First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
Wikileaks no more
Posted 14 days ago , edited 14 days ago

ishe5555 wrote:

Why is it always a black armored car? Why not a white armored car, or a pepsi van? If there were some conspiracy going on, why wouldn't you use something less conspicuous than a black armored car?

Edit:
Also, if a deadman's switch went off and encrypted documents were obtained, then why would the poster not provide the encryption key or passphrase? Wouldn't that be more helpful than some cloak and dagger message about how everything has been compromised except a physical location, and that for some reason they are evidently free to move, despite having been brought in by the authorities, and are hoofing it to the location against the all odds and the governments of the world?


I dont know why it was a black armored car, but unless you're assuming the live video feed was not real.....there's not really much to dispute. black armored car it was.

why in the hell would a black armored car show up at 2am at the embassy? especially on the day following the silencing of Assange? I seriously doubt they were taking a delivery of currency at 2am.

the file and hash code were separate, they always were. the file was out there for a while before the october incident.

they release it, and concurrently the internet experiences massive DDoS attacks

to think this is all coincidence....that's way too far of a stretch to believe.
46651 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 13 days ago , edited 13 days ago



Snopes=fail. Time and again, if its anything remotely sensitive, Snopes has proven themselves to be complicit in the media lies. If the information doesnt make a crap's worth of difference to anyone, Snopes will likely be correct.....but if its "sensitive to national security" then they are right on board doing what they're told.

Fact of the matter remains, it'd be very easy for Assange to show his face from that balcony, were he able to.

The hashes released on the 14th are not the dead man hashes.

15 of the top people at Wikileaks were nailed at the same time Julian Assange had his "internet cut".

Wikileaks director Gavin McFadyen was murdered right around the time of the Assange incident
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/789987961123188736/photo/1

McFadyen was a good friend of assange and they knew each other long enough,

but "Julian" never misspelled McFadyen's name as McFayden until after the Assange incident.

oh wait that's right....McFadyen died after a brief illness of sorts, nothing to see here now move along...


http://heavy.com/news/2016/10/gavin-macfadyen-cause-of-death-how-did-the-journalist-die-wikileaks-rip/

McFayden had this little "illness" called lung cancer and many people knew he'd been battling it for a while. Do you think his family and friends that were there when he died were convinced to lie? I can't believe that you think every news source is a lie, except for reddit and 4chan. Do you see the hypocrisy in that or are you so blinded? That's a joke man, keep chasing your aliens.
Posted 12 days ago

rawratl wrote:

McFayden had this little "illness" called lung cancer and many people knew he'd been battling it for a while. Do you think his family and friends that were there when he died were convinced to lie? I can't believe that you think every news source is a lie, except for reddit and 4chan. Do you see the hypocrisy in that or are you so blinded? That's a joke man, keep chasing your aliens.


I love how in your world, everything's just a coincidence, and nothing really warrants investigating.

Go back to CNN for your next opinion download...
1017 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Somewhere Drinking
Offline
Posted 12 days ago
Yeah sure everything is a conspiracy....uh huh. whatever and jet fuel can't melt steel beams.

Posted 12 days ago
It cant. For the same reason that when you turn on a gas stove and it opens up a 3000+ degree flame and it somehow magically DOESNT melt the aluminum pan you're frying eggs in.

Its called stoichiometry, it is a branch of chemistry, it deals with moles of reactant and the outflows of the chemical reactions thereof.

All that thick black smoke that was there 20 minutes after the explosion - yeah, that's all low temp oxygen starved smoke, black like that.

There simply were not anywhere near enough BTUs of jet fuel to have significantly damaged WTC 1 or 2.

and 7's just laughably ridiculous, one is clueless if he doesnt believe that one was set up ahead of time.
Posted 12 days ago
I love how "it is understood" that he died of lung cancer

despite "he suffered from a short illness" tweet that was rather quickly removed

if the guy was such a stickler for the truth, why would he hide the fact that he had cancer?

why would his wife say he died from a short illness instead of saying "he died after a battle with cancer"

oh wait, dont ask questions, right...
46651 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 12 days ago , edited 12 days ago

RaisedInACult wrote:


rawratl wrote:

McFayden had this little "illness" called lung cancer and many people knew he'd been battling it for a while. Do you think his family and friends that were there when he died were convinced to lie? I can't believe that you think every news source is a lie, except for reddit and 4chan. Do you see the hypocrisy in that or are you so blinded? That's a joke man, keep chasing your aliens.


I love how in your world, everything's just a coincidence, and nothing really warrants investigating.

Go back to CNN for your next opinion download...


You are so full of shit, honestly. For starters, sometimes lung cancer is "a short illness." Stage 4 cancer can kill you really quickly. My stepfather didn't even last 2 months after his diagnoses, and I am not kidding when I say "a short illness" was on his obituary. Sometimes its easier to write that then talk about the cancer, it's a semantics thing. As far as your screw loose theories go, you really don't understand anything you think you do. You just gather information from random posters on reddit and god knows where. Why don't you let actually intelligent people teach you a thing or two?

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/


Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength—and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."

"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.

But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F.


Oh, but I suppose you read that and decided that popular mechanics was MSM trash? They don't know as much as you, since a friend of a friend taught you about crematory math?

