First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
SJW's are both a Conservative and Liberal phenomenon.
24757 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / Oppai Hell
Online
Posted 12/10/16 , edited 12/10/16

mxdan wrote:


Potentsaliva wrote:

I'm possessed by a phenomenon known as a shit poster in modern times...I'm an immortal demon that's plagued mankind since it's birth...


Poetic. Irony.


PeripheralVisionary wrote:

A correlation with low intelligence means nothing. There are a surprisingly intelligent amount of far left and right people on the spectrum. Heck, I remember a study noting that people in the middle were usually people too lazy to research.

It is also a 20 minute video.


Well if you watched the video you would understand the characterization more but considering your unwilling to then maybe withhold an opinion on it?

Seems like a fair train of thought to me. It's pretty lazy to summarize a judgement on an issue brought up and then say you are unwilling to look at the evidence. The video finds the correlation and breaks down the pieces into separate categories. It shows that Liberals have Authoritarian SJW's who take stances on issues without compromise and Egalitarian Liberal SJW's who are so Empathetic that they are having a protectorial response to the high emotional response to the Authoritarians. This means that a lot of really smart people are still helping the ones who are incapable of breaking down issues into their nuance.

It goes on to say that this isn't strictly a Liberal case study. And SJW republicans tend to have the same exact correlation but that lack the same empathetic responses on the issues. What that means you can draw conclusions on but the same unreasonable response is being elicited in both sides. It just so happens that people of low intelligence tend to be far more likely to be unable to quell high emotional response in order to better analyze a situation.


Fair enough, perhaps it is a harsh judgement, but many of our politicians are hardcore right or left, and quite a few display exemplary display of IQ scores in that case, which essentially amounts to nothing. In any case, if you actually give a damn about discussion, summarized the video. Discussion is give and take, and unfortunately posting a video and expecting people to watch it is considered a lazy man's way of promoting it.

To add on, I tend to dismiss most works and studies with IQ scores.
Posted 12/10/16
"SJWs" tend to identify as Liberal (hence the liberal stereotype), but, generally, it's how they behave that garners the title, not how they identify on the political spectrum. Up until about six months ago, I didn't use the term seriously. "SJW," however, became a very useful umbrella term to label the phenomena that's, well, kind of a trend right now.
3006 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 12/10/16
I couldn't take it and quit listening when I heard the claim that compassion evolved from the mother-child bonding experience.
43 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
34 / M
Offline
Posted 12/10/16 , edited 12/12/16
Like some others, I've come to train myself to ignore those who claim to be anti-SJW, as too often they wind up being more obnoxious and potentially ignorant than the crowd they're trying to put down. Can thank Gamergate for that one. Similar applies to those in online gaming who automatically jump to calling people bad players or wanting hand-outs the moment some aspect of a title is called into question for discussion. As I tend to urge, just because something is not a problem for one person doesn't mean it can't be for another. Things like the wage gap are real. Racism and similar -isms do exist and do have influence on our world. Maybe not to the extreme some would want us to believe, but that doesn't mean they're not warning signs.

The rest just might be the internet eroding politeness either through anonymity or lack of consequence, and the latter is something I did wish social media and the like did take a bit more seriously.
11825 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Australia
Offline
Posted 12/10/16 , edited 12/12/16

Saidosha wrote:

Like some others, I've come to train myself to ignore those who claim to be anti-SJW, as too often they wind up being more obnoxious and potentially ignorant than the crowd they're trying to put down. Can thank Gamergate for that one. Similar applies to those in online gaming who automatically jump to calling people bad players or wanting hand-outs the moment some aspect of a title is called into question for discussion. As I tend to urge, just because something is not a problem for one person doesn't mean it can't be for another. Things like the wage gap are real. Racism and similar -isms do exist and do have influence on our world. Maybe not to the extreme some would want us to believe, but that doesn't mean they're not warning signs.

The rest just might be the internet eroding politeness either through anonymity or lack of consequence, and the latter is something I did wish social media and the like did take a bit more seriously.


