First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
Malta has banned gay conversion therapy
Posted 12/8/16
Two or more consenting adults should be able to rub the body parts of their choice together all they want as long as it's done in private.
1080 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 12/8/16

My view is that a gay guy could definitely function as a straight man if he put in the effort. Sexual desires are a bodily need but if a gay dude can relieve that pressure using a pillow or his hand, he can definitely relieve himself with a .........member of the opposite gender. And vice versa.

The question isn't if it's possible for gay guys to have sex with women and relieve the tension every non-asexual has, but whether they SHOULD put in that effort. At this point your view will depend on whether you think(probably due to a religion) same sex acts are immoral or not.
1080 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 12/8/16 , edited 12/8/16

Amyas_Leigh wrote:


It doesn't matter if it was a temporary thing. Making a muslim captain britain when they have muslim child grooming gangs that are pretty much sanctioned by the government is disgusting.

I could have sworn Thor was now a black woman. I must've slipped timelines again.
But seriously, the SON of Odin being a woman for PC reasons is stupid.

Well if Spiderman can be black, why not make Black Panther white? That will literally never happen even in an alternate universe.

The Captain America bullshit I'm talking about was the blatant anti Trump leftist propaganda that its become.

If that jawline and muscles doesn't give it away, you may just be blind.










Buddy, it's not like government officials don't rape kids, have the news plastered onto British newspapers and get away with it. Just admit you are a bigot. Ok if white government officials do it, not ok if Pakis do it...LOL. Conservative logic, nothing disgusting about it.

Oh and I KNOW facts are inconvenient when you just so badly want to look down upon and insult Muslims, but here's something to trigger you(facts)


Then in August 2015 local Sheffield paper The Star published a story titled “Majority of Rotherham child exploitation suspects are white, claims new report”.[5] In fact the data was not that new but related to the time the Jay Report was being compiled. The story quotes offender profile data that was obtained from the South Yorkshire Police and which was in a draft report presented to the Council by Rotherham Safeguarding Children’s Board.
“The number of offenders, including suspects, were mainly White (68%); 24% were Asian; 5% were from other BME communities; and 3% of offenders were female”.[6]

http://moderngov.rotherham.gov.uk/documents/s100912/CSE_The_Way_Forward_2015_18%20Consultation%20Draft.pdf

Don't bother trying to hide your pain. I know you're getting triggered
Posted 12/8/16
Anyone abusing a child, physically, sexually, or mentally should be euthanized instantly, in my opinion. Race, religion or creed, no exceptions just end their existence.
1080 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 12/8/16 , edited 12/8/16

Xxanthar wrote:

Anyone abusing a child, physically, sexually, or mentally should be euthanized instantly, in my opinion. Race, religion or creed, no exceptions just end their existence.


Tory gov officials, A OK, when some Paks do it AN OUTRAGE....LIBERAL MUZZIE LOVERS AT IT AGAIN DEFENDING MUZZIE RAPISTS

But it's fine if white people do it, especially if they are rich and powerful.

Not sure if this is Brit logic and right winger logic or just right winger logic.



Anyone abusing a child, physically, sexually, or mentally should be euthanized instantly


The death penalty should be on the table, and I think we should open a discussion of what constitutes assault(because getting groped =/= raped by penetration).

Also I think we should definitely consider speedy execution(instant euthanasia as you would have it) for armed rapists(just like armed robbery is a severer crime then normal theft.) If we take forever to kill rapists, the death penalty isn't effective and then anti-DP advocates can claim "it doesn't work." It needs to be done quickly.
Nikuma 
14967 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Holland
Offline
Posted 12/8/16

octorockandroll wrote:

Don't get me wrong, that's fantastic but how is this the first European country to do this?


12115 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 12/8/16

Nikuma wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:

Don't get me wrong, that's fantastic but how is this the first European country to do this?




MidoriNoTowa explained that it's apparently just barely an issue over there so it gets swept under the radar a lot, presumably in favor of more pressing matters.
25774 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / Atlanta, GA, USA
Offline
Posted 12/8/16

PeripheralVisionary wrote:
This scares me quite a bit however. It raises moral concerns over altering someone's personality intentionally. I'm not one to use the "play god" argument against such things, but I will. Does anyone have such a right to change what nature intended, and will it be abused on even the most benign characteristics?


Well, we can clip a bird's wings to prevent it from flying away, or we can smack a dog on the nose to teach it not to bark, or we could not-so-subtly place a piece of lead in a human's brain that will forcibly unlearn all their behaviors for them, as well as permanently prevent those behaviors from being relearned. Obviously, we can already exercise considerable control over living creatures. It might be considered a violation of humanitarian rights if those techniques are used on a person, however.

