are found on university campuses I am sure they will be able to point you to one of the classes that will give you the information you apparently lack.


It isn't about manners. It's about public institutions providing echo chambers of terrible, radical beliefs.

But, I honestly don't feel like discussing this anymore.

My smaller measures to unfuck these forums have fallen through, so I have work to do now.


Yes it is about manners. You can twist the truth all you want and use a few examples of misuse to define the entire concept all you want, the people forming informed opinions are never going to buy it. And your recently announced departure gives me the idea that you are aware of this as well.

Good riddance.


Oh, I'm not leaving. I'm not even going to stop talking on the forums. But, I'm also not going to waste my breath on you. I've got work to do.
4566 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 17 days ago , edited 17 days ago
[
]

Yet another person who rants about how others must listen to the words of others at all times no matter how rude or hurtful they may be, but refuses to liaten to anyone who disagrees with him

Gee, I wonder why I don't buy into your proselytizing.
10262 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 17 days ago

KennethKenstar wrote:

Also you have the crowd that thinks universities indoctrinate people. Typically, they also have never been to a university either.


Been to multiple colleges. They do indoctrinate.

Had a black feminist Sociology professor. That was a goddamned nightmare.

Had a feminist Lit professor. That was a goddamned nightmare.

And I'm not saying that simply because I disagree with their opinions. I'm a Christian, and I had two atheist biology teachers (one was actually Zoology), and I had no issue with learning about evolution and all that. Then, I go into an Environmental Science course and I get force fed heavily communistic principles, and actually get told I can no longer explain my stance because I was offending people who didn't want to be told that companies didn't purposefully dump oil into oceans, and that loggers needed to have a balance between making a profit and cutting in a less damaging manner.

Long story short.... Yeah, professors are allowed to teach basically whatever the fuck they want, even if it is more propaganda than education.

Given, I also had a few really awesome professors, including my atheist Bio professors.
5318 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 17 days ago

JRPGNATION wrote:

Huh more PC bullshit. This is the safe reason humanity has not been able to go to other planets.



The point of this thread was very much in part, to point out how ridiculous PC BS threads are after a similarly titled PC thread was allowed to exist seemingly outside of conventional CR rules.
10262 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 17 days ago

octorockandroll wrote:
Yet another person who rants about how others must listen to the words of others at all times no matter how rude or hurtful they may be, but refuses to liaten to anyone who disagrees with him

Gee, I wonder why I don't buy into your proselytizing.


I don't mind listening. In fact, I have read the things you've written.

But, I don't agree, and you probably never will. If I thought you were going to listen, I'd continue speaking. You're welcome to continuing saying whatever you want, and I'll probably read it. BUT, I don't really want to keep wasting time with someone who is 100% convinced they are right.

Given, you are right about what safe spaces are supposed to be, but that doesn't make them justifiable, reasonable, helpful, or productive. AND, that's not even what they actually are. Which is what I've been trying to express.

So, no. It isn't that I'm not willing to listen. It isn't that I don't think you're correct about a few minor details. It's that you clearly aren't going to hear anyone else out, and I'm tired of typing.

But carry on, because I'll probably continue to read the stuff you post.

Cheers.
5318 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 17 days ago

kinga750 wrote:

Where exactly is any of this stuff actually happening in real life? I think I'm just going to ignore all of it, because I have no idea what the fuck you guys are on about.


I made a thread to point out how ridiculous this PC stuff is and usurp a similarly titled thread that was allowed to exist outside conventional CR rules due to mod preference on the subject. The mod had been removing comments seemingly based on personal bias and just playing fast and loose with the rules as a whole. So this thread was created both for the above purpose but also to expressly allow for these bs pc conversations to take place without the anti-pc opinions being wrongly deleted.
Banned
1408 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Virginia, USA
Offline
Posted 17 days ago

HolyDrumstick wrote:

Then, I go into an Environmental Science course and I get force fed heavily communistic principles,


4566 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 17 days ago , edited 17 days ago

HolyDrumstick wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:
Yet another person who rants about how others must listen to the words of others at all times no matter how rude or hurtful they may be, but refuses to liaten to anyone who disagrees with him

Gee, I wonder why I don't buy into your proselytizing.


Given, you are right about what safe spaces are supposed to be, but that doesn't make them justifiable, reasonable, helpful, or productive. AND, that's not even what they actually are. Which is what I've been trying to express.


So if I am not mistaken you are still choosing to judge an entire concept by a small number of misuses. If thats the case then you clearly are lying about the part where you say you have been listening to me.
Banned
1408 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Virginia, USA
Offline
Posted 17 days ago

octorockandroll wrote:


HolyDrumstick wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:
Yet another person who rants about how others must listen to the words of others at all times no matter how rude or hurtful they may be, but refuses to liaten to anyone who disagrees with him

Gee, I wonder why I don't buy into your proselytizing.


Given, you are right about what safe spaces are supposed to be, but that doesn't make them justifiable, reasonable, helpful, or productive. AND, that's not even what they actually are. Which is what I've been trying to express.


So if I am not mistaken you are still choosing to judge an entire concept by a small number of misuses. If thats the case then you clearly are lying about the part where you say you have been listening to me.


It's what happens when you raise your children on South Park.
10262 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 17 days ago

KennethKenstar wrote:


HolyDrumstick wrote:

Then, I go into an Environmental Science course and I get force fed heavily communistic principles,




Have no idea what you're trying to say here. I assume you're trying to make fun, but I actually have no idea what you're getting at.

None.

