First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
Post Reply Where did you get your information?
5465 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M
Offline
Posted 4/30/17 , edited 4/30/17
So these days, we log on internet, we type www.google.com and if the search does not come up we are screwed. No offense to Google who got me through the good and the bad, but what if Google decided to censor particular information that is vital to us? We breath oxygen not nitrogen, so we are taught. And there is before internet (B.I). We've all seen the movie where you type in some information and all the classified information shows up, I want that.


P.S What if we create a secret base where we generate our own secrets, that is only known by the greater realm?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvpJjbphJWQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA803q6Xypk
642 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
35 / Lost.
Offline
Posted 4/30/17
Now, that's a secret.
5465 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M
Offline
Posted 4/30/17

Flying_Sea_Turtle wrote:

Now, that's a secret.


Right, I threw in some gimmicks to make it look good = =
310 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
37 / M / Weert, The Nether...
Offline
Posted 4/30/17
Just try to get access to the Dark net, u need to buy a special box just to get on that and its not a place for the faint of heart.
That should give u some things to dream about eh?
5465 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M
Offline
Posted 4/30/17 , edited 4/30/17

Weertangel wrote:

Just try to get access to the Dark net, u need to buy a special box just to get on that and its not a place for the faint of heart.
That should give u some things to dream about eh?


Well you could host your own search engine with php lol, I was tempted to create one and encrypt it with password. You can share anything you want on it.

For instance, DNA damage and telomere length, the idea that is widely known that DNA is slowly damaged by oxygen and sugar and telomere shortens each time as cell replicates but there is a possible repair method by reversing the age. The repair method is presented by SALK but it is not widely known. Information like DNA damage seems slightly outdated but it is not updated as of SALK had made a breakthrough in reversing the DNA damage and restore telomere length on Wikipedia or Google, rather DNA damage is continued to be shown in many web sites and brought up again and again. I'm not saying either is right or wrong, but this shows that the information is not being passed fast enough, or that there could be censoring going on for these types of information. As for the purpose, I have no idea. Same goes for the transcription factors and epigenetic marks, these two seem to have conflicting tasks but it is not brought up. I know it takes time for research to progress, but if information like this ever shows up on the DNA damage page for Wikipedia and Google it would make a huge difference. People would go, right DNA damage is not irreversible and telomere length could be restored. My knowledge is mainly focused on Wikipedia and Google, so if information about reverse aging ever shows up on other search engines or sites, forgive me, I could be outdated. But as of how things are going currently, it is most likely, search on Google DNA damage, telomere length, Wikipedia, DNA damage, telomere length, and I missed SALK can reverse aging by restoring DNA damage and telomere length. How do you know which site is correct? DNA damage or SALK? There should be more of a right or wrong type of thing, which gets philosophical. There should be a metric for this, just saying

P.S Well aside from confidential information I suppose the rest should be shared
anfex 
1069 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M
Offline
Posted 4/30/17
A rat, can't tell you more.

2416 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
40 / M / right here!
Online
Posted 4/30/17 , edited 4/30/17
A dog talks to me.

7313 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
π / Train / Railyard
Offline
Posted 4/30/17
Oh, I don't use Google because they're evil and they give date to the NSA.
I don't even use DNS, I just keep a list of IPs for websites such as Wikipedia or other places with lot of information in one place.
35639 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 4/30/17

fredreload wrote:
How do you know which site is correct? DNA damage or SALK? There should be more of a right or wrong type of thing, which gets philosophical. There should be a metric for this, just saying


The metric is consensus. Changes to Wikipedia are achieved through consensus and sourcing of relevant information. Changes to science via peer review. SALK's research is promising but you seem to have a misunderstanding going on in terms of the nature of scientific method as well as SALK's research. Not to mention the mechanisms of aging itself of which telomeres are only one component and one theory. Also, Wikipedia does in fact mention research into all of these fields.

The exact subject you want to be researching is actually https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senescence


8802 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M
Offline
Posted 4/30/17 , edited 4/30/17
Anime
113870 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
69 / M / Columbia, MO
Offline
Posted 4/30/17
Micro jet planes fly in 1 ear and exit out the other. Sometimes, not always, I overhear their conversations mid-flight and analyze the content. It's worked well so far.
249 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 4/30/17
This is typically the way societies work. We all work together to learn then once we have figured out those initial pursuits, after however long, some people begin to divide into sub groups within their societies dependent on those that accept or reject their findings. From there, individuals begin to perceive themselves as the only force that recognizes actual truth and often fall prey to their own nonsense in believing that others have to be shepherded by those that didn't reject the obvious.

One can see this happening across the planet in all societies atm as the findings of science already reproved all spirituality. Although whether or not someone accepts or rejects this often depends on their current choices for denial or healthiness. Since its taken long enough for this to occur that many masses have rather told themselves there is no longer a connection between spirituality and daily existence, many have rather forgotten or more accurately tricked themselves into subservience. This helps foster the notion by those prideful antichrist like characters that the masses have to be guided and cannot do well on there own. Problem with this way is that it always gets back to the same dilemma... fostering war and treating everyone like cattle as the sumerians prove with their word for war. Which all in all tends to degrade everything for us all.. except pleasure, mass production of individuals, and super conscious possibilities for anyone that figures out the truth... by doing this we are evolving all kinds hidden potential until we decide to no longer sacrifice so miserably to do so and make the hidden known.

