First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
The debaters of CR!
15979 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Online
Posted 12/23/16
The Black Knight eventually failed his own quiz and defeated himself, though.
Posted 12/23/16

wrote:

Difficult to "debate" with the Black Knight, who always triumphs

and nevermind those limbs


OMG it's crubchyroll's ghost forum poster!
Posted 12/23/16
Looks like choppin broccoli nuked. Possibly a CIA hit. You can probably remove him from the list.
Posted 12/23/16

Xxanthar wrote:

Looks like choppin broccoli nuked. Possibly a CIA hit. You can probably remove him from the list.


cib.
Chop in Broccoli
Posted 12/23/16 , edited 12/23/16
lol Almost everyone on this thread, except for Qualeshia, who's renowned for the opposite; an absence of strong opinion, aside from a dislike of bias.

Well, there were a few notables, but they have since dropped off the radar or nuked. Otherwise, a few who stand out to me are: Prince Judar, Anime Girl (sp?), Ranwolf, PV's "tsun mode," redokami, Nanikore, and Ryulightorb.
47839 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / F / SC
Offline
Posted 12/23/16
hi

im not a debater

im a debate watcher

i like to watch the world burn

and by the world i mean crunchyroll threads

49226 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / F / New Jersey, USA
Offline
Posted 12/23/16

aeb0717 wrote:

lol Almost everyone on this thread, except for Qualeshia, who's renowned for the opposite; an absence of strong opinion, aside from a dislike of bias.



Is that a bad thing?
30098 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F
Offline
Posted 12/23/16

gornotck wrote:

"Friendly"? Where are the 'friendly' debates?


lol
Posted 12/23/16

qualeshia3 wrote:


aeb0717 wrote:

lol Almost everyone on this thread, except for Qualeshia, who's renowned for the opposite; an absence of strong opinion, aside from a dislike of bias.



Is that a bad thing?


Can be, if extreme. When person refuses to give a straight answer, it makes it all the more difficult to make decisions and hold conversations. Anyway; I was mostly teasing you, so I hope you're not taking it too seriously.
49226 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / F / New Jersey, USA
Offline
Posted 12/23/16

aeb0717 wrote:


qualeshia3 wrote:


aeb0717 wrote:

lol Almost everyone on this thread, except for Qualeshia, who's renowned for the opposite; an absence of strong opinion, aside from a dislike of bias.



Is that a bad thing?


Can be, if extreme. When person refuses to give a straight answer, it makes it all the more difficult to make decisions and hold conversations. Anyway; I was mostly teasing you, so I hope you're not taking it too seriously.


Nope. I was just curious.
13315 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / Abyss
Offline
Posted 12/23/16

Sogno- wrote:

hi

im not a debater

im a debate watcher

i like to watch the world burn

and by the world i mean crunchyroll threads



Wait, you are telling me that anime, and hence the website... ISNT THE WORLD??!

I have been living my life... wrong all this time...
33428 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
39 / Inside your compu...
Offline
Posted 12/23/16 , edited 12/23/16

PeripheralVisionary wrote:

And here I thought I would be considered a debater.


The list is almost made out to be a "most wanted" list, otherwise it'd be in alphabetical order...

You wouldn't want to be on it if it's like that.

BUT since we're on this landmine already, can't lift our feet off now can't we?

I dispute runec's assertion that nothing ever comes of the discussions.

One person was willing to reconsider his thinking on the FSM issue. Hey, good enough for me.

On that AI discussion, here's what I got out of it myself:

- A chance to consider how epiphenomenalism is neither true nor false. I've never considered it before.
- An example I was forced to come up with which was the inverse of "Brain in Vat". Ha. I can file that one away to use later...
- I was indirectly shown that using a form of Searle's Rejoinder to Systems Reply to Chinese Room argument is actually even more effective at illustrating the point than using Chinese Room itself. Neat. Noted for future...
68 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F
Offline
Posted 12/23/16 , edited 12/23/16
Lala thinks that a lot of the "debaters" here aren't true debaters. They say something has already been "debunked" without showing why, and won't listen despite the evidence proving otherwise.

[off-topic remainder of post deleted by mod]
Posted 12/23/16 , edited 12/23/16
Runec comes to mind because I like their avi, so does Xxanthar cause their avi kinda freaks me out. And Lala cause she speaks in third person and it's pretty weird. I feel like the only one who pushes their opinions so heavily, is Lala though.
Posted 12/23/16 , edited 12/23/16

LalaSataIin wrote:


Lala thinks that people who still insist that Pizzagate is debunked, despite the overwhelming evidence showing that it has not been debunked, are completely brainwashed and are serving as useful idiots to protect pedophiles. It's almost Christmas, Lala thinks that Christmas should be for the children. So why are you protecting child-traffickers?


Xxanthar thinks that Lala should go visit Comet Ping Pong and investigate for herself, if she is so concerned.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.