First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
Post Reply Fascism Test
21953 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
The White House
Offline
Posted 1/18/17
The person who wrote this doesn't understand fascism very well.

There are many vaguely written items.

8979 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Palm Coast, Florida
Offline
Posted 1/18/17
10297 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Abyss
Offline
Posted 1/18/17
You are 51% Fascist, which makes you a
Crypto-Fascist.

Hm. I thought I would be a bit higher tbh. Still more of a socialist myself.
37637 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Florida
Offline
Posted 1/18/17
37% Fascist Fellow Traveler.
Bailek 
5094 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Right Here
Offline
Posted 1/18/17
32%, Not Fascist
yet the horrible memories of all my old math test scores have come back to kick me in the butt again
36285 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
38 / F / Seireitei, Soul S...
Offline
Posted 1/19/17

Amyas_Leigh wrote:


BlackRose0607 wrote:



Just because a place suffers from poverty doesn't mean that the culture or IQ there is less than equal to other more improved places of living.


Yes because a culture that believes they can cure AIDs infections by raping infants is equal to a culture that put a man on the moon.

Smh tbh fam

I got 54%


I wasn't talking to you so butt out.
24116 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / Oppai Hell
Online
Posted 1/19/17 , edited 1/19/17

BlackRose0607 wrote:


thebritishgeek wrote:
Not really, the easiest example would be to point to Africa and say because of their poverty they are not equal to us in culture or IQ. that statement would be correct.


Just because a place suffers from poverty doesn't mean that the culture or IQ there is less than equal to other more improved places of living. Yes, there may be better education in the more improved areas, but there have been several smart and well known people that have come from poverty stricken areas. So no, your statement is not correct. Not only that, I wouldn't trust in a test that's on a site called celebritytypes. That just sounds like they have shallow tests on there, like which celebrities personality do you have and not something actually deep that means anything.


Yes it does. Let me explain. Poverty and lower quality of education contributes greatly to IQ differences, rather than genetics, and IQ determining poverty as Charles Murray would've argued for. People who argue that these scores are reflections of achieved potential IQ are morons.

Posted 1/19/17

PeripheralVisionary wrote:



Yes it does. Let me explain. Poverty and lower quality of education contributes greatly to IQ differences, rather than genetics, and IQ determining poverty as Charles Murray would've argued for. People who argue that these scores are reflections of achieved potential IQ are morons.



Yikes... Regardless of whatever Charles Murray believes and has published, recoiling away from this line of thinking isn't without cause and merit. There is an ever-present tendency to erect superiority and inferiority complexes, which gets really, really ugly. People confusing "unequal" with being "worth more or less as a person" is a grossly unfortunate trend.
864 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M / UK
Offline
Posted 1/19/17
24%
As if that means anything from a random test. Even defining fascism isn't easy.
24116 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / Oppai Hell
Online
Posted 1/19/17

aeb0717 wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:



Yes it does. Let me explain. Poverty and lower quality of education contributes greatly to IQ differences, rather than genetics, and IQ determining poverty as Charles Murray would've argued for. People who argue that these scores are reflections of achieved potential IQ are morons.



Yikes... Regardless of whatever Charles Murray believes and has published, recoiling away from this line of thinking isn't without cause and merit. There is an ever-present tendency to erect superiority and inferiority complexes, which gets really, really ugly. People confusing "unequal" with being "worth more or less as a person" is a grossly unfortunate trend.


I was going to get into that, but what I was trying to say is poverty does contribute to IQ scores moreso than racial genetics and that Murray is full of bullshit in his claim that IQ and success are somehow related.
21953 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
The White House
Offline
Posted 1/19/17 , edited 1/19/17

PeripheralVisionary wrote:


aeb0717 wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:



Yes it does. Let me explain. Poverty and lower quality of education contributes greatly to IQ differences, rather than genetics, and IQ determining poverty as Charles Murray would've argued for. People who argue that these scores are reflections of achieved potential IQ are morons.



Yikes... Regardless of whatever Charles Murray believes and has published, recoiling away from this line of thinking isn't without cause and merit. There is an ever-present tendency to erect superiority and inferiority complexes, which gets really, really ugly. People confusing "unequal" with being "worth more or less as a person" is a grossly unfortunate trend.


I was going to get into that, but what I was trying to say is poverty does contribute to IQ scores moreso than racial genetics and that Murray is full of bullshit in his claim that IQ and success are somehow related.

IQ is also a bad measure of intelligence. Its so narrow in scope and only focuses on a few subjects. I've known rednecks who turned a shitty little house into a giant mansion with elevators, a climate controlled pool and hottub room.. The guy knew how to weld and fix pretty much any car. The guy could rig up machines really quickly too.

If he took an IQ test he would score low despite being a very skilled man because he had shitty grammar and didn't know non-practical math.
Posted 1/19/17

PeripheralVisionary wrote:



I was going to get into that, but what I was trying to say is poverty does contribute to IQ scores moreso than racial genetics and that Murray is full of bullshit in his claim that IQ and success are somehow related.


I actually wasn't entirely sure what you were getting at, so I was trying to get a feel of it.
204 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Murica
Offline
Posted 1/23/17






You Jelly?
19836 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / B.C, Canada
Offline
Posted 1/23/17


Well that was the most poorly worded bunch of questions I have ever seen. Dude was asleep the day his English teacher was teaching proper writing style I see. Anyone not hard left or hard right is going to score rather high. Hell anyone who has a vague centralist stance is going to score high. And that may I remind you boys and girls is pretty much any citizen of most successful democracies or even some republics.

That being said I see nothing inherently wrong with the philosophy behind Fascism . I however am of a much more Socialist or centralist bent and considering Fascism is an off shoot of Socialism it's no wonder anyone who is themselves a Socialist or centralist would score high. Fascism however is a little too extreme even for my taste. While I agree the state is for more important then the individual citizen I still see a need for some personal freedoms. You have to give the people of a nation something to be personally invested in. I.e you don't build a victorious army out of entirely conscripts.
204 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Murica
Offline
Posted 1/23/17

Ranwolf wrote:



Well that was the most poorly worded bunch of questions I have ever seen. Dude was asleep the day his English teacher was teaching proper writing style I see. Anyone not hard left or hard right is going to score rather high. Hell anyone who has a vague centralist stance is going to score high. And that may I remind you boys and girls is pretty much any citizen of most successful democracies or even some republics.

That being said I see nothing inherently wrong with the philosophy behind Fascism . I however am of a much more Socialist or centralist bent and considering Fascism is an off shoot of Socialism it's no wonder anyone who is themselves a Socialist or centralist would score high. Fascism however is a little too extreme even for my taste. While I agree the state is for more important then the individual citizen I still see a need for some personal freedoms. You have to give the people of a nation something to be personally invested in. I.e you don't build a victorious army out of entirely conscripts.


The only viable form of socialism that works, is when Materialistic socialism is combined with right wing social and cultural ideals.

Ethnic National Socialism.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.