Im off until the weekend, have a nice Thanksgiving!
Posted 12 days ago , edited 11 days ago



ahahahahaha nice FAIL trying to use Popular Mechanics' idiots guide to being an idiot sheep as some sort of confirmation of the completely nonphysical fairy tale that was the 911 commission report.



you believe utter CRAP like this and then you have the nerve to try an crack at what I've said?


He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F


One has to be completely ignorant of physics and chemistry to believe this.

In a high rise steel structure, where FIRE is the biggest greatest threat, EVERYTHING but the paper is made out of FIRE RETARDANT materials!!!!! Have any experience in corporate real estate? No? Didnt think so. Fact of the matter is, it is a *requirement*....but dont let that get in the way of your fantasy of having shit tons of burnables in those buildings.

Rugs, curtains, most furniture....ALL made of the most fire retardant materials they can possibly utilize. Sure there will be some wooden chairs here and there, but cmon. WOOD? Negligible.

You've got to be almost completely physics illiterate to try and use popular mechanics as any sort of debunking of 911, that's just a joke.

All of those items mentioned melt into a black goop that does not propagate fire, consuming a LOT of BTUs in the process. Or maybe you havent heard that man has invented fireproof rugs, etc? *facepalm*


And then you wonder why I tell you that you cant even sort fact from fiction, physical from nonphysical.



No shit some aggressive cancers can be short illnesses. Hiding these things does not fit the MO of the person, but facts like that dont make a shit of a difference to someone that's already had a story programmed into their head. This man was dealing with subjects where the people committing these acts are known to KILL those trying to expose it - so it really makes zero sense that if he had cancer, he'd have kept it hidden - and then if that were the cause of death, he or his wife would keep that hidden??? Otherwise the crap tons of people that read his material and follow what he's doing will automatically assume he was murdered and will try to find out why.

So it makes no sense that if he knew,....he'd just punk everyone and say ahahahaha go ahead and solve the mystery of my death, it was no mystery, it was just cancer, but I'll keep it quiet so as to keep you all guessing hahaha...

wtf sort of logic does that make?

You probably believe Brietbart's & Scalia's deaths were natural too.
29840 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F
Offline
Posted 11 days ago
4chan
52848 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
100 / M
Offline
Posted 11 days ago
We'll never know if it 100% truth or Lies. Heck Julian could be used by the highest level Government to play him as a puppet due to the public believing that he capable of finding the truth. But How does he know its the truth? It could be mixes of Truth and Lies. Or even 90% of lies and only 10% of truth.

The reason our highest level Government that President doesn't know exist do thing that may deed evil in public eye, but that may be only way to protect the America way and our lives. I know, I know I must be thinking of that smoking man from X-Files series.. The Two FBI Agents fighting against to gain the truth about the existance of Alien Life Form.. and the reason the smoking man doesn't want to bring light of the existance of alien is to protect the public from panic..

Since we don't know 99.99% going on with our Highest Government, we should leave it in their hand to do what they've been doing since the beginning of the day America was established. That is Protect the America way of lives.. Remember the movie "Swordfish"?

I'm very tired haven't slept.. I may going off the topic lol. The points is don't believe everything you read just because this Julain guy said it is the truth. we can knowledge it as a truth or lies... or just interesting stories to cover up the other truth out there.

Yes, I'm working for the Government! That How powerful I am! ;p j/k

52848 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
100 / M
Offline
Posted 11 days ago
Guys.. Ladies.. Look into my Eye! Don't Worry live with what you got... just let it go with the flow... The Truth is the World is flat!
Posted 11 days ago
when a pattern emerges and there's a himalayan mountain range of circumstantial evidence, it is silly to disregard it because oh hey that's hidden information you're not supposed to see. matter of fact, all kinds of illegal things had to happen in order to keep that information from even the government...

well yeah, not completely, because the NSA has all of the data, the government just doesnt want to know everyone how pervasive the spying is.

but dont take my word for it, take the word of the whistleblower man who created the NSA database who tried exposing it and got severely harrassed by the gov....William Binney tried getting this stuff out LONG before Snowden was even employed.
37144 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 11 days ago

RaisedInACult wrote:

when a pattern emerges and there's a himalayan mountain range of circumstantial evidence, it is silly to disregard it because oh hey that's hidden information you're not supposed to see. matter of fact, all kinds of illegal things had to happen in order to keep that information from even the government...

well yeah, not completely, because the NSA has all of the data, the government just doesnt want to know everyone how pervasive the spying is.

but dont take my word for it, take the word of the whistleblower man who created the NSA database who tried exposing it and got severely harrassed by the gov....William Binney tried getting this stuff out LONG before Snowden was even employed.


That's the problem. You are asking us to take your word for it, and backing yourself up with terrible sources or none at all. When someone presents counter evidence you won't even consider it (MSM misleading the sheep right?); but we are supposed to take every reddit, 4chan and infowars link you guys post as fucking gospel. When you get backed into a corner you change the subject, insult, and repeat the same nonsense over and over until people get tired of talking with you. Then when they stop engaging your crazy, you think you won something and feel validated.
13579 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / Australia
Offline
Posted 11 days ago , edited 11 days ago
I want to personally meet the user that posted the original 4chan post because if it's shit posting my god it is glorious shit posting. Like come on, does anyone agree with me on this?
443 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F
Offline
Posted 11 days ago , edited 11 days ago
Lala heard that Wikileaks released a consecutive encrypted messages through scrambled Bitcoin reception numbers to tell the people that they were safe. It could, however, be a fake message by the infiltrators. Lala knows how evil those people can be.

First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.