First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
Post Reply Where did you get your information?
21555 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Hoosierville
Offline
Posted 4/30/17 , edited 4/30/17
Google is already censoring many sites: https://streamable.com/uq0d6

I do a simple news search for something trending and its always CNN, Washintgton Post, NYTimes, Politico, and other sites that I know post nothing but fake news. Even the results google are giving me are not even related to what I type in. I'll look at page 3-5 and find exactly what I want. I've ran into it many times when it comes to politics.
35659 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 4/30/17

fredreload wrote:
Hi, the Wikipedia page presented does not show SALK's research (it mentions epigenetics but not transcription factors which is what that matters for producing IPSC), but did show NAD+ presented by another group. I suppose I failed to look for the word Senescence, but why is it that SALK's method is not mentioned in the Wikipedia page


If you think it should be mentioned then add it to the article. That's how wiki works.



fredreload wrote:
And this research is from December 15, 2016, the consensus should long be over.


Even SALK said their research is at least a decade away from even being attempted on people and that's provided they find a way of applying it to human cells. They also said their research into lengthening telomere's artificially resulted in cellular damage and instability. So that avenue was still a no go.

Science is slow, yo.



5503 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M
Offline
Posted 4/30/17 , edited 5/3/17

Rujikin wrote:

Google is already censoring many sites: https://streamable.com/uq0d6

I do a simple news search for something trending and its always CNN, Washintgton Post, NYTimes, Politico, and other sites that I know post nothing but fake news. Even the results google are giving me are not even related to what I type in. I'll look at page 3-5 and find exactly what I want. I've ran into it many times when it comes to politics.


Right, most of the time the important news is outranked by other news. For instance if I search for "reverse aging" I get how to keep your body healthy sites until I can find the SALK site that matters. If you think the term "reverse aging" is too broad, then I would need a direction on what to search for, for instance "microRNA and gene expression". It is only until recently that I've discovered microRNA exists and there is a whole class of information on it on Google, that would only show up if you type in the term "microRNA".


runec wrote:


fredreload wrote:
And this research is from December 15, 2016, the consensus should long be over.


Even SALK said their research is at least a decade away from even being attempted on people and that's provided they find a way of applying it to human cells. They also said their research into lengthening telomere's artificially resulted in cellular damage and instability. So that avenue was still a no go.

Science is slow, yo.



Right they mentioned that the human trial is 10 years away, hope all works well


P.S Hmm, I imagine something like a huge chat room, people needs to be there to know what it is though
First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.