It might be scary to think of future technology melting us down and replacing us with new models if we experience any errors in our thinking patterns, but that's possible with stone age technology and has certainly been practiced throughout history. So, I'm not too worried, personally. We can just keep it nice and illegal.
24288 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / Oppai Hell
Offline
Posted 12/8/16

Kavalion wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:
This scares me quite a bit however. It raises moral concerns over altering someone's personality intentionally. I'm not one to use the "play god" argument against such things, but I will. Does anyone have such a right to change what nature intended, and will it be abused on even the most benign characteristics?


Well, we can clip a bird's wings to prevent it from flying away, or we can smack a dog on the nose to teach it not to bark, or we could not-so-subtly place a piece of lead in a human's brain that will forcibly unlearn all their behaviors for them, as well as permanently prevent those behaviors from being relearned. Obviously, we can already exercise considerable control over living creatures. It might be considered a violation of humanitarian rights if those techniques are used on a person, however.

It might be scary to think of future technology melting us down and replacing us with new models if we experience any errors in our thinking patterns, but that's possible with stone age technology and has certainly been practiced throughout history. So, I'm not too worried, personally. We can just keep it nice and illegal.


My fear is that the effectiveness will doubly increase, as well as widespread implementation. Few would want to control a nation of the mentally handicapped, but a nation of the misled, the indoctrinated, and the ignorant. Games like "We Happy Few" explore this dystopian concept with current means of personal inhibition, especially medication. I think that an essential and oft times hard to reverse, even permanent changes, are reasonably frightening, though I'd argue lobotomy is marked by a lack of control, effectiveness, and certainty that even the Kim Family abstains from.
14217 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 12/8/16

Amyas_Leigh wrote:

limeparadox wrote:
i mean he started off fighting nazis, so by your standards he was probably always "anti trump leftist propaganda" =o


i didn't even say anything about trump himself though . . . the joke here is that from what i've seen of you, it makes perfect sense that you would find a character who fights nazis upsetting. like, given your very openly racist views (i.e. being offended by the mere existence of non-white superheroes even in spinoffs/aus), and unless i'm getting you mixed up with someone else you've also revealed yourself in another thread to be a holocaust denier and alluded to believing in jewish conspiracies and stuff. so i mean, you can insist you're not a literal nazi all you want, but if "not a nazi" is something you can only claim to be by technicality, you've kind of already fucked up at life pretty badly
12115 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 12/8/16

limeparadox wrote:
i didn't even say anything about trump himself though . . . the joke here is that from what i've seen of you, it makes perfect sense that you would find a character who fights nazis upsetting. like, given your very openly racist views (i.e. being offended by the mere existence of non-white superheroes even in spinoffs/aus), and unless i'm getting you mixed up with someone else you've also revealed yourself in another thread to be a holocaust denier and alluded to believing in jewish conspiracies and stuff. so i mean, you can insist you're not a literal nazi all you want, but if "not a nazi" is something you can only claim to be by technicality, you've kind of already fucked up at life pretty badly


I don't believe you are mistaken, I recall the thread in question relatively clearly.
Posted 12/8/16

limeparadox wrote:
and unless i'm getting you mixed up with someone else you've also revealed yourself in another thread to be a holocaust denier and alluded to believing in jewish conspiracies and stuff. so i mean, you can insist you're not a literal nazi all you want, but if "not a nazi" is something you can only claim to be by technicality, you've kind of already fucked up at life pretty badly


Yes I identify as Nazi-kin.Stop oppressing me. If you insult the nazis they win.




25774 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / Atlanta, GA, USA
Offline
Posted 12/8/16

PeripheralVisionary wrote:
My fear is that the effectiveness will doubly increase, as well as widespread implementation. Few would want to control a nation of the mentally handicapped, but a nation of the misled, the indoctrinated, and the ignorant. Games like "We Happy Few" explore this dystopian concept with current means of personal inhibition, especially medication. I think that an essential and oft times hard to reverse, even permanent changes, are reasonably frightening, though I'd argue lobotomy is marked by a lack of control, effectiveness, and certainty that even the Kim Family abstains from.


I was alluding to simply killing them with a bullet to the head and replacing them with new humans educated with approved materials. A lot of nations do something along those lines to start with.

But sure, there's probably tech that could handle it more quickly. I just mean to say it's difficult to control someone's actions more harshly than with death, so the issues with human rights aren't likely to get worse in the future.
One Punch Mod
116864 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Boston-ish
Offline
Posted 12/23/17
Year-end cleanup. Closing threads with no new posts since 12/31/2016.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.