First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next  Last
the draft and hypothetical WW3
21937 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/12/17
you are free to disagree with me but IMO women should not be drafted until its the last option in a huge conflict like ww3
lets say LOTS of ppl die -obviously- and more ppl get drafted,again, and again because we need more people to fight
well in the end we need to survive right? how do we do that? with women having children , so we need lots of women in the aftermath to have children and repoputlate the country/countries

even more so when europes birthrate and our Is below the sustainable level
so I firmly believe that women in armed conflict shouldonly be a last option
23277 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
53 / M / In
Online
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/12/17
So how many kids do you have?
21937 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/12/17

uncletim wrote:

So how many kids do you have?


that's one way to avoid a topic

I suppose ill entertain you though
I don't even have a bf, and due to my own beliefs and religious beliefs im not going to have sex until im married,

im not going to just screw anyone lol


however I do plan on having at least 3-5
145 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/12/17
Hey, if women demand equality so bad, then let's give it to them. I would vote more for the option to send everyone who voted for Trump, or a supporter, out onto the front lines.
5134 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/12/17
If women want to be treated equally they must accept the bad with the good, that includes the draft and possibly dying for their country. Anything else would be sexist.
21937 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/12/17

jugrnot007 wrote:

If women want to be treated equally they must accept the bad with the good, that includes the draft and possibly dying for their country. Anything else would be sexist.


we need women to keep a country going, ya know, more people born? I wasn't saying don't let women fight AT ALL , I said only as a last resort in a HUGE conflict like ww3
please re read
also remember when in ww2 women worked in factories and other jobs when the men left? we stil have a economy and work to do you know now imagine if more women and men left , what would happen? it wouldn't be good, thos factory jobs for war supplies being made by women really helped , so there is that issue too
6638 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17
well their is some logic to that easier to repopulate if a high % of a population is killed its easier to repopulate if their are more females that survived then if more males survived when it comes to our species part of the reason why throughout history they were usually kept out of combat on top of the fact that most don't make as good soldiers then men on average even now a days the physical and even some of the mental traits men are more likely have would make a difference.
7689 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
34 / M / Pensacola
Online
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17
there won't be a draft there won't be WW3. I would be more concerned with a civil war between the left and the right.
5134 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17
The world is currently in no danger of under-population. Reverse the sexes of your statement and see if it still flies for you.
21937 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17

dragonlord1234 wrote:

well their is some logic to that easier to repopulate if a high % of a population is killed its easier to repopulate if their are more females that survived then if more males survived when it comes to our species part of the reason why throughout history they were usually kept out of combat on top of the fact that most don't make as good soldiers then men on average even now a days the physical and even some of the mental traits men are more likely have would make a difference.


THIS right here, yes we need equality, and to fight but we need to think about the long run too , the jobs MAKING army supplies in any form, and more importantly surviving as a nation
5134 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17
Sorry, I meant to quote Redokami.
21937 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17

jugrnot007 wrote:

The world is currently in no danger of under-population. Reverse the sexes of your statement and see if it still flies for you.


but individual nations are because of the birthrate ALREADY, or have you forgotten about japan?
5134 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/8/17
Japan is not under-populated. Their problem is the same as ours - pyramid scheme for social security/welfare.
21937 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17

jugrnot007 wrote:

Japan is not under-populated. Their problem is the same as ours - pyramid scheme for social security/welfare.

clearly you have forgotten how japan is literally asking their young population to have kids lol

5134 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/8/17

redokami wrote:


jugrnot007 wrote:

Japan is not under-populated. Their problem is the same as ours - pyramid scheme for social security/welfare.

clearly you have forgotten how japan is literally asking their young population to have kids lol



Clearly you didn't understand the statement you quoted. Look at a diagram of Japan's population. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Population_of_Japan_since_1872.svg
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.