Maybe try words?
4566 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 17 days ago

KennethKenstar wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:

So if I am not mistaken you are still choosing to judge an entire concept by a small number of misuses. If thats the case then you clearly are lying about the part where you say you have been listening to me.


It's what happens when you raise your children on South Park.


...huh?
10262 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 17 days ago

KennethKenstar wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:


HolyDrumstick wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:
Yet another person who rants about how others must listen to the words of others at all times no matter how rude or hurtful they may be, but refuses to liaten to anyone who disagrees with him

Gee, I wonder why I don't buy into your proselytizing.


Given, you are right about what safe spaces are supposed to be, but that doesn't make them justifiable, reasonable, helpful, or productive. AND, that's not even what they actually are. Which is what I've been trying to express.


So if I am not mistaken you are still choosing to judge an entire concept by a small number of misuses. If thats the case then you clearly are lying about the part where you say you have been listening to me.


It's what happens when you raise your children on South Park.


You make a lot of assumptions. It's funny.

I'm older than you, for one.

But, you seem like one of the typical SJW strategy users: Can't debate? Insult!
14729 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Online
Posted 17 days ago , edited 17 days ago

HolyDrumstick wrote:


KennethKenstar wrote:


Have no idea what you're trying to say here. I assume you're trying to make fun, but I actually have no idea what you're getting at.

None.

Maybe try words?


Yeah, I didn't see that episode of Seinfeld either, so I don't know what George is supposed to be saying.


AirAKose wrote:
The "allies" keyword is the inclusive part of the post that kept it from breaking any offense/exclusion rules and hinted towards its intent. It's essentially a loaded question, "What do you love most about this show?" "Which of these two swords is your favorite?" etc... If you don't like the show, or either of those swords, you're not intended to answer..


Anybody else would instinctively talk about their "friends"--Y'know, people you chat with about Stuff of the Day.

"Allies" are politically-expedient supporters who share your cause, and will fight on your side in the coming Battle. And a battle was what the poster came hoping to bring, and did, when she got to make her Help-help-I'm-being-racially/gender-repressed comments to whoever disagreed with her.

Lorreen wanted to prevent a fight, and prevented it by making sure everyone ELSE left the bar so there was no one for for the OP to fight with. That's, er, not how you stop one.


zinjashike wrote:

OP used "White Tears" unironically, could fall into tasteless commentary or joke regarding race. We could also argue that it was created as flamebait being disingenuous..


Using "I'm comin' Massa!" jokes implying that she was forced to become a white-majority-oppressed Uncle Tom by just shutting up her fights and trying to get along with who disagreed with her for the sake of civilized discourse might also be construed a tad less than genuous.

(And then Lorreen, who doesn't like seeing black feminist lesbians picked on, changed the entire group thread to "Thread deleted for being off-topic and mean", as well as banning me for essentially spinning circles around my ear with a finger and going "coo-coo, coo-coo!")


Punk_Mela wrote:


Balzack wrote:

Lorreen should be booted off the mod team for what she did today, IMO.

It's one thing to have someone create a thread that's racist, and get away with it. Whatever. Happens all the time here these days.

But having a moderator delete any dissenting replies, as well as ban people because they weren't conforming to some kind of made up, exclusivity rules is absolutely ridiculous. Hell, I'm not even 100% sure if what was done was against the law or not.


With no disrespect to Loreen (who I think is probably not such bad person), I would have to agree.

I initially made this thread out of irritation and a somewhat childish reaction to the blatant lopsided application of the rules, and while that irritation was short lived and gone. I am still irritated by the moderating trends today reflected. There is no question personal feelings have come in to play on which content was allowed and which was not. Crunchyroll runs the site and they can run the show however they wish, but I have expressed my opinions on deaf ears a few times previously and at this point, I see no reason in helping pay for their bias. Will be canceling my subscription as well.


Complaint endorsed, noted and lodged with Support.
As Balzack said in the above post...OOPS, WAIT, what happened to the original post? It must have DISAPPEARED!!

The thread-deletion was Lorreen's Saturday-Night Massacre, and now she's hiding tapes and talking to the portraits on the wall.
She's nice, but when you believe it's your holy duty to be the PC Nice Person in the room, that's how Rambos are born. And as we've seen from other threads and news stunts, Absolute SJW Power corrupts Absolutely.

She's got to go.
Banned
1408 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Virginia, USA
Offline
Posted 17 days ago

HolyDrumstick wrote:


KennethKenstar wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:


HolyDrumstick wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:
Yet another person who rants about how others must listen to the words of others at all times no matter how rude or hurtful they may be, but refuses to liaten to anyone who disagrees with him

Gee, I wonder why I don't buy into your proselytizing.


Given, you are right about what safe spaces are supposed to be, but that doesn't make them justifiable, reasonable, helpful, or productive. AND, that's not even what they actually are. Which is what I've been trying to express.


So if I am not mistaken you are still choosing to judge an entire concept by a small number of misuses. If thats the case then you clearly are lying about the part where you say you have been listening to me.


It's what happens when you raise your children on South Park.


You make a lot of assumptions. It's funny.

I'm older than you, for one.

But, you seem like one of the typical SJW strategy users: Can't debate? Insult!


Speaking of assumptions, it's a real thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Park_Republican
10262 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 17 days ago , edited 17 days ago

KennethKenstar wrote:
Speaking of assumptions, it's a real thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Park_Republican


I never said it wasn't, Dandelion. I said you were making assumptions. I also said you were tossing out insults.

Both of which seem to still be very true.

But, hey, can't we just agree that we're not going to agree?
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.