First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
Post Reply Countries cutting funding to the Clinton Foundation
28192 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5 days ago , edited 5 days ago
The server has been moved to Benghazi now has it?

Seriously, what colour is the sky in your world anyway? I know you were apparently raised in a cult and what not. So you're not exactly on good terms with reality. But you do have internet access so they must let you out of the compound from time to time. Instead of ranting on the forums maybe you should try to sneak away and see the real world.

Maybe try and make a break for a library before they catch you. Read an actual book or two before they find you and put you back in the cellar-wait, sorry, the "Vault of Purity". My bad.

>.>
Posted 5 days ago , edited 5 days ago

runec wrote:

The server has been moved to Benghazi now has it?

Seriously, what colour is the sky in your world anyway? I know you were apparently raised in a cult and what not. So you're not exactly on good terms with reality. But you do have internet access so they must let you out of the compound from time to time. Instead of ranting on the forums maybe you should try to sneak away and see the real world.

Maybe try and make a break for a library before they catch you. Read an actual book or two before they find you and put you back in the cellar-wait, sorry, the "Vault of Purity". My bad.

>.>


Oh, you didnt know that *a* Clinton Foundation server was found in Benghazi?

Well, I'm rather surprised....NOT...

Ya know, since you just deny the existence of, then dont investigate, these matters....but then somehow you're all confident that you have the answer, without having done any research.


lol more laughable comments - "The Server" - as if it was somehow just ONE and not a whole infrastructure that was set up. Oh, I'm sorry, you missed that detail too?



Ad Hom all you want, its not going to make you any less wrong.
qwueri 
16418 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 5 days ago

RaisedInACult wrote:

I love how the Hil bots show up and sing the Chorus from the Clinton song



^^Ad hominem like this?

Funny how the DoJ is supposedly owned by the Clintons, and reopens the investigation at the worst time possible for her. How the Clintons supposedly rigged the elections, and still lost in every key state they needed to clinch victory. For supposedly owning that much of the government, she utterly failed to exert much influence when it mattered.

But maybe if you wish upon a blog, one day that evidence will materialize into truth.
Posted 5 days ago
ah yes, keep the focus away from where you are substantively wrong!

just because I pointed out your ad hom, doesnt mean I denied using that, but I didnt use it as a basis for trying to refute an argument, I just toss that on as sauce after I've beaten you down in a substantive manner.
28192 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5 days ago

qwueri wrote:
But maybe if you wish upon a blog, one day that evidence will materialize into truth.


We should probably just leave him alone. He's reached the point where he's literally become a parody of himself.

He's either a dedicated troll running out of ideas or he's so far off the deep end nothing any of us say would penetrate the haze of his fever dream anyhow. Regardless, its probably best to just not make eye contact. >.>

Posted 5 days ago

runec wrote:


qwueri wrote:
But maybe if you wish upon a blog, one day that evidence will materialize into truth.


We should probably just leave him alone. He's reached the point where he's literally become a parody of himself.

He's either a dedicated troll running out of ideas or he's so far off the deep end nothing any of us say would penetrate the haze of his fever dream anyhow. Regardless, its probably best to just not make eye contact. >.>



LOL....yeah, dont actually go do any research and discover why I said what I have said!!!

A CF server was found in Benghazi, that had classified materials beyond Hillary's level of classification.

That is a FACT.

Or is it just because the owners of those 6 companies you get all of your information from have been instructed not to report on it, that you dun belief, and must follow follow follow teh programming??

Acknowledgement of that would have directly and unambiguously DISQUALIFIED her from running for prez.
qwueri 
16418 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 5 days ago

RaisedInACult wrote:

ah yes, keep the focus away from where you are substantively wrong!

just because I pointed out your ad hom, doesnt mean I denied using that, but I didnt use it as a basis for trying to refute an argument, I just toss that on as sauce after I've beaten you down in a substantive manner.


So if you use ad hominem after you've 'beaten down' in a substantive manner', when you open with ad hominem that means everything after it is non-substantive? Explains quite a bit, actually. Clearly the response to the substantive part of my posts is invisible to mere mortals, while the rest is sauce focused on the first sentence.
Posted 5 days ago
Why is the only debate tactic available to progressives......rhetorical semantics games?

Well, its ok, go pat yourself on the ass, you've got nothing else to go by.
qwueri 
16418 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 5 days ago

RaisedInACult wrote:

Why is the only debate tactic available to progressives......rhetorical semantics games?

Well, its ok, go pat yourself on the ass, you've got nothing else to go by.


Only? Pfft. It's just a more fun way of responding to preening over an imaginary victory.
Posted 5 days ago , edited 5 days ago
lol nice try.


your arguments consist of

"nuh-uh!"

and

"I dont believe what you posted, and no I'm not going to fact check it, I'll just go to CNN & NBC for my opinion on the matter"

before moving on to ad hom, strawmen, and the other logical fallacies that you use in place of a rational argument.


I've posted links in the past that did no good for you, so pardon me for not caring that you're brainwashed enough to refuse investigating these things for yourself instead of relying on the propaganda of money interests.

your arguments crumble like they are intentionally.....

qwueri 
16418 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M
Offline
Posted 5 days ago

RaisedInACult wrote:


before moving on to ad hom, strawmen, and the other logical fallacies that you use in place of a rational argument.




Why would I bother with ad hominem, strawmanning, etc when that's what your own posts have devolved into? Feel free to rant all you like, I'm done responding to something this off topic.
First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.