First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next  Last
Post Reply the draft and hypothetical WW3
21793 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17

jugrnot007 wrote:


redokami wrote:


jugrnot007 wrote:

Japan is not under-populated. Their problem is the same as ours - pyramid scheme for social security/welfare.

clearly you have forgotten how japan is literally asking their young population to have kids lol



Clearly you didn't understand the statement you quoted. Look at a diagram of Japan's population. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Population_of_Japan_since_1872.svg


so since their population is soooo fine , why are they begging ppl to have kids? oh that's right becauseits gonna decline , and decline and decline, hardly anyone in the current generatio is having kids so if there are barely any kids from that generation will there be another generation? hmmmmmm
its NOT fien if the gov is BEGGING you to have kids and giving INCENTIVES LOL
Posted 5/7/17
how many kids you going have my friend?
21793 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17

MysteryMiss wrote:

how many kids you going have my friend?

well twins runs in my dads side so hopefully ill have twins lol
I want at least 2, but up to 5
Posted 5/7/17

redokami wrote:


MysteryMiss wrote:

how many kids you going have my friend?

well twins runs in my dads side so hopefully ill have twins lol
I want at least 2, but up to 5


>> wow your going need some money to raise them they eat a lot grow out of clothes quick!
etc.. it takes money I raised one my baby days done Lol.
21793 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17

MysteryMiss wrote:


redokami wrote:


MysteryMiss wrote:

how many kids you going have my friend?

well twins runs in my dads side so hopefully ill have twins lol
I want at least 2, but up to 5


>> wow your going need some money to raise them they eat a lot grow out of clothes quick!
etc.. it takes money I raised one my baby days done Lol.


I know it takes money :C but unlike what some people think, poor people are allowedto have children and the parents and kids can still be happy
1766 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Spokane, Washingt...
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17
The worst part about USA draft is that if your a dude and turning 18, you need to sign up for it, or (apparently, can't confirm) you lose out on so much, such as college aid, or something... I really don't know actually, and if I wasn't forced into it by my evil stepmother, I probably would not have sold my soul to the US military.

Besides, it doesn't even mean much to me. If we get into a war so bad that they need a draft, I'd have already signed up beforehand (if it's a Korean war) or will defend myself and my home to the bloody last and die for my country on my own terms; inside my own house. (for any other war that isn't a Korean war)

Don't argue over a female draft or whatever, argue over the concept of a draft in the first place! This is America, land of the free. Start acting like it and saying no to being forced to be cannon fodder unwillingly!
21793 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17

Lance_Clemings wrote:

The worst part about USA draft is that if your a dude and turning 18, you need to sign up for it, or (apparently, can't confirm) you lose out on so much, such as college aid, or something... I really don't know actually, and if I wasn't forced into it by my evil stepmother, I probably would not have sold my soul to the US military.

Besides, it doesn't even mean much to me. If we get into a war so bad that they need a draft, I'd have already signed up beforehand (if it's a Korean war) or will defend myself and my home to the bloody last and die for my country on my own terms; inside my own house. (for any other war that isn't a Korean war)

Don't argue over a female draft or whatever, argue over the concept of a draft in the first place! This is America, land of the free. Start acting like it and saying no to being forced to be cannon fodder unwillingly!


this right heretbh too
but I was mainly talking about our nations needing to survive
Banned
21752 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
53 / M / In
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17

redokami wrote:


uncletim wrote:

So how many kids do you have?


that's one way to avoid a topic

I suppose ill entertain you though
I don't even have a bf, and due to my own beliefs and religious beliefs im not going to have sex until im married,

im not going to just screw anyone lol


however I do plan on having at least 3-5


So your morals prevent you from being breeding stock for the state but your fine if it's others?
21793 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17

uncletim wrote:


redokami wrote:


uncletim wrote:

So how many kids do you have?


that's one way to avoid a topic

I suppose ill entertain you though
I don't even have a bf, and due to my own beliefs and religious beliefs im not going to have sex until im married,

im not going to just screw anyone lol


however I do plan on having at least 3-5


So your morals prevent you from being breeding stock for the state but your fine if it's others?


you are being a little bit extreme here
im not talking about hitler style breeding camps , damn but natural process, whether you want to go be a prostitute , do it with a friend or while married idc, , as long as there are more females around, and we have children to keep the nation going

don't be so extreme
edit: you specifically and ONLY asked how many kids do I have, so I told you, as an individual those are my values , not everyone is the same
like I said, as long as there are more females around to SIMPLY have kids
a female cant have kids if shes dead amirite
19379 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 5/7/17
The "Draft" is implemented when creating large concentrated manpower armies not smaller diverse professional armies. WW3 is likely to be fought in a short nuclear campaign against massive targets, thus a Draft is unlikely and make targets of training/assembly areas. You are more likely to experience a Draft in WW4 when we are all back to lower technology weapons.
Dragon
65093 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 5/7/17

redokami wrote:

you are free to disagree with me but IMO women should not be drafted until its the last option in a huge conflict like ww3
lets say LOTS of ppl die -obviously- and more ppl get drafted,again, and again because we need more people to fight
well in the end we need to survive right? how do we do that? with women having children , so we need lots of women in the aftermath to have children and repoputlate the country/countries

even more so when europes birthrate and our Is below the sustainable level
so I firmly believe that women in armed conflict shouldonly be a last option


Question - what about women that can't have children due to medical issues, or having their tubes tied, or because they have an IUD that is supposed to last longer than the projected duration of the war?

