First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
Donald Trump at least $1.85 Billion in debt to 150 Wall Street Corporations
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

Xxanthar wrote:


KennethKenstar wrote:



Hillary Clinton isn't president-elect. You can stop bringing her up now. But, while we are at it, you are currently holding her to a higher standard than the PE


Like I said owing someone money is legal, and selling access to a government agency is not. I'll bring up whoever I feel is relevant to the discussion.


So, you said Hillary Clinton is wrong for charging donations for access to her?

What do you think of this?

https://www.publicintegrity.org/2016/12/19/20564/donald-trumps-sons-behind-nonprofit-selling-access-president-elect

Donald Trump's sons behind nonprofit selling access to president-elect
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

KennethKenstar wrote:
You really don't need to spell out how this is a conflict of interest, do you? Part of his appeal was that he would "Drain The Swamp". And yet, this article demonstrates the reality that he is owned by Wall Street.


I was criticizing the article in and of itself, KennethKenstar. It doesn't actually outline anything that hasn't been known for a while now; from various sources. The issue is that the article simply assumes that there "will be conflicts of interest if certain scenarios occur". I've voiced my concerns in other threads that illustrate that it'll be impossible for Trump to "drain the swamp" when he's actually one of the inhabitants of the same swamp he's claiming to drain.

Off-Topic:

As for what Xxanthar said about the post - it's basically a summarization of what I said. Threads are deleted because you simply post a link and quote the entire article. It's essentially leaving a basic "ahaha.. I was right because this one article said so!" feeling when you don't state an opinion on the article itself. Basically, it comes off as trolling and that's why some threads like this are removed/deleted. I reported the OP in hopes that we can simply kill off the quoted text and carry on as this hasn't been too far off-course (yet, at least).
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17


Your source is dubious at best.
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

ninjitsuko wrote:


KennethKenstar wrote:
You really don't need to spell out how this is a conflict of interest, do you? Part of his appeal was that he would "Drain The Swamp". And yet, this article demonstrates the reality that he is owned by Wall Street.


I was criticizing the article in and of itself, KennethKenstar. It doesn't actually outline anything that hasn't been known for a while now; from various sources. The issue is that the article simply assumes that there "will be conflicts of interest if certain scenarios occur". I've voiced my concerns in other threads that illustrate that it'll be impossible for Trump to "drain the swamp" when he's actually one of the inhabitants of the same swamp he's claiming to drain.

As for what Xxanthar said about the post - it's basically a summarization of what I said. Threads are deleted because you simply post a link and quote the entire article. It's essentially leaving a basic "ahaha.. I was right because this one article said so!" feeling when you don't state an opinion on the article itself. Basically, it comes off as trolling and that's why some threads like this are removed/deleted. I reported the OP in hopes that we can simply kill off the quoted text and carry on as this hasn't been too far off-course (yet, at least).


You do realize that this topic would not be off-course at all if backseat moderatoring wasn't discussed at all, right?
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

KennethKenstar wrote

You do realize that this topic would not be off-course at all if backseat moderatoring wasn't discussed at all, right?


Not entirely true, no. You've gone off the rails by taking Xxanthar's bait and utilizing faux-sources to try to illustrate your point as you normally do in these kinds of threads. You've derailed your own thread with that line of illogical reasoning.
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

KennethKenstar wrote:

You do realize that this topic would not be off-course at all if backseat moderatoring wasn't discussed at all, right?


People are pointing out rules that you are breaking so that you don't get in trouble. You choose to argue about every post directed to you in a hostile manner, naturally nobody is going to want to have a conversation with you.
9322 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / MtF / PA
Offline
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17
Literally everyone is a fraud.
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

ninjitsuko wrote:


KennethKenstar wrote

You do realize that this topic would not be off-course at all if backseat moderatoring wasn't discussed at all, right?


Not entirely true, no. You've gone off the rails by taking Xxanthar's bait and utilizing faux-sources to try to illustrate your point as you normally do in these kinds of threads. You've derailed your own thread with that line of illogical reasoning.


Faux-sources?

Aka, you've never heard of the source, I'm guessing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Public_Integrity

So, what would be an acceptable source for you? Fox News?
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

Xxanthar wrote:


KennethKenstar wrote:

You do realize that this topic would not be off-course at all if backseat moderatoring wasn't discussed at all, right?


People are pointing out rules that you are breaking so that you don't get in trouble. You choose to argue about every post directed to you in a hostile manner, naturally nobody is going to want to have a conversation with you.


Fella, this topic is for discussing Donald Fraud and not my posting. You seem to also misunderstand how forums work.

If you have an issue with my posting, take it to PMs. Otherwise, remain on topic. Thank you.

Now, you have an issue with this source?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Public_Integrity

Why?
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

KennethKenstar wrote:


Faux-sources?

Aka, you've never heard of the source, I'm guessing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Public_Integrity

So, what would be an acceptable source for you? Fox News?


I think Wiki qualifies as a Faux-source as well.
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

KennethKenstar wrote:
Faux-sources?

Aka, you've never heard of the source, I'm guessing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Public_Integrity

So, what would be an acceptable source for you? Fox News?


I've heard of the Center for Public Integrity, but you and I both know that they're not going to be considered genuine sources due to their leaning-bias towards "liberals" (Democrats) by the Republicans/conservatives on the forum. Plus, they've had their share of controversy in regards to said bias.

And no, Fox News wouldn't be considered acceptable either. However, I'm going to avoid this topic going forward. It's clear that you're simply trolling as you have in the past.
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

LalaSataIin wrote:

Try tell that to the Haitians. Lala thinks you wouldn't. They are murderers, pedophiles and rapists.

Haitian Immigrants for Trump: "Wake Up! Hillary Belongs in Jail!"


Oh my. Must flee thread before its too late!
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

ninjitsuko wrote:


KennethKenstar wrote:
Faux-sources?

Aka, you've never heard of the source, I'm guessing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Public_Integrity

So, what would be an acceptable source for you? Fox News?


I've heard of the Center for Public Integrity, but you and I both know that they're not going to be considered genuine sources due to their leaning-bias towards "liberals" (Democrats) by the Republicans/conservatives on the forum. Plus, they've had their share of controversy in regards to said bias.

And no, Fox News wouldn't be considered acceptable either. However, I'm going to avoid this topic going forward. It's clear that you're simply trolling as you have in the past.


So, if the source isn't reported by their respective bias, the news doesn't exist?

WOW
Posted 1/9/17 , edited 1/9/17

Xxanthar wrote:


LalaSataIin wrote:

Try tell that to the Haitians. Lala thinks you wouldn't. They are murderers, pedophiles and rapists.

Haitian Immigrants for Trump: "Wake Up! Hillary Belongs in Jail!"


Oh my. Must flee thread before its too late!


I love how this Youtube video is credible in your eyes after going on about how Center of Public Integrity is not credible. LMFAO
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.