Google is a group of individuals that is already on this track of having figured out something more than the masses of earthdwellers accept to discuss and working towards their own goals just like nearly every other group out there that elevated themselves within a system set to keep us low. We can already see google revealing their misgivings in this way as they have been actively sensoring many youtubing individuals that utilize youtube to voice themselves among the masses working to evolve their deniability.

Personally, I have seen this over and over again in books and on the internet as one can find variations constantly surfacing of forms of censorship. Governments actually do this actively in all ways they can figure out. Agencies like CIA prove their disregard for treating their masses as equals as governments now regulate their knowledge to share with their masses to help encourage blind subservience by preaching others are incapable of handling knowledge, so feed them information and distractions instead.

A society that doesn't censor would be greater than any atlantis. Censoring constantly is apart of helping the masses doubt that any such society ever existed to help rationalize the current societies being complete garbage of parasitical ideology feeding on every newborn to continue perpetuating their myths while the masses only agree upon one thing, their society is going to crumble at some point. All in all apocalyptic cults run rampart on earth and have become the foundation for governments until a fool proof way comes about to uphold the way creation always is.
5465 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M
Offline
Posted 4/30/17 , edited 4/30/17

runec wrote:


fredreload wrote:
How do you know which site is correct? DNA damage or SALK? There should be more of a right or wrong type of thing, which gets philosophical. There should be a metric for this, just saying


The metric is consensus. Changes to Wikipedia are achieved through consensus and sourcing of relevant information. Changes to science via peer review. SALK's research is promising but you seem to have a misunderstanding going on in terms of the nature of scientific method as well as SALK's research. Not to mention the mechanisms of aging itself of which telomeres are only one component and one theory. Also, Wikipedia does in fact mention research into all of these fields.

The exact subject you want to be researching is actually https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senescence




Hi, the Wikipedia page presented does not show SALK's research (it mentions epigenetics but not transcription factors which is what that matters for producing IPSC), but did show NAD+ presented by another group. I suppose I failed to look for the word Senescence, but why is it that SALK's method is not mentioned in the Wikipedia page where they reverse aging by activating the transcription factors https://www.salk.edu/news-release/turning-back-time-salk-scientists-reverse-signs-aging/? And this research is from December 15, 2016, the consensus should long be over. Is it because this research is deemed unimportant? There could be other researches like this where it went unmentioned. I am not looking for something scary, but hey, it helps in my quest to search for immortality


P.S As for telomere length and DNA damage, yes, they are all parts of the component for aging and IPSC is capable of reversing both. You cannot work on one and ignore the other. Maybe time would tell?


Flying_Sea_Turtle wrote:

Now, that's a secret.


My bad, this thread got a bit too serious, hopefully it didn't scare you off


munruo wrote:

This is typically the way societies work. We all work together to learn then once we have figured out those initial pursuits, after however long, some people begin to divide into sub groups within their societies dependent on those that accept or reject their findings. From there, individuals begin to perceive themselves as the only force that recognizes actual truth and often fall prey to their own nonsense in believing that others have to be shepherded by those that didn't reject the obvious.

One can see this happening across the planet in all societies atm as the findings of science already reproved all spirituality. Although whether or not someone accepts or rejects this often depends on their current choices for denial or healthiness. Since its taken long enough for this to occur that many masses have rather told themselves there is no longer a connection between spirituality and daily existence, many have rather forgotten or more accurately tricked themselves into subservience. This helps foster the notion by those prideful antichrist like characters that the masses have to be guided and cannot do well on there own. Problem with this way is that it always gets back to the same dilemma... fostering war and treating everyone like cattle as the sumerians prove with their word for war. Which all in all tends to degrade everything for us all.. except pleasure, mass production of individuals, and super conscious possibilities for anyone that figures out the truth... by doing this we are evolving all kinds hidden potential until we decide to no longer sacrifice so miserably to do so and make the hidden known.

Google is a group of individuals that is already on this track of having figured out something more than the masses of earthdwellers accept to discuss and working towards their own goals just like nearly every other group out there that elevated themselves within a system set to keep us low. We can already see google revealing their misgivings in this way as they have been actively sensoring many youtubing individuals that utilize youtube to voice themselves among the masses working to evolve their deniability.

Personally, I have seen this over and over again in books and on the internet as one can find variations constantly surfacing of forms of censorship. Governments actually do this actively in all ways they can figure out. Agencies like CIA prove their disregard for treating their masses as equals as governments now regulate their knowledge to share with their masses to help encourage blind subservience by preaching others are incapable of handling knowledge, so feed them information and distractions instead.

A society that doesn't censor would be greater than any atlantis. Censoring constantly is apart of helping the masses doubt that any such society ever existed to help rationalize the current societies being complete garbage of parasitical ideology feeding on every newborn to continue perpetuating their myths while the masses only agree upon one thing, their society is going to crumble at some point. All in all apocalyptic cults run rampart on earth and have become the foundation for governments until a fool proof way comes about to uphold the way creation always is.


Right, society is there and it's our duty to make it better. Thinking back the first person who created IPSC did receive a Nobel Prize for it, and he is Japanese. So for SALK to make it into Wikipedia, maybe it needs to receive a Nobel Prize as well. More research like this needs to be heard
anfex 
1069 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M
Offline
Posted 4/30/17 , edited 4/30/17

wststreet wrote:

Oh, I don't use Google because they're evil and they give date to the NSA.
I don't even use DNS, I just keep a list of IPs for websites such as Wikipedia or other places with lot of information in one place.


What are you hiding?


First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.