My biggest issues with SJW's is that they're all anti whites. That shit aint cool and is traitorous.
It's cool to like others and to help others and be attracted to others and to be diverse and etc but to do so by acting as if you feel guilty for being or ashamed of and against your own kind/race/religion is sickening.
They always seem to want to put everyone else first, put everyone before their own. Well, it's not really against white females or gay white men, just the hetrosexual white men. So evil.
But the way taht SJW's often act actually to me makes them the racists. Not only reverse racisim but they act like white people are indeed superior, acting like we need to feel sorry for or give extra help to these poor non priviledged non whites.

And then there's the being offended by everything thing, no sense of humour, no freedom of speech, acting like bullies, trying to enforce guilt and vilify people, acting violent when someone disagrees with them or if they do not get their way, etc.
42551 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
DE4D
Offline
Posted 12/11/16
that's called 'the horseshoe theory' m'dear
739 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / F
Offline
Posted 12/11/16
There is an old saying that "he who fights monsters becomes one himself". SJWs claim to be against bigotry, but often they wind up becoming bigots themselves. Anti-SJWs claim they are against what the SJWs stand for but if you look closely at what they say, do, and act then you will realize many of them are just as bad (or sometimes worse) than the SJWs. Also, an IQ score has little to no effect as to whether or not someone is far leaning in either side of the spectrum. A person can be a technically genius, but if they are too stubborn/attached to their ideology then they will act like a fool.
28494 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M
Offline
Posted 12/11/16
SJW has become such a loaded term. Nothing wrong for wanting equality. It's the runaway political correctness they spoils a lot of crusades.
817 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / In a dumpster wit...
Offline
Posted 12/11/16
The average SJW is a person with low intellect, who takes stances just to get an instant attention pass. Like the people who call themselves liberal just to get an instant pass to being considered an innocent angel.

They also refuse to vote for anyone who isn't' all about pandering to them, and their attention needs. A constant never ending stream of changing political policies with changing special interest groups. And no one is happy.

Everyone just wants to complain and be the one that gets the most benefit. No one wants to compromise because they're not intellectually capable enough to know why you need to compromise.
mxdan 
11663 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / A Husk.
Offline
Posted 12/11/16

TheKaiserKnight wrote:

The average SJW is a person with low intellect, who takes stances just to get an instant attention pass. Like the people who call themselves liberal just to get an instant pass to being considered an innocent angel.

They also refuse to vote for anyone who isn't' all about pandering to them, and their attention needs. A constant never ending stream of changing political policies with changing special interest groups. And no one is happy.

Everyone just wants to complain and be the one that gets the most benefit. No one wants to compromise because they're not intellectually capable enough to know why you need to compromise.


Here here. If only you were in charge of one of the major news broadcasting stations my friend. :/
817 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / In a dumpster wit...
Offline
Posted 12/11/16

mxdan wrote:


TheKaiserKnight wrote:

The average SJW is a person with low intellect, who takes stances just to get an instant attention pass. Like the people who call themselves liberal just to get an instant pass to being considered an innocent angel.

They also refuse to vote for anyone who isn't' all about pandering to them, and their attention needs. A constant never ending stream of changing political policies with changing special interest groups. And no one is happy.

Everyone just wants to complain and be the one that gets the most benefit. No one wants to compromise because they're not intellectually capable enough to know why you need to compromise.


Here here. If only you were in charge of one of the major news broadcasting stations my friend. :/


Well I'd just burn their stations to the ground if that was the case. They can't be salvaged. Just uproot them, and replace them. The shit runs too deep. The next guy might fuck it up.

Bottom line, CNN is a damn caricature of a cesspool of tar and filth. You can't fix that.
3176 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M / Minnesota USA
Offline
Posted 12/11/16
i would argue that what you have stated is not the case, however, i do realize that those on the right fall victim to the same ails the so called "SJW's" have. however, the term "sjw" i feel is a term specifically for liberals who are kind of crazy, there are other more general terms for idiots such as "dummy" or "dummy poopoo face" which are non party specific. there are word specifically designed for conservatives as well however i fear getting moderated by saying it on this post so i apologize, however i hope you get the point. the word "sjw" (in my opinion) simply cannot be used to describe anyone but the left however as ive stated previously that is due to what i define it as meaning. the horshoe theory everyone keeps throwing around like they think there freaking aristotle or something is not what this is at all. the horshoe theory exists and i think its true to a large extent however in the use of the word "sjw" it means nothing. (in summary: sjw only for libs, however both sides can act in an "sjw" way but should not be called sjw unless liberal)
18652 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Los Angeles
Offline
Posted 12/11/16

Potentsaliva wrote:

I'm possessed by a phenomenon known as a shit poster in modern times...I'm an immortal demon that's plagued mankind since it's birth...


