First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
If a parent tells their kid theres more than 2 Genders, should the kid be taking away from them?
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17
Look a trans woman didn't even get visitation despite a clean record and I'm supposed to pretend there isn't a problem
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/30/17

DanteVSTheWorld wrote:


Kefkapwnsall wrote:

Opinions can be wrong asshole
Shaq has the opinion the world is flat
Saying it's your opinion is not a blanket forgiveness
Also I am gay


Who cares if he thinks the world is flat, it's not. And congrats on being gay, idc. I don't support gay parents having kids. A kid needs a mother and father, without one or the other, as I said, can cause serious problems. Maybe you should read up on this instead of expecting everything to shape to what you want.

Then just say you are homophobic
I mean you are just say you fear gay parents just be overt

Don't say you aren't
12137 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/30/17

DanteVSTheWorld wrote:

Once again, only 2 genders exist. Male or Female, there's nothing to prove. Besides this thread is about parents who force upon their kids this area of discussion, not a discussion if there are more genders, which there isn't.

Typical liberal, someone has an opinion, gets offended. A kid needs to be raised by a mother and father figure, missing one or the other can cause serious problems for the kid.


Once again you try to pass off even more bullshit. You've been shown factual evidence proving the opposite of your claims. If you're going to deny it and go so far as to attack people, then the least you can do is back your statements up. Speaking of which, no. That was not what you said this thread is about. Your initial statements were to attack people who acknowledged the reality of a situation you willfully ignore and advocate they lose the right to be parents because of thought crimes. This was never about parents "forcing" anything.

Also, if you can't tell the difference between someone being offended because someone else had an opinion and someone being upset because you told them they shouldn't be allowed to be a parent you're probably not in a position to act like you know better than leading scientists.
12137 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17

Rujikin wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:
So a study is bullshit because someone who had nothing to do with the study was a pedophile?

I realize people like you and Boxer do a lot of mental gymnastics to justify your prejudice but even with that in mind that's a pretty shitty attempt at a refutation.


If gender is a fluid spectrum wouldn't identifying as a young boy/girl also be on that spectrum?


Seeing as age is not on that spectrum, no.
8801 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Definitely not EU
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17

Kefkapwnsall wrote:


DanteVSTheWorld wrote:


Kefkapwnsall wrote:

Opinions can be wrong asshole
Shaq has the opinion the world is flat
Saying it's your opinion is not a blanket forgiveness
Also I am gay


Who cares if he thinks the world is flat, it's not. And congrats on being gay, idc. I don't support gay parents having kids. A kid needs a mother and father, without one or the other, as I said, can cause serious problems. Maybe you should read up on this instead of expecting everything to shape to what you want.

Then just say you are homophobic
I mean you are just say you fear gay parents just be overt



What is this, the equivalent to pulling the race card? lol.



How are you even writing so much stuff. People are born, they are either male or female, and rarely somewhere down the line maybe trans, that's all there is too it.
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/30/17
Not exactly its more like people respect you more if you are laconic in your speech and don't hide your biases behind coded language
12137 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/30/17

DanteVSTheWorld wrote:

What is this, the equivalent to pulling the race card? lol.



If you don't want to be called homophobic don't act homophobic. Life is pretty simple that way.
23182 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
The White House
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17

octorockandroll wrote:


Rujikin wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:
So a study is bullshit because someone who had nothing to do with the study was a pedophile?

I realize people like you and Boxer do a lot of mental gymnastics to justify your prejudice but even with that in mind that's a pretty shitty attempt at a refutation.


If gender is a fluid spectrum wouldn't identifying as a young boy/girl also be on that spectrum?


Seeing as age is not on that spectrum, no.


So what specifically is on that spectrum? What are the limits/constraints?
12137 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17

Rujikin wrote:

So what specifically is on that spectrum? What are the limits/constraints?


Why don't you read the study?
26393 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Roasting In Hell
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17
If a parent wants to tell their child about how to be a Neo-Nazi, or a Westboro Baptist Follower, or anything of that nature, then I would say that is not an area where the law should intervene.

It is within a certain right for parents to teach their children the values and things they want to believe, and while I am not sure if there should be a limit to what one can be taught in terms of ideas and possibly facts and or assertions, neither the topic or what I mentioned would fall under this in my opinion. We do not need the government to be moral busy bodies.

I am not sure I should address the basics of the gender spectrum, but I am addressing the larger question. Do we take away children from parents for just preaching hateful ideas about race, gender, or anything resembling an inane or controversial idea, or the factual assertion that Gods exist without evidence, or that they will burn in hell if they do so and so? We don't obviously, but should we?

I cannot imagine the people or our leaders to establish such limits at all, nor do I believe it should be in their power now or 500 years after. So no, no I do not. You cannot force acceptance, and the mind is natural resistant, and in terms of legal philosophy, this is highly unviable and incredibly dangerous to freedom.

Let parents teach what they want to for the most part, and the children can assume responsibility at 18 and leave the house to come up with their own ideas eventually.
12137 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17

DanteVSTheWorld wrote:

How are you even writing so much stuff. People are born, they are either male or female, and rarely somewhere down the line maybe trans, that's all there is too it.


Uh, nope. Already shown you otherwise, bucko. Sorry but science is more reliable than your pre conceived notions.
23182 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
The White House
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17

octorockandroll wrote:

Why don't you read the study?


Why can't you tell me the constraints since you read the study?
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17
Point is actual trans people get less visitation than cis psople
So statements like this hurt
8801 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Definitely not EU
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17

Kefkapwnsall wrote:

Not exactly its more like people respect you more if you are laconic in your speech and don't hide your biases behind coded language


There is a reason it takes a male and female to create offspring. Because that's how it works. You're here today because of it.
12137 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Winnipeg, MB.
Offline
Posted 5/27/17 , edited 5/28/17

Rujikin wrote:


octorockandroll wrote:

Why don't you read the study?


Why can't you tell me the constraints since you read the study?


Sure! I love repeating myself multiple times over!
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.