Created by Tokhang
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
Post Reply Should Criminals be given a chance to live? (RAPIST, MURDERER, DRUG ADDICT, ETC)
16 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 4/4/17 , edited 4/4/17
Does criminals have right to live? Or they should just be shot dead like what is happening in the philippines right now?


Btw, the Drug Addict I mean is the ILLEGAL DRUGS, the drugs that would make you so high and you start to "RAMPAGE"

Methamphetamin Drugs the one that is rampant in the philippines. Once you take this you start being violent.


http://www.stuartxchange.com/Shabu
28258 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M
Offline
Posted 4/4/17
I'm against the death penalty so yeah jail, not death. What's going on in the Philippines sounds like Mad Max.
576 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / United Kingdom
Offline
Posted 4/4/17
I have no rights to say anything.
16 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 4/4/17 , edited 4/4/17

MysticGon wrote:

I'm against the death penalty so yeah jail, not death. What's going on in the Philippines sounds like Mad Max.


Like this I think:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/02/philippines-president-duterte-drugs-war-death-squads
http://www.cnn.com/specials/asia/philippines-drugs-war
22093 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
53 / M / In
Online
Posted 4/4/17 , edited 4/8/17

Tokhang wrote:

Does criminals have right to live? Or they should just be shot dead like what is happening in the philippines right now?




you mean where out of control vigilante groups rule the streets killing anyone they remotely think are criminals or just people they don't like then calling them criminals

Yeah we don't need self appointed death squads here
16 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 4/4/17 , edited 4/4/17

uncletim wrote:


Tokhang wrote:

Does criminals have right to live? Or they should just be shot dead like what is happening in the philippines right now?




you mean where out of control vigilante groups rule the streets killing anyone they remotely think are criminals or just people they don't like then calling them criminals

Yeah we don't need self appointed death squads here



Who's self appointed here? It is an question. A general question to other nationality who are here in crunchyroll.
22093 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
53 / M / In
Online
Posted 4/4/17

and I answered your question
Sorry you don't understand the answer
9897 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M
Offline
Posted 4/4/17
Yes they should, but only after they've fought each other to the death for it
2429 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Miami/Hawaii
Offline
Posted 4/4/17
Hmm. I think it would depend on the particular case. The crime would have to be -absolute- in terms of the rapist(s) & murderer(s) being 100% guilty for what they have committed. I believe it also should be up to the regional laws as to whether or not they should face the death penalty.

Although in my opinion, the rapist should be punishable by death not solely because of the crime's severity, but because of how it would affect a prison's atmosphere and environment.

Imo, if the murderer is of high infamy, they should perhaps also off them too. although I would think a long sentence would serve as a better punishment, since death is likely a concept that wouldn't seem to startle a murderer, not making it a punishment harsh enough.

I don't see why a drug addict shouldn't be given a chance to live...although their behavior can be significantly menacing and a threat in society, unless whilst being a drug addict they committed a crime at the same pedestal as rape/murder, they shouldn't face a death penalty.
24142 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / Oppai Hell
Online
Posted 4/4/17 , edited 5/4/17
Drug addicts?

Seriously?
24142 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / Oppai Hell
Online
Posted 4/4/17

salamisama wrote:

Hmm. I think it would depend on the particular case. The crime would have to be -absolute- in terms of the rapist(s) & murderer(s) being 100% guilty for what they have committed. I believe it also should be up to the regional laws as to whether or not they should face the death penalty.

Although in my opinion, the rapist should be punishable by death not solely because of the crime's severity, but because of how it would affect a prison's atmosphere and environment.

Imo, if the murderer is of high infamy, they should perhaps also off them too. although I would think a long sentence would serve as a better punishment, since death is likely a concept that wouldn't seem to startle a murderer, not making it a punishment harsh enough.

I don't see why a drug addict shouldn't be given a chance to live...although their behavior can be significantly menacing and a threat in society, unless whilst being a drug addict they committed a crime at the same pedestal as rape/murder, they shouldn't face a death penalty.


That is circular logic. We would not hit the gavel and declare guilty if we were not super sure. Yet, many innocent people get referred to the gallows anyway. When one is convicted, it is with a usual 100% certainty. If there is no 100% assurance, then one should not convict.

In any case, having it apply to "super sure cases" is redundant.
Posted 4/4/17 , edited 4/4/17
Murderers, rapists and pushers, sure, put em down if there is no doubt they are guilty. Addicts, no, not unless they fall under the other categories.
213 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
16 / M / the graveyard beh...
Offline
Posted 4/4/17
There's no neutral answer option so I'll add my neutral answer

It really depends on the degree of what they did, and what reason. Like if the dude killed that guy for, say, killing his daughter and it was proven that guy killed his daughter, I say fine, or if he found his wife was cheating or something where he has every reason to be mad. If it's just murder to murder, give him the chair

*controversial opinion below. Do not look if you dislike controversy or are easily triggered*
55125 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
101 / M
Offline
Posted 4/4/17 , edited 4/4/17

Tokhang wrote:

Does criminals have right to live? Or they should just be shot dead like what is happening in the philippines right now?





I made topic few year ago about how we should bring back Shinsengumi to slain Evil! But only top leader.. Ever hear the saying cut the snake head off and the rest will shatter, put fear in heart of other those who seek to take his/her place.

So instead of killing low level drug dealer, kill Drug Lord.. I'm talking about the one that doesn't care about people warfare and only concern of himself/herself.

That President of Philippine went way out of line, he killing everyone.. He should be killing the source of evil (of course can't kill Satan) like Drug Lord for example. The high level one.

2429 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Miami/Hawaii
Offline
Posted 4/4/17 , edited 4/4/17



Lol, that it is. Although I explained it that way because some people are "hair-splitters" and seem to require the obvious when it comes to explanations, and in this case that expected basis weeds out any of the possible responses that could include those that would mention the obvious.

(( Lol, the irony of me making that post. ))
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.