As Priests of the High Order, sent forth by the Great God Kek, in service of the God Emperor, we are commanded, to post only shit of the highest quality, TOP KEK SHITPOSTS.
mxdan 
11663 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / A Husk.
Offline
Posted 12/11/16

JohnSchwab wrote:

i would argue that what you have stated is not the case, however, i do realize that those on the right fall victim to the same ails the so called "SJW's" have. however, the term "sjw" i feel is a term specifically for liberals who are kind of crazy, there are other more general terms for idiots such as "dummy" or "dummy poopoo face" which are non party specific. there are word specifically designed for conservatives as well however i fear getting moderated by saying it on this post so i apologize, however i hope you get the point. the word "sjw" (in my opinion) simply cannot be used to describe anyone but the left however as ive stated previously that is due to what i define it as meaning. the horshoe theory everyone keeps throwing around like they think there freaking aristotle or something is not what this is at all. the horshoe theory exists and i think its true to a large extent however in the use of the word "sjw" it means nothing. (in summary: sjw only for libs, however both sides can act in an "sjw" way but should not be called sjw unless liberal)


Interesting, but I was under the impression that SJW was used to describe someone who feels like they must enact social law by using powers given to them as a citizen to protect what they view as 'justice'. Problem is that this is subjective and terms can very. Either way when someone is a SJW I don't think they are necessarily 'burdened' by one train of thought like you would suggest. That would mean that social justice only takes one form. I'm kind of confused what you mean by we need a different term to describe a conservative SJW. Because if someone is a 'social justice warrior' they are the sum of those three words. Would calling them LSJW (liberal) or CSJW (conservative) make more sense?
3176 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M / Minnesota USA
Offline
Posted 12/11/16 , edited 12/11/16

mxdan wrote:


JohnSchwab wrote:

i would argue that what you have stated is not the case, however, i do realize that those on the right fall victim to the same ails the so called "SJW's" have. however, the term "sjw" i feel is a term specifically for liberals who are kind of crazy, there are other more general terms for idiots such as "dummy" or "dummy poopoo face" which are non party specific. there are word specifically designed for conservatives as well however i fear getting moderated by saying it on this post so i apologize, however i hope you get the point. the word "sjw" (in my opinion) simply cannot be used to describe anyone but the left however as ive stated previously that is due to what i define it as meaning. the horshoe theory everyone keeps throwing around like they think there freaking aristotle or something is not what this is at all. the horshoe theory exists and i think its true to a large extent however in the use of the word "sjw" it means nothing. (in summary: sjw only for libs, however both sides can act in an "sjw" way but should not be called sjw unless liberal)


Interesting, but I was under the impression that SJW was used to describe someone who feels like they must enact social law by using powers given to them as a citizen to protect what they view as 'justice'. Problem is that this is subjective and terms can very. Either way when someone is a SJW I don't think they are necessarily 'burdened' by one train of thought like you would suggest. That would mean that social justice only takes one form. I'm kind of confused what you mean by we need a different term to describe a conservative SJW. Because if someone is a 'social justice warrior' they are the sum of those three words. Would calling them LSJW (liberal) or CSJW (conservative) make more sense?


i guess it would, and under your definition of sjw you laid out of course it could be used for both parties i simply define sjw as: "a reggressive liberal who uses logical falacies to make unaccurate and bad arguments against what it percieves to be evil and whom lives within there own bubble and refuses to give an inch to different opinions" based on that definition is why i say u can only say it too liberals however using your definition it can be used for both. i suggest, we stop using the term sjw at all since it has been squabbled down to nothingness by overuse by the internet.
First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.