Related, should those unable to have children, male or female, be drafted on a priority basis over those who are theoretically able to produce children?
59386 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
59 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 5/7/17

redokami wrote:

you are free to disagree with me but IMO women should not be drafted until its the last option in a huge conflict like ww3
lets say LOTS of ppl die -obviously- and more ppl get drafted,again, and again because we need more people to fight
well in the end we need to survive right? how do we do that? with women having children , so we need lots of women in the aftermath to have children and repoputlate the country/countries

even more so when europes birthrate and our Is below the sustainable level
so I firmly believe that women in armed conflict shouldonly be a last option


If women wish to be treated equally then they must accept the same risks men do - to wit, registering for Selective Service.

Setting aside for the moment the probability that the U.S. will never again enforce conscription, it is doubtful that the law would be changed to require females to register for Selective Service - every attempt has thus far been discouraged in Congress. It has been difficult enough to get women into combat roles from voluntary service, let alone imagining a scenario wherein the nation would need to conscript them into such roles.

If you really want to limit the use of conscription, do away with the myriad exemptions. Daddy Sawbucks is less likely to support armed conflict if Junior and Little Miss are likely to be drawn in.
21793 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17

MakotoKamui wrote:


redokami wrote:

you are free to disagree with me but IMO women should not be drafted until its the last option in a huge conflict like ww3
lets say LOTS of ppl die -obviously- and more ppl get drafted,again, and again because we need more people to fight
well in the end we need to survive right? how do we do that? with women having children , so we need lots of women in the aftermath to have children and repoputlate the country/countries

even more so when europes birthrate and our Is below the sustainable level
so I firmly believe that women in armed conflict shouldonly be a last option


Question - what about women that can't have children due to medical issues, or having their tubes tied, or because they have an IUD that is supposed to last longer than the projected duration of the war?

Related, should those unable to have children, male or female, be drafted on a priority basis over those who are theoretically able to produce children?


imo there shouldn't be a draft at all, it should be voluntary

Iif the women who are unable to have kids want to fight then let them, but as I said for the sake of the nation getting back on its feet after conflict we should hold back some women, we are already at a 1.8 birthrate per couple and some Europe countries are even lower, that's below sustainable level if you take out immigration <but that's a dif issue
im not talking about like Iraq war or whatever but a HUGE war where millions die we NEED people to stay back to populate, no im not talking aboutcamps or some shit "breeding stock" like that user thought I was, but simply about the people being alive to produce, and since women carry the children in them then that does kinda make them priority in that sense
as I said imo it should be voluntary on whether or not u fight, men and women, but alas we have a draft

2378 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Bay Area
Offline
Posted 5/7/17
Our nations dont need to survive. We are not at risk of underpopulation, or at risk of dying out anytime soon. Even if 5 of the 7 continents went extinct with humans, we'd still be dangerously overpopulated as a species. If anything, we need about 7 billion people to die right now if any of us want any hope of survival. With almost 9 billion people on this planet, are you seriously worried that a world war would effectively take up every single women, and kill them, so no one can repopulate? No, there's at least 4 billion women alive at this point in time. We are fine, what we really need as a planet is about 40 years of no one having any babies, and then that next generation would also wait about another 30-40 years to have any kids in order for the human population to be steady, safe and effective. What you SHOULD be worried about is OVER-population, because no, the human race won't go extinct if women are drafted into a WW3
21793 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F
Offline
Posted 5/7/17 , edited 5/7/17

konjfful wrote:

Our nations dont need to survive. We are not at risk of underpopulation, or at risk of dying out anytime soon. Even if 5 of the 7 continents went extinct with humans, we'd still be dangerously overpopulated as a species. If anything, we need about 7 billion people to die right now if any of us want any hope of survival. With almost 9 billion people on this planet, are you seriously worried that a world war would effectively take up every single women, and kill them, so no one can repopulate? No, there's at least 4 billion women alive at this point in time. We are fine, what we really need as a planet is about 40 years of no one having any babies, and then that next generation would also wait about another 30-40 years to have any kids in order for the human population to be steady, safe and effective. What you SHOULD be worried about is OVER-population, because no, the human race won't go extinct if women are drafted into a WW3


so you only want 2 billion people on the planet?
also im not talking about women going extinct as a whole, im talking about the survival of individual nations, the French peoples the british peoples the Japanese peoples the American peoples

but clearly if you want 7 billion gone that would wipe out entire countries
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.