First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
Post Reply Professors Pull Off Clever Hoax With ‘Penis Paper’, Expose Liberal Academia as a Sham
10456 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
34 / M / People's Republic...
Offline
Posted 5/24/17
Blaming penises for global warming is supposed to be parody, but it's something you could expect from gender studies departments at universities. It's supposed to be a joke, but it's the reality. The reality is a joke.
21417 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Hoosierville
Offline
Posted 5/24/17 , edited 5/25/17

rawratl wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:


rawratl wrote:


mxdan wrote:

The peer reviewed process is one of the best means out of all the methods of truth we have. Just because you guys distrust colleges for 'liberalism' in its continued support of the sciences does not make the process flawed. What you have is a specific outlier in a field that is spotty to begin with, not common trend.

Something peer reviewed journals are alarmingly cognizant of most of the time.

I mean what is it that your arguing? That that the peer review process is all a hoax? That thousands of scientists across the globe are that petty that they spend all their time and effort not researching a thing? Have you ever even been a part of a peer review process? What makes you an expert on this matter? Why should people believe your narrative over the more believable one?

This petty anti-science agenda you guys are developing is really quite insane. Especially while you sit and utilize things that the process helped create in the first place but is taken for granted.


He just doesn't like colleges, once had a conversation with him on how every male in college is a cuck because the women in college have the freedom to sleep with whom they want.


That can't actually have been something that was said.


I hope.


Actually makes it seem more tame the way I phrased it. Actual comment was something along the lines of "liberal college sluts sleep with everyone and cheat, so all the liberal guys chasing them are literal cucks."


Huh...? Are you drunk?
48260 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M
Offline
Posted 5/24/17

Rujikin wrote:


rawratl wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:


rawratl wrote:


mxdan wrote:

The peer reviewed process is one of the best means out of all the methods of truth we have. Just because you guys distrust colleges for 'liberalism' in its continued support of the sciences does not make the process flawed. What you have is a specific outlier in a field that is spotty to begin with, not common trend.

Something peer reviewed journals are alarmingly cognizant of most of the time.

I mean what is it that your arguing? That that the peer review process is all a hoax? That thousands of scientists across the globe are that petty that they spend all their time and effort not researching a thing? Have you ever even been a part of a peer review process? What makes you an expert on this matter? Why should people believe your narrative over the more believable one?

This petty anti-science agenda you guys are developing is really quite insane. Especially while you sit and utilize things that the process helped create in the first place but is taken for granted.


He just doesn't like colleges, once had a conversation with him on how every male in college is a cuck because the women in college have the freedom to sleep with whom they want.


That can't actually have been something that was said.


I hope.


Actually makes it seem more tame the way I phrased it. Actual comment was something along the lines of "liberal college sluts sleep with everyone and cheat, so all the liberal guys chasing them are literal cucks."


Huh...? Are you drunk?


http://www.crunchyroll.com/forumtopic-967273/results-of-the-1st-2016-debate?pg=3#54809963

Happened again in another thread but that's the first one that pops up when searching "cuck"
21417 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Hoosierville
Offline
Posted 5/24/17 , edited 5/24/17

rawratl wrote:


http://www.crunchyroll.com/forumtopic-967273/results-of-the-1st-2016-debate?pg=3#54809963

Happened again in another thread but that's the first one that pops up when searching "cuck"


Aaaand you just proved yourself wrong, thanks.
382 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M
Offline
Posted 5/24/17
People who are convinced gender studies are a sham won't be convinced, whatever I say, but this most recent attempt to repeat the Sokal hoax doesn't exactly convince.


The first journal that Bognossian and Lindsay submitted their hoax paper to, and that rejected it, was NORMA: The International Journal for Masculinity Studies. This journal doesn’t even hit the top 115 journals in Gender Studies. So, what happened here was that they submitted a hoax paper to an unranked journal, which summarily rejected it. They then received an auto-generated response directing them to a pay-to-publish vanity journal. They submitted the paper there, and it was published. From this chain of events they conclude that the entire field of Gender Studies is “crippled academically”. This tells us very little about Gender Studies, but an awful lot about the perpetrators of this “hoax”…. and those who tout it as a take down of an entire field.

http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2017/05/conceptual-penis-hoax-just-big-cock/
28450 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Bundaberg, Queens...
Online
Posted 5/25/17
in the end peer reviewed academia is still alot more trustable then non-peer reviewed academia.

Nothing is flawless.

Nothing to see here people.
19562 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
47 / M / Auburn, Washington
Offline
Posted 5/25/17

rawratl wrote:

Actually makes it seem more tame the way I phrased it. Actual comment was something along the lines of "liberal college sluts sleep with everyone and cheat, so all the liberal guys chasing them are literal cucks."


The fair interpretation of that comment is that it's stupid to chase liberal college chicks because they will cheat on you. That's not a particularly awful thing to say.

Of course, the people in this thread aren't exactly known for their reading comprehension. Or their fairness.
First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.