First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next  Last
Post Reply Is Globalism Going To Be Shoved Down Our Throats?
37461 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Online
Posted 21 days ago , edited 17 days ago
The globalists are still doing stuff.... What are we gonna do about it? What can we do about it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuzTjt-7Noc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9V3_ISjnUY

This is no longer a Republican Party vs Democratic Party issue. This is an issue of National sovereignty vs globalism. This is about a democratically elected government ruled via the Constitution of The United States vs The New World Order organized and run by the wealthy elite globalists from around the planet.

I didn't vote for Obama (the first time, I voted for McCain. The second time, I voted for Obama. I wanted Obama care to have a chance to work), so that he could give away America's sovereignty. I didn't agree with any such "world views" as he described in his response to the reporter, and in his speech to the U.N.

I didn't serve in the United States Marine Corps, nor swear to protect the Constitution of The United States of America, so that he could give the wealth of our country to other nations (via NAFTA (which Bill Clinton signed), TPP, and TTIP http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/21010-10-reasons-why-you-should-oppose-obamatrade), because he wanted to make globalism more attainable.

All you people who voted for Obama, did any of you know that he wanted to guide our country towards globalism, when you listened to his speeches on the campaign trail? Don't we want a better life for our own families in our own country? How can we have that if the wealthy elite use their influence to take it all from us, and give it all away so that they can build their one world government?

Liberalism used to be about eliminating poverty through government programs (welfare) in America. It used to be about protecting workers' rights and ensuring government paid health care. Now, however, I see that Liberalism has added a word to their title. Now it's Progressive Liberalism. Does that mean that Progressive Liberals want to give our national sovereignty away and make America into a region subservient to a world government?

Is this what Progressive Liberals really want?
10656 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 21 days ago , edited 16 days ago
Take up arms against your oppressors.
Vahvi 
3175 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / Ever Changing
Offline
Posted 21 days ago , edited 16 days ago

gornotck wrote:

Take up arms against your oppressors.


YEAH, TAKE UP YOUR ARMS!

Shiro Amada Style (⌐■_■)
37461 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Online
Posted 21 days ago , edited 16 days ago
Taking up arms is what George Soros wants. We need to let our laws work. Let our Constitution do its job. We must remain law abiding citizens and support the president elect, when he takes office. If not, then we will tread down the path to civil strife, sectarian violence, and maybe even civil war.
4956 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Online
Posted 21 days ago , edited 21 days ago
No but it seems like threads like these will be.
29678 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Midnight City
Offline
Posted 21 days ago , edited 21 days ago
"Shoved Down Our Throats"? Y'all nasty....
14111 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 21 days ago , edited 5 days ago

octorockandroll wrote:

No but it seems like threads like these will be.

honestly with each new one these same few topic starters sound like they've sunken deeper and deeper into their dumb conspiracy echo chamber and i can barely even tell what they're talking about anymore. but i guess when phrases like "new world order" are being used unironically it's a good indication that actually trying to parse them probably isn't worth anyone's time . . .
16857 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M / L'Étoile du Nord,...
Offline
Posted 21 days ago , edited 15 days ago
Globalism will continue to do what it does.

Dare I say this, but nobody's ready for a one-world government. I still believe every country has the right to its own individuality....including the United States of America.
17077 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
44 / M / Verginia
Offline
Posted 21 days ago , edited 18 days ago
If one were actually educate themselv's globalasium has never been a right or left issue. It is all about making the wealthy wealthier. Apple might be an American owned company but, 90% of their employees don't live in the US as all their manufacturing is done in China for slave wages. Those billionaires use scare tactics like " without this or that free trade agreement American farmers will suffer". I call bullshit. Everyone needs food and will buy it. No one will die without an iPhone.
4375 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / Rainbow Factory
Offline
Posted 21 days ago , edited 15 days ago
Why is globalism bad?

What's inherently wrong with a single world government?
17077 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
44 / M / Verginia
Offline
Posted 21 days ago

ZenZaku wrote:

Why is globalism bad?

What's inherently wrong with a single world government?


Nothing. Well as long as one forgets who benefits from a one world government. Stallan, Hitler, Cesor, bill gates, steve jobs, mark zukerburg, all advocate for a one world government ruled by themselves or those they control. Monopolies are just as bad in government for the people as they are in business for the consumer. People can always leave a state they find untenable the same way a consumer can buy someone else's products. With a one world government there will be no choice.
6663 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / USA
Offline
Posted 21 days ago , edited 16 days ago

ZenZaku wrote:

Why is globalism bad?

What's inherently wrong with a single world government?


Yeah, one world government seems like a brilliant idea. No more wars (international ones, but I will get to that in a moment), lots of free trade, and maybe some other benefits...like maybe the world's largest voting chamber being built.

But there is also the problem of who you are sharing your country with. And I don't mean this in a racist or xenophobic way, but in a way where a significant part of this hypothetical worldwide electorate would be in favor of me having to wear a hijab or face being stoned to death. And if I wasn't forced to wear a hijab or be stoned to death they would likely rise up in a violent armed revolt. How do you satisfy these people overly obsessed with that fashion while at the same time satisfying people who believe that cute cardigans are in this season? With the many different cultures on Earth getting them to agree on laws and policies would be incredibly difficult.

Well maybe we can adjust the power of this hypothetical government so it doesn't anger anyone. Me as an American hold a very different thought on what powers the government should have compared to many other people. As we are seeing with cracks in the EU, a one-size fits all government that is trying to satisfy all of these viewpoints would pretty quickly antagonize them all. For example, most Americans would balk at a government that significantly restricted freedom of religion. Likewise a lot of countries would balk at not restricting freedom of religion. And with the predilection of certain groups to rise up at the drop of a hat there would probably be a lot more warfare going on with people from all over being dragged into the fight.

Finally there is the issue of accountability. With over 7.4 billion constituents how can a group get their voices heard and grievances addressed? If we use the United Nations as a model there are 193 delegates or 1 delegate per 38,341,969 people. How effective would your voice be heard in that arrangement?

Overall, with the way the world currently is, a world government is the last thing the world needs.
15 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 21 days ago , edited 15 days ago
A one world government is the only way forward in the far future when we have met aliens on other planets and can freely go between them etc. When the world is truly unified and works towards a common goal it will likely see progress like never before

The problem with the one world government of today is that its not the people of earth agreeing on it and the method of government and deciding who will rule.

its the worlds richest people secretly giving themselves enough power to legally control the entire world.

They arent doing it for the good of the people they are only aspiring towards their own goals.

its just not for me.
18519 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Los Angeles
Offline
Posted 21 days ago

ZenZaku wrote:

Why is globalism bad?

What's inherently wrong with a single world government?


Everything. There will be no longer be different cultures or ways of life. Everything will be dictated under a one world government.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.