First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
Netflix censors episode of Bill Nye the Science Guy
qwueri 
22902 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / TN
Offline
Posted 5/5/17 , edited 5/8/17
So the star of an old educational program has a section redacted to avoid misunderstandings with current scientific understanding, and that's a bad thing?
1740 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 5/5/17

Amyas_Leigh wrote:


ranran-001 wrote:

Blah blah blah. Some doctor somewhere did something stupid, and therefore it disproves tens of thousands of people who are transgender. Anecdotes are not proof of anything.


He's not just 'some doctor', he's the 'father' of all this 'gender is a construct' mess.
At this point I really don't care what an adult chooses to do to their body as long as I'm not paying for it. But when you have people like Money and Nye advocating for similar things like what he did to David to happen to other children (Nye said three year olds can decide they are the opposite gender!), that's when the pitchforks and torches should come out.


No one cares. Whoever might have been the mouthpiece to the idea is no longer important.

The invention of vaccines for small pox was done on children, it was highly unethical, and in modern times illegal. Should we abandon all vaccines because the originator was experimenting on kids against their will? I know I won't.
5255 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/5/17 , edited 5/8/17

qwueri wrote:

So the star of an old educational program has a section redacted to avoid misunderstandings with current scientific understanding, and that's a bad thing?


Because there is nothing Scientific about the recent change of Gender from meaning the same thing as Sex to being a Social Construct. There is nothing Scientific about Social Constructs.
958 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Finland
Offline
Posted 5/5/17
Ultra leftist?
Posted 5/5/17 , edited 5/8/17

ranran-001 wrote:



The invention of vaccines for small pox was done on children, it was highly unethical, and in modern times illegal.


So why is crap like what Nye is pushing legal? That children are old enough to decide they are the opposite gender and be given hormone blockers and sex reassignment because they or their parents feel like it, how is that legal?
Apparently you think what Money did was awful and unethical like most sane people should, so why support his crackpot ideas in "modern times"?
Posted 5/5/17
When i see this guy on tv i change the channel his creepy. I am sure this thread will become a back & forth
of argue see my point posting! thanks for the laughs i needed a good laugh
qwueri 
22902 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / TN
Offline
Posted 5/5/17

Granitefish wrote:

Because there is nothing Scientific about the recent change of Gender from meaning the same thing as Sex to being a Social Construct. There is nothing Scientific about Social Constructs.


So you think there is nothing scientific about social sciences?
249 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/5/17

Cavemantero wrote:

He's a hack anyways. The only thing the guy said that was ever right was that we can't go to the moon. Newtonian physics is a religion driven by Babylonian/Egyptian heliocentrism. The last true physicist was Tesla.


We are the moon and we are all the deciders of physics. All systems of thinking qualify as religions. Any system of using what's already there to create laws is babylonian. As deciders of physics, our creativity influences physics the most if we're ever going to overcome the lack of interest others have to do this. After all, any society that uses calendars is based upon babylonian ways.

There is a major shift attempting to be made by those that attempt to speak for the masses (like media) to get anyone that chooses to open up to questioning yourself as much as possible and spread confusion in various ways like redefining genders. Shifts like this tend to coincide with collapses of various systems like societies because there are actively individuals out there attempt to undo any society that they believe is in their way. America is the culmination of babylonian ideals mixed with the jewish subserviance to god and all the other problems any spiritual group has faced. In other words, America is modern Rome as the most influential country that is being brought down because of allowing all others to influence their citizens.
5255 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/5/17 , edited 5/5/17

qwueri wrote:


Granitefish wrote:

Because there is nothing Scientific about the recent change of Gender from meaning the same thing as Sex to being a Social Construct. There is nothing Scientific about Social Constructs.


So you think there is nothing scientific about social sciences?


The social sciences are more fluid and have less hard rules than the other sciences. As a result saying that one should alter former documents because of new social science understanding is irresponsible. There is very little concrete understandings in the social sciences so in a short time those documents could go right back to being correct.

In addition the Change was not Scientific but the Study of Why it Changed would be in the Social Sciences.
Posted 5/5/17

qwueri wrote:



So you think there is nothing scientific about social sciences?


Its about as scientific as astrology.

Banned
22807 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
53 / M / In
Offline
Posted 5/5/17 , edited 5/8/17

DarkBlade19 wrote:

Ultra leftist?


To be fair to the OP anything left of a Nazi is an Ultra leftist to him
qwueri 
22902 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / TN
Offline
Posted 5/5/17 , edited 5/8/17

Granitefish wrote:

The social sciences are more fluid and have less hard rules than the other sciences. As a result saying that one should alter former documents because of new social science understanding is irresponsible. There is very little concrete understandings in the social sciences so in a short time those documents could go right back to being correct.


And so an older educational program that's aired falls under the same documentation curation as a dated textbook or paper?
5255 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/5/17

qwueri wrote:


Granitefish wrote:

The social sciences are more fluid and have less hard rules than the other sciences. As a result saying that one should alter former documents because of new social science understanding is irresponsible. There is very little concrete understandings in the social sciences so in a short time those documents could go right back to being correct.


And so an older educational program that's aired falls under the same documentation curation as a dated textbook or paper?


Yes.
Banned
416 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/5/17
Bill Nye is not a scientist, he is just another leftist fraud.
qwueri 
22902 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / TN
Offline
Posted 5/5/17 , edited 5/8/17


I won't argue against the potential value in curating dated teaching material, although I do think airing it as currently accepted theory irresponsible in it's own way.


Amyas_Leigh wrote:

Its about as scientific as astrology.



So Sociologists and Psychiatrists are publishing in tabloids now?
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.