First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
Post Reply If a parent tells their kid theres more than 2 Genders, should the kid be taking away from them?
8801 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Definitely not EU
Offline
Posted 5/27/17

octorockandroll wrote:


DanteVSTheWorld wrote:

Maybe they're attraction or whatever is on a 'fluid spectrum', but there are only 2 genders.



But this study isn't about attraction, it's about gender.


Yeah...between male and female.
Posted 5/27/17

uncletim wrote:


Kefkapwnsall wrote:


uncletim wrote:

I gender identify as a Attack Helicopter


can you please stop


oh come on that was classic


Not really I've heard that so often its become a cliche and honestly a little boring
12117 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/29/17

DanteVSTheWorld wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:


DanteVSTheWorld wrote:

Maybe they're attraction or whatever is on a 'fluid spectrum', but there are only 2 genders.



But this study isn't about attraction, it's about gender.


Yeah...between male and female.


Again, the study clearly shows neurological proof of gender being a fluid spectrum. I don't get why you're so adamant about ignoring that.
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/29/17

octorockandroll wrote:


But this study isn't about attraction, it's about gender.


Its also bunk. Pseudoscience created by a pedophile quack named John Money.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=os7bOBlre5E
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/29/17
Or here's an idea you let people live their lives and respect their genders
8801 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Definitely not EU
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17

octorockandroll wrote:

Again, the study clearly shows neurological proof of gender being a fluid spectrum. I don't get why you're so adamant about ignoring that.


Because it's bullshit, read below.


Amyas_Leigh wrote:

Its also bunk. Pseudoscience created by a pedophile quack named John Money.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=os7bOBlre5E



12117 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 5/27/17

Amyas_Leigh wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:


But this study isn't about attraction, it's about gender.


Its also bunk. Pseudoscience created by a pedophile quack named John Money.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=os7bOBlre5E



If it's bunk then disprove it. All you've done is post a video about someone who had no involvement with this study whatsoever.
12117 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/29/17

DanteVSTheWorld wrote:

Because it's bullshit, read below.



So a study is bullshit because someone who had nothing to do with the study was a pedophile?

I realize people like you and Boxer do a lot of mental gymnastics to justify your prejudice but even with that in mind that's a pretty shitty attempt at a refutation.
9529 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / The Void
Offline
Posted 5/27/17
You must be right on the money to trigger "them" this hard.
11833 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
17 / M
Offline
Posted 5/27/17
...........
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/29/17
Nah
Although this actually super pisses me off BECAUSE I know someone who lost custody and I think her being trans might have had an impact. Doesn't help that it actually happens.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/nov/22/parents-fear-transgender-children-will-be-taken-away-after-court-ruling
Cisek v. Cisek (1982)
http://blog.timesunion.com/transgender/court-takes-couples-children-because-father-is-transgender/1690/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11551217/Transgender-father-loses-court-battle-over-childrens-birth-certificates.html
8801 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Definitely not EU
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/29/17

octorockandroll wrote:

So a study is bullshit because someone who had nothing to do with the study was a pedophile?

I realize people like you and Boxer do a lot of mental gymnastics to justify your prejudice but even with that in mind that's a pretty shitty attempt at a refutation.


How can I debate with people with their make-believe beliefs. If a war was to break out tomorrow all this

- 'Oh I'm a Androgynes'
- 'Oh really? cool I'm Genderqueer'
- 'Oh yeah!? Well I'm Gender Variant'

All this shit would be dropped. It's nothing but a bunch of made up words.
Posted 5/27/17

octorockandroll wrote:


If it's bunk then disprove it. All you've done is post a video about someone who had no involvement with this study whatsoever.


The video wasn't about John Money, it was about the pseudoscience behind this mess.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18069992
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.